Quantification of Trace-Level Silicon Doping in AlxGa1–xN Films Using Wavelength-Dispersive X-Ray Microanalysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Wavelength-dispersive X-ray (WDX) spectroscopy was used to measure silicon atom concentrations in the range 35–100 ppm [corresponding to (3–9) × 1018 cm−3] in doped AlxGa1–xN films using an electron probe microanalyser also equipped with a cathodoluminescence (CL) spectrometer. Doping with Si is the usual way to produce the n-type conducting layers that are critical in GaN- and AlxGa1–xN-based devices such as LEDs and laser diodes. Previously, we have shown excellent agreement for Mg dopant concentrations in p-GaN measured by WDX with values from the more widely used technique of secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). However, a discrepancy between these methods has been reported when quantifying the n-type dopant, silicon. We identify the cause of discrepancy as inherent sample contamination and propose a way to correct this using a calibration relation. This new approach, using a method combining data derived from SIMS measurements on both GaN and AlxGa1–xN samples, provides the means to measure the Si content in these samples with account taken of variations in the ZAF corrections. This method presents a cost-effective and time-saving way to measure the Si doping and can also benefit from simultaneously measuring other signals, such as CL and electron channeling contrast imaging.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Ga2O3 and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1017/S143192761801541610.1017/S1431927618015416 ↗
2. 10.2138/am-1999-1-20710.2138/am-1999-1-207 ↗
3. Fournelle, J (2006). Silicate peak shifts, spectrometer peaking issues and standard/specimen size discrepancies in EPMA: 3 Bumps in the road to the goal of 1% accuracy. In AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts.
4. 10.1088/0268-1242/21/9/01310.1088/0268-1242/21/9/013 ↗
5. 10.1088/1361-6463/abbc9510.1088/1361-6463/abbc95 ↗
6. 10.1002/pssc.20056541110.1002/pssc.200565411 ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2015.00390.x10.1111/j.1751-908X.2015.00390.x ↗
8. 10.1063/1.489049710.1063/1.4890497 ↗
9. 10.1116/1.501300110.1116/1.5013001 ↗
10. 10.1017/S143192761201347510.1017/S1431927612013475 ↗
11. 10.1002/aelm.20160050110.1002/aelm.201600501 ↗
12. Techniques for improving quantitative analysis of mineral glasses
13. 10.2138/am-2016-562810.2138/am-2016-5628 ↗
14. 10.1002/pssa.20030408910.1002/pssa.200304089 ↗
15. Jercinovic, M , Williams, M , Allaz, J & Donovan, J (2012). Trace analysis in EPMA. IOP Conf Ser: Mat Sci Eng 32.10.1088/1757-899X/32/1/012012 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11664-019-07098-610.1007/s11664-019-07098-6 ↗
17. An improved interference correction for trace element analysis
18. Fournelle, J (2007). Problems in trace element EPMA: Modeling secondary fluorescence with PENEPMA. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, pp. V51A-0329.
19. 10.1017/S143192761600297X10.1017/S143192761600297X ↗
20. Sato, A , Mori, N , Takakura, M & Notoya, S (2007). Examination of analytical conditions for trace elements based on the detection limit of EPMA (WDS). JEOL News 42E (No.1).
21. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.11297710.1016/j.ultramic.2020.112977 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.08.02410.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.08.024 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mee.2017.11.02110.1016/j.mee.2017.11.021 ↗
24. Robin, E , Mollard, N , Guilloy, K , Pauc, N , Gentile, P , Fang, Z , Daudin, B , Amichi, L , Jouneau, P , Bougerol, C , Delalande, M & Bavencove, A (2016). Quantification of dopants in nanomaterial by SEM/EDS. European Microscopy Congress 2016: Proceedings.10.1002/9783527808465.EMC2016.6335 ↗
25. 10.2138/am.2011.363110.2138/am.2011.3631 ↗
26. 10.1063/5.003146810.1063/5.0031468 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mssp.2016.11.00610.1016/j.mssp.2016.11.006 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.500836310.1063/1.5008363 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2016.07.01310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2016.07.013 ↗
30. 10.2138/am.2005.142210.2138/am.2005.1422 ↗
31. 10.1029/JZ072i018p0468910.1029/JZ072i018p04689 ↗
32. 10.2110/jsr.2005.02310.2110/jsr.2005.023 ↗
33. 10.1557/S109257830000357410.1557/S1092578300003574 ↗
34. 10.1088/1361-6463/aaa69210.1088/1361-6463/aaa692 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.11.00910.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.11.009 ↗
36. 10.1007/s00604005005510.1007/s006040050055 ↗
37. 10.6028/jres.107.04910.6028/jres.107.049 ↗
38. 10.1021/cg500054w10.1021/cg500054w ↗
39. 10.1017/S143192761901229710.1017/S1431927619012297 ↗
40. 10.1017/S143192760808874010.1017/S1431927608088740 ↗
41. 10.1016/0009-2541(90)90140-310.1016/0009-2541(90)90140-3 ↗
42. The role of carbon film thickness in electron microprobe analysis
43. 10.6028/jres.107.04210.6028/jres.107.042 ↗
44. 10.2138/am.2005.142210.2138/am.2005.1422 ↗
45. 10.1088/0268-1242/26/6/06400510.1088/0268-1242/26/6/064005 ↗
46. 10.1002/sia.563410.1002/sia.5634 ↗
47. McKay, G & Seymour, R (1982). Electron microprobe analysis of trace elements in minerals at 10 PPM concentrations. Proceedings, Annual Conference - Microbeam Analysis Society.
48. 10.1016/S0022-0248(02)01348-910.1016/S0022-0248(02)01348-9 ↗
49. 10.1088/1361-6463/aba64c10.1088/1361-6463/aba64c ↗
50. 10.6028/jres.107.04310.6028/jres.107.043 ↗
51. 10.1088/1757-899X/304/1/01200110.1088/1757-899X/304/1/012001 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.11.01510.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.11.015 ↗
53. 10.6028/jres.107.05710.6028/jres.107.057 ↗
54. 10.1002/sca.2000010.1002/sca.20000 ↗
55. 10.1088/1757-899X/32/1/01201610.1088/1757-899X/32/1/012016 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.496444210.1063/1.4964442 ↗
57. 10.1063/1.486716510.1063/1.4867165 ↗
58. 10.1017/S143192761900040010.1017/S1431927619000400 ↗
59. 10.1088/1361-6641/aa58cf10.1088/1361-6641/aa58cf ↗
60. 10.1002/pssa.20120064810.1002/pssa.201200648 ↗
61. 10.1039/C9CC04707G10.1039/C9CC04707G ↗
62. 10.1116/1.494365810.1116/1.4943658 ↗