journal article·2019-08

Evaluation of Nanomechanical Properties of Tomato Root by Atomic Force Microscopy

D. E. Nicolás-Álvarez, J. A. Andraca-Adame, J. J. Chanona-Pérez, J. V. Méndez-Méndez, S. Cárdenas-Pérez, A. Rodríguez-Pulido

Microscopy and Microanalysis· Volume 25· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Here, different tissue surfaces of tomato root were characterized employing atomic force microscopy on day 7 and day 21 of growth through Young's modulus and plasticity index. These parameters provide quantitative information regarding the mechanical behavior of the tomato root under fresh conditions in different locations of the cross-section of root [cell surface of the epidermis, parenchyma (Pa), and vascular bundles (Vb)]. The results show that the mechanical parameters depend on the indented region, tissue type, and growth time. Thereby, the stiffness increases in the cell surface of epidermal tissue with increasing growth time (from 9.19 ± 0.68 to 13.90 ± 1.68 MPa) and the cell surface of Pa tissue displays the opposite behavior (from 1.74 ± 0.49 to 0.48 ± 0.55); the stiffness of cell surfaces of Vb tissue changes from 10.60 ± 0.58 to 6.37 ± 0.53 MPa, all cases showed a statistical difference (p < 0.05). Viscoelastic behavior dominates the mechanical forces in the tomato root. The current study is a contribution to a better understanding of the cell mechanics behavior of different tomato root tissues during growth.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tree Root and Stability Studies · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1023/A:101527170759110.1023/A:1015271707591 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tifs.2007.10.00310.1016/j.tifs.2007.10.003 ↗
3. FAO (2016). World food and agriculture. http://www.fao.org (accessed 18 March 2018).
4. 10.1063/1.490609410.1063/1.4906094 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.06.04610.1016/j.bpj.2012.06.046 ↗
6. 10.3390/s13091217510.3390/s130912175 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.02191610.1103/PhysRevE.85.021916 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.01110.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.011 ↗
9. Utilization of seaweed Sargassum liebmanii extract as a stimulant of germination of Pachyrhizus erosus
10. 10.12693/APhysPolA.115.54810.12693/APhysPolA.115.548 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.05710.1016/j.cub.2011.08.057 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.catena.2016.03.03810.1016/j.catena.2016.03.038 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ifset.2016.11.00410.1016/j.ifset.2016.11.004 ↗
14. 10.1557/jmr.2011.25210.1557/jmr.2011.252 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.08.03210.1016/j.semcdb.2017.08.032 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.05.04410.1016/j.carbpol.2018.05.044 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.06.02210.1016/j.semcdb.2017.06.022 ↗
18. Wolff · 1976
19. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04649.x10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04649.x ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ifset.2016.02.00410.1016/j.ifset.2016.02.004 ↗
21. Niklas · 2006
22. 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.07.00610.1016/j.tplants.2009.07.006 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0167-9317(03)00341-110.1016/S0167-9317(03)00341-1 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.06.00410.1016/j.tplants.2010.06.004 ↗
25. Esau, K (2006). Anatomía Vegetal. Meristemos, células y tejidos de las plantas: su estructura, función y desarrollo. OMEGA. 3 edición. 614 pp.
26. 10.1093/jxb/err42810.1093/jxb/err428 ↗
27. 10.1016/B978-0-12-802104-0.00004-410.1016/B978-0-12-802104-0.00004-4 ↗