journal article·2011-12

Compton Scattering Artifacts in Electron Excited X-Ray Spectra Measured with a Silicon Drift Detector

Nicholas W.M. Ritchie, Dale E. Newbury, Abigail P. Lindstrom

Microscopy and Microanalysis· Volume 17· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Artifacts are the nemesis of trace element analysis in electron-excited energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. Peaks that result from nonideal behavior in the detector or sample can fool even an experienced microanalyst into believing that they have trace amounts of an element that is not present. Many artifacts, such as the Si escape peak, absorption edges, and coincidence peaks, can be traced to the detector. Others, such as secondary fluorescence peaks and scatter peaks, can be traced to the sample. We have identified a new sample-dependent artifact that we attribute to Compton scattering of energetic X-rays generated in a small feature and subsequently scattered from a low atomic number matrix. It seems likely that this artifact has not previously been reported because it only occurs under specific conditions and represents a relatively small signal. However, with the advent of silicon drift detectors and their utility for trace element analysis, we anticipate that more people will observe it and possibly misidentify it. Though small, the artifact is not inconsequential. Under some conditions, it is possible to mistakenly identify the Compton scatter artifact as approximately 1% of an element that is not present.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · Nuclear Physics and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (11)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb03042.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb03042.x ↗
2. Uriano G.A. (1981). Standard Reference Material U-900. National Bureau of Standards Certificate of Analysis. Available at www-s.nist.gov/srmors/certificates/archive/U-900.pdf.
3. Salvat F. , Fernandez-Varea J.M. & Sempau J. (2009). PENELOPE-2008: A code system for Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport. NEA no. 6416. Issy-les-Moulineaux, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency.
4. 10.1145/362349.36237710.1145/362349.362377 ↗
5. 10.1038/122398b010.1038/122398b0 ↗
6. 10.1007/978-1-4615-0215-910.1007/978-1-4615-0215-9 ↗
7. Markowicz · 2002 · 1
8. Chantler C.T. , Olsen K. , Dragoset R.A. , Chang J. , Kishore A.R. , Kotochigova S.A. & Zucker D.S. (2005). X-Ray Form Factor, Attenuation and Scattering Tables. Technical Report. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available May 1, 2007 at www.physics.nist.gov/ffast.
9. McMaster W.H. , Del Grande N.K. , Mallett J.H. & Hubbell J.H. (1969). Compilation of X-ray cross sections. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCRL-50174 (section I 1970, section II 1969, section III 1969 and section IV 1969), University of California.
10. 10.1017/S143192760999040710.1017/S1431927609990407 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRev.21.48310.1103/PhysRev.21.483 ↗