Wave Optical Modeling of the SEM Column From Source to Specimen
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Probe formation in scanning electron microscope (SEM) is often reduced to objective lens action modeling based on a point-spread function or Fourier transforms. In this study, we present the first complete wave optical modeling of the whole SEM column based on plane-by-plane propagation of the electron beam wavefunction without simplifying the optical system. We identify the challenges in plane-by-plane beam propagation and show how sampling limitations produce aliased results. Through a careful selection and combination of propagators, we have developed a general wave optical propagation method that is able to overcome the aliasing problem to achieve the appropriate probe widths. Using a two-step propagator, we show that it is possible to model the electron beam distribution throughout the column from the virtual source plane to the specimen plane. We also show that our results from the wave optical simulations are consistent with the geometrical theory of probe formation. Finally, as a direct application of this method, we demonstrated that the combined effect of aberrations in the condenser lens and the probe forming objective lens cannot be accurately represented using only the objective lens. Designing beam shaping experiments and studying the effect of partial coherence can be some novel applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
NanoImaging Lab, Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology , 54 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623 ,
ASML—HMI , Silicon Valley, San Jose, CA 95134 ,
Funding
ASML-HMI
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. SIMION ion optics simulations at atmospheric pressure10.1016/j.ijms.2005.03.010 ↗
2. Addition of different contributions to the charged particle probe size
3. Dr. Probe: A software for high-resolution STEM image simulation10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.06.003 ↗
4. Probe current, probe size, and the practical brightness for probe forming systems10.1116/1.2907780 ↗
5. Comparison of FDM, FEM and BEM for electrostatic charged particle optics10.1016/S0168-9002(98)01563-0 ↗
6. Edwards · 2020 · 14110.1016/bs.aiep.2020.06.005215 ↗
7. Gerrard · 1994
8. Goodman · 2017
9. Hawkes · 2022
10. Automatic aberration-correction system for scanning electron microscopy10.1016/j.mee.2010.12.040 ↗
11. Jon · 201710.1201/9781420045550 ↗
12. Joy · 2007 · 10710.1007/978-0-387-72972-5_3 ↗
13. Modeling SEM column, probe formation, and imaging using Fourier optics10.1017/S1431927621011466 ↗
14. SEM nano: An electron wave optical simulation for the scanning electron microscope10.1017/S1431927622000198 ↗
15. Klein · 1986 · 193
16. On the calculation of SEM and FIB beam profiles10.1017/S1431927615013380 ↗
17. Chromatic aberration correction for atomic resolution TEM imaging from 20 to 80 kV10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.076101 ↗
18. Simulation software for designing electron and ion beam equipment10.1016/j.mee.2006.01.076 ↗
19. Visualizing astigmatism in the SEM electron probe10.1017/S1431927618003513 ↗
20. Interferometric methods for mapping static electric and magnetic fields10.1016/j.crhy.2014.01.005 ↗
21. Reimer · 1998 · 1310.1007/978-3-540-38967-5_2 ↗
22. Beam shaping and probe characterization in the scanning electron microscope10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113268 ↗
23. Shaping of electron beams using sculpted thin films10.1021/acsphotonics.1c00951 ↗
24. Rouse · 2018 · 12910.1016/bs.aiep.2018.09.001 ↗
25. Properties of the imaging performance of an electron optical system for SEM10.1016/j.nima.2011.01.084 ↗
26. A new way of measuring microscope aberrations10.1016/S0304-3991(99)00163-1 ↗
27. Nanostructuring of electron beams10.1088/1402-4896/aaf258 ↗
28. Prospects for electron beam aberration correction using sculpted phase masks10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.02.002 ↗
29. Voelz · 201110.1117/3.858456 ↗
30. Digital simulation of scalar optical diffraction: Revisiting chirp function sampling criteria and consequences10.1364/AO.48.006132 ↗
31. Analysis of numerical diffraction calculation methods: From the perspective of phase space optics and the sampling theorem10.1364/JOSAA.401908 ↗
32. Development of the program EOD for design in electron and ion microscopy. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers10.1016/j.nima.2010.12.198 ↗