journal article·2020-10

Application of Blind Deconvolution Based on the New Weighted L1-norm Regularization with Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers in Light Microscopy Images

Ji-Youn Kim, Kyuseok Kim, Youngjin Lee

Microscopy and Microanalysis· Volume 26· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and evaluate a blind-deconvolution framework using the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMMs) incorporated with weighted L1-norm regularization for light microscopy (LM) images. A presimulation study was performed using the Siemens star phantom prior to conducting the actual experiments. Subsequently, the proposed algorithm and a total generalized variation-based (TGV-based) method were applied to cross-sectional images of a mouse molar captured at 40× and 400× on-microscope magnifications and the results compared, and the resulting images were compared. Both simulation and experimental results confirmed that the proposed deblurring algorithm effectively restored the LM images, as evidenced by the quantitative evaluation metrics. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the proposed deblurring algorithm can efficiently improve the quality of LM images.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Image Processing Techniques and Applications · Image and Signal Denoising Methods · Advanced Image Processing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41598-019-53875-y10.1038/s41598-019-53875-y ↗
2. 10.1137/10078585510.1137/100785855 ↗
3. Ren, D (2018). Blur kernel estimation and image restoration methods for blind deconvolution. PhD Dissertations. Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
4. 10.1016/S0091-679X(03)72017-210.1016/S0091-679X(03)72017-2 ↗
5. 10.1080/1052029090290880210.1080/10520290902908802 ↗
6. 10.1109/83.58523910.1109/83.585239 ↗
7. Proximal algorithms
8. 10.1109/79.48926810.1109/79.489268 ↗
9. 10.1109/EUVIP.2018.861169310.1109/EUVIP.2018.8611693 ↗
10. 10.1109/TIP.2003.81986110.1109/TIP.2003.819861 ↗
11. 10.1109/TIP.2013.225835410.1109/TIP.2013.2258354 ↗
12. 10.1109/TIP.2017.276426110.1109/TIP.2017.2764261 ↗
13. From image deblurring to optimal investments: Maximum likelihood solutions for positive linear inverse problems10.1111/j.2517-6161.1993.tb01925.x ↗
14. 10.1080/10739149.2016.123626910.1080/10739149.2016.1236269 ↗
15. A blind deconvolution approach to ultrasound imaging10.1109/TUFFC.2012.2187 ↗
16. Dolui, S & Michailovich, O (2011). Blind deconvolution of medical ultrasound images using variable splitting and proximal point methods. In 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro (ISBI 2011), April, Chicago, IL, USA.
17. 10.1109/83.14860410.1109/83.148604 ↗
18. A general framework for denoising phaseless diffraction measurements
19. 10.1109/TCI.2016.262928610.1109/TCI.2016.2629286 ↗
20. Deep convolutional neural network for image deconvolution
21. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.2910.1038/nphoton.2015.29 ↗
22. 10.1186/1475-925X-14-S1-S1510.1186/1475-925X-14-S1-S15 ↗
23. 10.1109/TIP.2013.228487310.1109/TIP.2013.2284873 ↗
24. 10.1109/79.58136310.1109/79.581363 ↗
25. 10.1109/TIP.2007.91802810.1109/TIP.2007.918028 ↗
26. 10.12785/amis/08064410.12785/amis/080644 ↗
27. 10.1016/0010-4809(71)90034-610.1016/0010-4809(71)90034-6 ↗
28. 10.1109/TIP.2003.81425510.1109/TIP.2003.814255 ↗
29. 10.1145/1141911.114195610.1145/1141911.1141956 ↗
30. 10.1118/1.490126510.1118/1.4901265 ↗
31. 10.1109/TIP.2011.215822910.1109/TIP.2011.2158229 ↗
32. 10.1109/PROC.1975.980010.1109/PROC.1975.9800 ↗
33. A method for detecting microcalcifications in digital mammograms10.1007/BF03168677 ↗
34. Campisi · 2007