Determining the Composition of a Mixed Material with Synthetic Data
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Determining the composition of a mixed material is an open problem that has attracted the interest of researchers in many fields. In our recent work, we proposed a novel approach to determine the composition of a mixed material using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). In machine learning, a model “learns” a specific task for which it is designed through data. Hence, obtaining a dataset of mixed materials is required to develop CNNs for the task of estimating the composition. However, the proposed method instead creates the synthetic data of mixed materials generated from using only images of pure materials present in those mixtures. Thus, it eliminates the prohibitive cost and tedious process of collecting images of mixed materials. The motivation for this study is to provide mathematical details of the proposed approach in addition to extensive experiments and analyses. We examine the approach on two datasets to demonstrate the ease of extending the proposed approach to any mixtures. We perform experiments to demonstrate that the proposed approach can accurately determine the presence of the materials, and sufficiently estimate the precise composition of a mixed material. Moreover, we provide analyses to strengthen the validation and benefits of the proposed approach.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · Mineral Processing and Grinding
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Utah Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, , Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute , Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
University of Utah Nuclear Engineering Program, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, , Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
University of Southern California Department of Computer Science, , Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
Funding
Department of Homeland Security, Domestic Nuclear Detection Office
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Arjovsky · 2017
2. Brock · 2019
3. An algorithm for total variation minimization and applications10.1023/B:JMIV.0000011321.19549.88 ↗
4. Deeplab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected CRFs10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2699184 ↗
5. Gatys · 2015
6. Gatys · 2016
7. Gatys · 2017
8. Girshick · 2015
9. Goodfellow · 2014
10. Quantifying impurity effects on the surface morphology of α-U3O810.1021/acs.analchem.9b02013 ↗
11. He · 2016
12. Identifying surface morphological characteristics to differentiate between mixtures of U3O8 synthesized from ammonium diuranate and uranyl peroxide10.1515/ract-2019-3140 ↗
13. Huang · 2017
14. Ioffe · 2015
15. Isola · 2017
16. Iyer · 2019
17. Karras · 2018
18. Karras · 2019
19. Phase mapping in EBSD using convolutional neural networks10.1017/S1431927620001488 ↗
20. Li · 2017
21. Learning to estimate the composition of a mixture with synthetic data10.1017/S1431927621008990 ↗
22. A new approach for quantifying morphological features of U3O8 for nuclear forensics using a deep learning model10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.01.042 ↗
23. Data augmentation in microscopic images for material data mining
24. Machine learning and computer vision for the classification of carbon nanotube and nanofiber structures from transmission electron microscopy data10.1017/S1431927619001727 ↗
25. Odena · 2017
26. Paszke · 2019
27. Microstructural classification of unirradiated LiAlO2 pellets by deep learning methods10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109728 ↗
28. Ronneberger · 2015
29. Optimization of SEM-EDS to determine the C–A–S–H composition in matured cement paste samples10.1016/j.matchar.2016.11.041 ↗
30. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y ↗
31. Determining surface composition of mixed oxides with pH10.1016/j.jcis.2014.07.050 ↗
32. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for determination of uranium in thorium–uranium mixed oxide fuel materials10.1016/j.talanta.2008.12.046 ↗
33. Uranium oxide synthetic pathway discernment through thermal decomposition and morphological analysis10.1515/ract-2018-3033 ↗
34. Simonyan · 2015
35. Singh · 2018
36. Deep learning for sparse scanning electron microscopy10.1017/S1431927619001521 ↗
37. Trapezoidal rule
38. Deep learning as a tool for image denoising and drift correction10.1017/S1431927619001685 ↗
39. Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment
40. Robust deep-learning based autofocus score prediction for scanning electron microscope10.1017/S1431927620015573 ↗