PosgenPy: An Automated and Reproducible Approach to Assessing the Validity of Cluster Search Parameters in Atom Probe Tomography Datasets
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract One of the main capabilities of atom probe tomography (APT) is the ability to not only identify but also characterize early stages of precipitation at length scales that are not achievable by other techniques. One of the most popular methods to identify nanoscale clustering in APT data, based on the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), is used extensively in many branches of research. However, it is common that not all of the steps leading to the selection of certain parameters used in the analysis are reported. Without knowing the rationale behind parameter selection, it may be difficult to compare cluster parameters obtained by different researchers. In this work, a simple open-source tool, PosgenPy, is used to justify cluster search parameter selection via providing a systematic sweep through parameter values with multiple randomizations to minimize a false-positive cluster ratio. The tool is applied to several different microstructures: a simulated material system and two experimental datasets from a low-alloy steel . The analyses show how values for the various parameters can be selected to ensure that the calculated cluster number density and cluster composition are accurate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Oxford Department of Materials, , Oxford OX1 3PH, UK
Culham Science Centre UK Atomic Energy Authority, , Abingdon OX14 3DB, UK
Culham Science Centre National Nuclear Laboratory, , Abingdon OX14 3DB, UK
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Rolls-Royce
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Analysis of conventional and three-dimensional atom probe data for multiphase materials10.1063/1.356258 ↗
2. Correlation and contingency analysis of atom probe data: Diffusion-controlled dissolution of precipitates10.1515/ijmr-1994-850517 ↗
3. Metrology of small particles and solute clusters by atom probe tomography10.1016/j.actamat.2020.02.023 ↗
4. Atom probe tomography interlaboratory study on clustering analysis in experimental data using the maximum separation distance approach10.1017/S1431927618015581 ↗
5. Ester · 1996
6. Hierarchical density-based cluster analysis framework for atom probe tomography data10.1016/j.ultramic.2019.01.011 ↗
7. Haley · 2012
8. Analysis of three-dimensional atom-probe data by the proximity histogram10.1007/S100050010051 ↗
9. Analysis of radiation damage in light water reactors: Comparison of cluster analysis methods for the analysis of atom probe data10.1017/S1431927616012678 ↗
10. An analysis of the structure of irradiation induced Cu-enriched clusters in low and high nickel welds10.1557/PROC-650-R6.6 ↗
11. A sensitivity analysis of the maximum separation method for the characterisation of solute clusters10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.12.015 ↗
12. The Maximum separation cluster analysis algorithm for atom-probe tomography: Parameter determination and accuracy10.1017/S1431927614013294 ↗
13. Using alpha hulls to automatically and reproducibly detect edge clusters in atom probe tomography datasets10.1016/j.matchar.2019.110078 ↗
14. New computational method in the theory of spinodal decomposition10.1103/PhysRevA.11.1417 ↗
15. London · 2019
16. Marquis · 2019
17. Applications of atom-probe tomography to the characterisation of solute behaviours10.1016/j.mser.2010.05.001 ↗
18. An atom probe field ion microscopy study of neutron-irradiated pressure vessel steels10.1016/0022-3115(92)90364-Q ↗
19. Local magnification effects in the atom probe10.1016/0039-6028(91)90449-3 ↗
20. Embrittlement of RPV steels: An atom probe tomography perspective10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.003 ↗
21. Contingency table techniques for three dimensional atom probe tomography10.1002/jemt.20412 ↗
22. On the history and status of reactor pressure vessel steel ductile to brittle transition temperature shift prediction models10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151863 ↗
23. Direct observation of copper precipitation in a neutron irradiated FeCu alloy by 3D atomic tomography10.1016/0956-716X(95)00329-T ↗
24. Atom probe tomography: Development and application to the geosciences10.1111/ggr.12313 ↗
25. DBSCAN revisited, revisited: Why and how you should (still) use DBSCAN10.1145/3068335 ↗
26. New techniques for the analysis of fine-scaled clustering phenomena within atom probe tomography (APT) data10.1017/S1431927607070900 ↗
27. Atom probe tomography of interfaces in ceramic films and oxide scales10.1557/mrs.2015.307 ↗
28. Quantitative methods for the APT analysis of thermally aged RPV steels10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.12.003 ↗
29. A procedure for quantification of precipitate microstructures from three-dimensional atom probe data10.1016/S0304-3991(02)00319-4 ↗
30. The application of the OPTICS algorithm to cluster analysis in atom probe tomography data10.1017/S1431927618015386 ↗
31. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship10.1038/sdata.2016.18 ↗
32. Defining clusters in APT reconstructions of ODS steels10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.12.011 ↗
33. Detecting clusters in atom probe data with Gaussian mixture models10.1017/S1431927617000320 ↗