Identifying Sample Provenance From SEM/EDS Automated Particle Analysis via Few-Shot Learning Coupled With Similarity Graph Clustering
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Automated particle analysis (APA) provides a vast amount of compositional data via energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy along with size and shape data via scanning electron microscopy for individual particles in a sample. In many instances, APA data are leveraged to support identification of the source of a sample based on the detection of particles of a specific composition. Often, the particles that provide context make up a minuscule portion of the sample. Additionally, the interpretation of complex samples can be difficult due to the diversity of compositions both in the mixture and within a particle. In this work, we demonstrate a method to compute and cluster similarity graphs that describe inter-particle relationships within a sample using a multi-modal few-shot learning neural network. As a proof-of-concept, we show that samples known to have been exposed to gunshot residue can be distinguished from samples occasionally mistaken for gunshot residue. Our workflow builds upon standard APA techniques and data processing methods to unveil additional information in a readily interpretable and quantitatively comparable format.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Mineral Processing and Grinding
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Security Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory , 902 Battelle Boulevard, Richland, WA 99352 , USA
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM International · 2017
2. Computational solutions for omics data10.1038/nrg3433 ↗
3. Examination of firearm gunpowders by scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray analysis10.1111/1556-4029.14621 ↗
4. Interpol review of gunshot residue 2019 to 202110.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100302 ↗
5. Defining and exploring chemical spaces10.1016/j.trechm.2020.11.004 ↗
6. Multiple equilibria in complex chemical reaction networks: II. The species-reaction graph10.1137/050634177 ↗
7. Diversity and chemical library networks of large data sets10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01013 ↗
8. Trends in composition, collection, persistence, and analysis of IGSR and OGSR: A review10.1016/j.forc.2020.100250 ↗
9. Gal · 2016
10. Goldstein · 2018 · 23510.1007/978-1-4939-6676-9_17 ↗
11. Automated particle analysis using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) to characterize inhaled particulate matter (PM) in biopsied lung tissue10.1093/micmic/ozac015 ↗
12. Spec2Vec: Improved mass spectral similarity scoring through learning of structural relationships10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008724 ↗
13. MS2DeepScore: A novel deep learning similarity measure to compare tandem mass spectra10.1186/s13321-021-00558-4 ↗
14. matchms-processing and similarity evaluation of mass spectrometry data10.21105/joss.02411 ↗
15. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks10.1145/3065386 ↗
16. Use of an automated SEM to detect laboratory contamination10.1017/S1431927613007320 ↗
17. Liu · 2008
18. Method to characterize inorganic particulates in lung tissue biopsies using field emission scanning electron microscopy10.1080/15376516.2018.1449042 ↗
19. Macindoe · 2010
20. A clustering coefficient for complete weighted networks10.1017/nws.2014.26 ↗
21. Chemical compound classification by elemental signatures in Castle dust using SEM automated X-ray particle analysis10.1017/S1431927618004087 ↗
22. Pirrie · 2009 · 41110.1007/978-1-4020-9204-6_26 ↗
23. Unlocking the applications of automated mineral analysis10.1111/j.1365-2451.2011.00818.x ↗
24. What is the best way to extract a k-ratio from an EDS spectrum?10.1093/micmic/ozad067.102 ↗
25. Proposed practices for validating the performance of instruments used for automated inorganic gunshot residue analysis10.1016/j.forc.2020.100252 ↗
26. Ritchie · 2021
27. Speciation of nanocatalysts using X-ray absorption spectroscopy assisted by machine learning10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c00571 ↗
28. Visualizing chemical space networks with RDKit and NetworkX10.1186/s13321-022-00664-x ↗
29. SEM-based automated mineralogy and its application in geo- and material sciences10.3390/min10111004 ↗
30. Gunshot residue detection technologies—A review10.1186/s41935-021-00223-9 ↗
31. A study of the effect of working parameters and validation of SEM/EDS method for determination of elemental composition of commonly encountered GSR samples in shooting events in Kosovo10.1111/1556-4029.14803 ↗
32. Brake linings: A source of non-GSR particles containing lead, barium, and antimony10.1520/JFS2001093 ↗
33. Gunshot residue and brakepads: Compositional and morphological considerations for forensic casework10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.11.024 ↗
34. A tutorial on spectral clustering10.1007/s11222-007-9033-z ↗
35. A deep siamese network with hybrid convolutional feature extraction module for change detection based on multi-sensor remote sensing images10.3390/rs12020205 ↗
36. Deep learning-based method for compound identification in NMR spectra of mixtures10.3390/molecules27123653 ↗
37. Application of graph theory to chemical kinetics. 3. Topological specificity of multiroute reaction mechanisms10.1021/ci950268n ↗