Charge Contrast Imaging of Gibbsite Using the Variable Pressure SEM
Source abstract
Abstract
The variable pressure scanning electron microscope (VP-SEM) allows imaging of insulators without the need for a conductive coating, due to charge neutralization at the surface from recombination of positive ions and surface electrons. Varying certain parameters such as pressure, bias, and working distance creates incomplete neutralization, and localized charging develops called charge contrast. Although the exact mechanism creating charge contrast imaging (CCI) is unknown, it is agreed that it is related to an optimum charge compensation. The behavior of the CCI is still vague, which presents a problem for determining the mechanisms. This article provides user-friendly methods of finding the optimum levels of charge contrast in the VP-SEM. We show that the CCI is obtained at optimum operating conditions where the specimen current is between 2.5 nA and 3.5 nA. The specimen current is a function of secondary electrons (SE) emission and ionization potential, producing an ion flux. Therefore an optimum specimen current represents the balanced conditions of SE emission and ion flux. Controlling the pressure, working distance, bias, scan rate, and beam current allows the microscopist to set the specimen current at this optimum level for charge contrast imaging. All the work was performed on gibbsite using the S3000N VP-SEM from Hitachi.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · Iron oxide chemistry and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Danilatos, G.D. (1991).Review and outline of environmental SEM at present.J Microsc 162,391–402.10.1111/j.1365-2818.1991.tb03149.x ↗
2. Griffin, B.J. (2000).Charge contrast imaging of material growth and defects inESEM-linking electron emission and cathodoluminescence.Scanning 22,234.10.1002/sca.4950220402 ↗
3. Toth, M. , Phillips, M.R. , Thiel, B.L. , & Donald, A.M. (2002c).Electron imaging of dielectrics under simultaneous electron-ionirradiation.J Appl Phys 91,4479–4491.10.1063/1.1448875 ↗
4. Baroni, T.C. (2001).A microstructural investigation of gibbsite crystallization in bayerliquors.Ph.D. Thesis.University of Western Australia.
5. Farley, A.N. & Shah, J.S. (1990b).Primary considerations for image enhancement in high pressurescanning electron microscopy.J Microsc 158,389–401.10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb03010.x ↗
6. Farley, A.N. & Shah, J.S. (1990a).Primary considerations for image enhancement in high pressurescanning electron microscopy.J Microsc 158,379–388.10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb03009.x ↗
7. Cazaux, J. (1986).Some considerations on the electric field induced in insulators byelectron bombardement.J Appl Phys 59,1418–1430.10.1063/1.336493 ↗
8. Toth, M. , Phillips, M.R. , Craven, J.P. , Thiel, B.L. , & Donald, A.M. (2002b).Electric fields produced by electron irradiation of insulators in alow vacuum environment.J Appl Phys 91,4492–4499.10.1063/1.1448876 ↗
9. Watt, G.R. , Griffin, B.J. , & Kinny P.D .(2000).Charge contrast imaging of geological materials in theenvironmental scanning electron microscope.Am Mineral 85,1784–1794.10.2138/am-2000-11-1221 ↗
10. Toth, M. , Daniels, D.R. , Thiel, B.L. , & Donald, A.M. (2002a).Quantification of electron-ion recombination in anelectron-beam-irradiated gas capacitor.J Phys D: Appl Phys 35,1796–1804.10.1088/0022-3727/35/14/322 ↗
11. Thiel, B.L. , Bache, I.C. , Fletcher, A.L. , Meredith, P. , & Donald, A.M. (1997).An improved model for gaseous amplification in the environmentalSEM.J Microsc 187,143–157.10.1046/j.1365-2818.1997.2360794.x ↗
12. Danilatos, G.D. (1990).Mechanisms of detection and imaging in the ESEM.J Microsc 160,9–19.10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb03043.x ↗
13. Fletcher, A.L. , Thiel, B.L. , & Donald, A.M. (2000).Signal components in the environmental scanning electron microscope.J Microsc 196,26–34.
14. Toth, M. , Thiel, B.L. , & Donald, A.M. (2002d).On the role of electron-ion recombination in low vacuum scanningelectron microscopy.J Microsc 205,86–95.10.1046/j.0022-2720.2001.00968.x ↗
15. Goldstein, J.I. , Newbury, D.E. , Echlin, P. , Joy, D.C. , Romig, A.D. , Lyman, C.E. , & Lifshin, E. (1992).Scanning Electron Miroscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis.New York:Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4613-0491-3 ↗
16. Mohan, A. , Khanna, J. , Hwu, J. , & Joy, D.C. (1998).Secondary electron imaging in the Variable Pressure ScanningElectron Microscope.Scanning 20,436–441.10.1002/sca.1998.4950200603 ↗
17. Griffin, B.J. (1997).A new mechanism for the imaging of crystal structure innon-conductive materials: An application of charge-induced contrast inthe environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM).Microsc Microanal 3,1197–1198.10.1017/S1431927600012873 ↗
18. Toth, B.L. , Kucheyev, S.O. , Williams, J.S. , Jagadish, C. , Phillips, M.R. , & Li, G. (2000).Imaging charge trap distributions in GaN using environmentalscanning electron microscopy.Appl Phys Lett 77,1342–1344.10.1063/1.1290267 ↗
19. Moncrieff, D.A. , Robinson, V.N.E. , & Harris, L.B. (1978).Charge neutralisation of insulating surfaces in the SEM by gasionization.J Phys D: Appl Phys 11,2315–2325.10.1088/0022-3727/11/17/002 ↗
20. Farley, A.N. & Shah, J.S. (1991).High-pressure scanning electron microscopy of insulating materials:A new approach.J Microsc 164,107–126.10.1111/j.1365-2818.1991.tb03197.x ↗
21. Craven, J.P. , Baker, F.S. , Thiel, B.L. , & Donald, A.M. (2002).Consequences of positive ions upon imaging in low vacuum scanningelectron microscopy.J Microsc 205,96–105.10.1046/j.0022-2720.2001.00969.x ↗
22. Fletcher, A.L. , Thiel, B.L. , & Donald, A.M. (1997).Amplification measurements of alternative imaging gases in theenvironmental SEM.J Phys D: Appl Phys 30,2249–2257.10.1088/0022-3727/30/15/018 ↗