journal article·2016-06Open access

Segmentation Method of Time-Lapse Microscopy Images with the Focus on Biocompatibility Assessment

Jindřich Soukup, Petr Císař, Filip Šroubek

Microscopy and Microanalysis· Volume 22· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract Biocompatibility testing of new materials is often performed in vitro by measuring the growth rate of mammalian cancer cells in time-lapse images acquired by phase contrast microscopes. The growth rate is measured by tracking cell coverage, which requires an accurate automatic segmentation method. However, cancer cells have irregular shapes that change over time, the mottled background pattern is partially visible through the cells and the images contain artifacts such as halos. We developed a novel algorithm for cell segmentation that copes with the mentioned challenges. It is based on temporal differences of consecutive images and a combination of thresholding, blurring, and morphological operations. We tested the algorithm on images of four cell types acquired by two different microscopes, evaluated the precision of segmentation against manual segmentation performed by a human operator, and finally provided comparison with other freely available methods. We propose a new, fully automated method for measuring the cell growth rate based on fitting a coverage curve with the Verhulst population model. The algorithm is fast and shows accuracy comparable with manual segmentation. Most notably it can correctly separate live from dead cells.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cell Image Analysis Techniques · AI in cancer detection · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms
2. 10.1016/0014-4827(81)90036-710.1016/0014-4827(81)90036-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/0887-2333(90)90149-N10.1016/0887-2333(90)90149-N ↗
4. Cell segmentation using front vector flow guided active contours
5. Pan J. , Kanade T. & Chen M. (2010). Heterogeneous conditional random field: Realizing joint detection and segmentation of cell regions in microscopic images. In 2010 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June, pp. 2940–2947, IEEE. San Francisco, CA, USA, 15 June--17 June, 2010. Available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=5540037.
6. 10.1017/S143192761300161X10.1017/S143192761300161X ↗
7. 10.1186/1471-2121-11-2410.1186/1471-2121-11-24 ↗
8. 10.1109/TMI.2002.80629210.1109/TMI.2002.806292 ↗
9. Bradhurst C.J. , Boles W. & Yin Xiao Y.X. (2008). Segmentation of bone marrow stromal cells in phase contrast microscopy images. In 2008 23rd International Conference Image and Vision Computing New Zealand, pp. 1--6. IEEE, 2008. Available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4762144.
10. Learning to detect different types of cells under phase contrast microscopy
11. Yin Z. & Kanade T. (2011). Restoring artifact-free microscopy image sequences. In 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, Chicago, IL, USA, 30 March--2 April, 2011. pp. 909–913, IEEE.10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872551 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03558.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03558.x ↗
13. ISO 10993-5 (2009). Biological evaluation of medical devices. Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity.
14. Ersoy I. , Bunyak F. , Mackey M.A. & Palaniappan K. (2008). Cell segmentation using hessian-based detection and contour evolution with directional derivatives. In ICIP 2008. 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, vol. 2008, pp. 1804–1807, IEEE. San Diego, CA, USA, 12 October--15 October, 2008. Available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs/_all.jsp?arnumber=4712127.
15. Peng H. , Zhou X. , Li F. , Xia X. & Wong S.T.C. (2009). Integrating multiscale blob/curvilinear detector techniques and multi-level sets for automated segmentation of stem cell images. In ISBI’09. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, Boston, MA, USA, 28 June--1 July, 2009. pp. 1362–1365.
16. 10.1016/j.media.2011.12.00610.1016/j.media.2011.12.006 ↗
17. Soukup J. , Cisar P & Sroubek F. (2013). Segmentation of time-lapse images with focus on microscopy images of cells. In 17th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing – ICIAP 2013, vol. 8157, Part II of LNCS, Alfredo Petrosino (Ed.), pp. 71–80. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
18. 10.1038/nrc77510.1038/nrc775 ↗
19. Yin Z. , Bise R. , Chen M. & Kanade T. (2010). Cell segmentation in microscopy imagery using a bag of local Bayesian classifiers. In 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, Beijing, China, 20 September--24 September, 2010. pp. 125–128, IEEE.10.1109/ISBI.2010.5490399 ↗
20. Kanade T. , Yin Z. , Bise R. , Huh S. , Eom S. , Sandbothe M.F. & Chen M. (2011). Cell image analysis: Algorithms, system and applications. In 2011 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), January, pp. 374–381. Kona, HI, USA, 5 January--7 January, 2011. Available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm? arnumber=5711528.
21. Li K. , Miller E.D. , Weiss L.E. , Campbell P.G. & Kanade T. (2006). Online tracking of migrating and proliferating cells imaged with phase-contrast microscopy. In CVPRW’06. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, pp. 65–72, IEEE.
22. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.06.00210.1016/j.cmpb.2011.06.002 ↗
23. Notice sur la loi que la population suit dans son accroissement
24. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2012.03624.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.2012.03624.x ↗