A Model Ni–Al–Mo Superalloy Studied by Ultraviolet Pulsed-Laser-Assisted Local-Electrode Atom-Probe Tomography
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study investigates the effects of the charge-state ratio of evaporated ions on the accuracy of local-electrode atom-probe (LEAP) tomographic compositional and structural analyses, which employs a picosecond ultraviolet pulsed laser. Experimental results demonstrate that the charge-state ratio is a better indicator of the best atom-probe tomography (APT) experimental conditions compared with laser pulse energy. The thermal tails in the mass spectra decrease significantly, and the mass resolving power (m/Δm) increases by 87.5 and 185.7% at full-width half-maximum and full-width tenth-maximum, respectively, as the laser pulse energy is increased from 5 to 30 pJ/pulse. The measured composition of this alloy depends on the charge-state ratio of the evaporated ions, and the most accurate composition is obtained when Ni2+/Ni+ is in the range of 0.3–20. The γ(f.c.c.)/γ'(L12) interface is quantitatively more diffuse when determined from the measured concentration profiles for higher laser pulse energies. Conclusions of the APT compositional and structural analyses utilizing the same suitable charge-state ratio are more comparable than those collected with the same laser pulse energy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.11.01710.1016/j.ultramic.2008.11.017 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-1-4614-3436-810.1007/978-1-4614-3436-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1369-7021(07)70306-110.1016/S1369-7021(07)70306-1 ↗
4. 10.1017/S143192761006024110.1017/S1431927610060241 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.475392910.1063/1.4753929 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.300601710.1063/1.3006017 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.369546110.1063/1.3695461 ↗
8. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.37.052506.08420010.1146/annurev.matsci.37.052506.084200 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.219141210.1063/1.2191412 ↗
10. 10.1007/978-1-4615-4281-010.1007/978-1-4615-4281-0 ↗
11. 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90154-810.1016/0001-6160(84)90154-8 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.45159410.1063/1.451594 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.12.03210.1016/j.ultramic.2010.12.032 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.03710.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.037 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.05410.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.054 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.04.01710.1016/j.ultramic.2010.04.017 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.04610.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.046 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.114321410.1063/1.1143214 ↗
19. 10.1557/mrs2009.19410.1557/mrs2009.194 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.09.01610.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.09.016 ↗
21. 10.1017/S143192761101189510.1017/S1431927611011895 ↗
22. 10.1017/S143192761200118310.1017/S1431927612001183 ↗
23. Parratt · 1966
24. 10.1016/j.mser.2010.05.00110.1016/j.mser.2010.05.001 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.32939010.1063/1.329390 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.06.00510.1016/j.ultramic.2011.06.005 ↗
27. 10.1002/adem.20060022510.1002/adem.200600225 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.362264710.1063/1.3622647 ↗
29. 10.1016/0039-6028(66)90055-010.1016/0039-6028(66)90055-0 ↗
30. 10.1007/978-1-4899-6513-4_310.1007/978-1-4899-6513-4_3 ↗
31. 10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70184-X10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70184-X ↗
32. 10.1017/S143192760707086910.1017/S1431927607070869 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.02910.1016/j.msea.2008.01.029 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2007.02.02510.1016/j.ultramic.2007.02.025 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.03810.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.038 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.05.04310.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.05.043 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.03210.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.032 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.204853610.1063/1.2048536 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.169023410.1063/1.1690234 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.03410.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.034 ↗
41. 10.1116/1.57101710.1116/1.571017 ↗
42. Analysis of three-dimensional atom-probe data by the proximity histogram10.1007/S100050010051 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.270975810.1063/1.2709758 ↗
44. 10.1016/0039-6028(82)90434-410.1016/0039-6028(82)90434-4 ↗
45. 10.1017/S143192761401348810.1017/S1431927614013488 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.33652710.1063/1.336527 ↗
47. 10.1038/nmat184510.1038/nmat1845 ↗
48. 10.1002/sia.248810.1002/sia.2488 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.353181610.1063/1.3531816 ↗
50. Plotnikov · 2015
51. 10.1063/1.358356910.1063/1.3583569 ↗
52. 10.1063/1.283762610.1063/1.2837626 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.03.01410.1016/j.jmmm.2008.03.014 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.10.00110.1016/j.ultramic.2008.10.001 ↗
55. 10.1063/1.354449610.1063/1.3544496 ↗
56. Sudbrack · 2004
57. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.04610310.1103/PhysRevLett.99.046103 ↗
58. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/12/12550210.1088/0022-3727/42/12/125502 ↗
59. 10.1016/0039-6028(84)90093-110.1016/0039-6028(84)90093-1 ↗
60. The quantitative-analysis of copper in iron based alloys
61. 10.1063/1.298748310.1063/1.2987483 ↗
62. 10.1017/S143192760808096310.1017/S1431927608080963 ↗