Three-Dimensional X-Ray Photoelectron Tomography on the Nanoscale: Limits of Data Processing by Principal Component Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In a previous article, we studied the influence of spectral noise on a new method for three-dimensional X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (3D XPS) imaging, which is based on analysis of the XPS peak shape [Hajati, S., Tougaard, S., Walton, J. & Fairley, N. (2008). Surf Sci602, 3064–3070]. Here, we study in more detail the influence of noise reduction by principal component analysis (PCA) on 3D XPS images of carbon contamination of a patterned oxidized silicon sample and on 3D XPS images of Ag covered by a nanoscale patterned octadiene layer. PCA is very efficient for noise reduction, and using only the three most significant PCA factors to reconstruct the spectra restores essentially all physical information in both the intensity and shape of the XPS spectra. The corresponding signal-to-noise improvement was estimated to be equivalent to a reduction by a factor of 200 in the required data acquisition time. A small additional amount of information is obtained by using up to five PCA factors, but due to the increased noise level, this information can only be extracted if the intensity of the start and end points for each spectrum are obtained as averages over several energy points.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. d'Agostino · 1990
2. 10.1016/j.elspec.2005.07.00110.1016/j.elspec.2005.07.001 ↗
3. Fairley N. (2008). CasaXPS Version 2.3.14: Software package for data processing. Available at http://www.casaxps.com.
4. 10.1016/j.susc.2008.08.00510.1016/j.susc.2008.08.005 ↗
5. What nano-physical properties can be determined by analysis of elastic peak accompanied by its inelastic background tail in XPS and AES spectra?
6. 10.1116/1.186405310.1116/1.1864053 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.elspec.2005.02.00310.1016/j.elspec.2005.02.003 ↗
8. Briggs · 2003
9. 10.1002/sia.74020060210.1002/sia.740200602 ↗
10. Geladi · 1996
11. 10.1016/j.susc.2006.05.02010.1016/j.susc.2006.05.020 ↗
12. 10.1002/sia.263310.1002/sia.2633 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00216-009-3401-910.1007/s00216-009-3401-9 ↗
14. Jolliffe · 2002
15. 10.1016/j.susc.2007.06.00110.1016/j.susc.2007.06.001 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00216-009-3312-910.1007/s00216-009-3312-9 ↗
17. Malinowski · 1980
18. 10.1002/sia.256510.1002/sia.2565 ↗
19. 10.1021/ac60214a04710.1021/ac60214a047 ↗
20. 10.1002/sia.219910.1002/sia.2199 ↗
21. 10.1116/1.57703710.1116/1.577037 ↗
22. 10.1116/1.57478910.1116/1.574789 ↗
23. 10.1116/1.57996310.1116/1.579963 ↗
24. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199703)25:3<137::AID-SIA230>3.0.CO;2-L10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199703)25:3<137::AID-SIA230>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
25. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199804)26:4<249::AID-SIA368>3.0.CO;2-A10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199804)26:4<249::AID-SIA368>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
26. 10.1116/1.156404010.1116/1.1564040 ↗
27. 10.1116/1.479524610.1116/1.4795246 ↗
28. 10.1002/sia.74014110910.1002/sia.740141109 ↗
29. 10.1002/sia.74013020210.1002/sia.740130202 ↗
30. 10.1002/sia.74021030210.1002/sia.740210302 ↗
31. 10.1016/0368-2048(90)85022-210.1016/0368-2048(90)85022-2 ↗
32. 10.1002/sia.238110.1002/sia.2381 ↗
33. 10.1039/b311256j10.1039/b311256j ↗