journal article·2016-06

Determining Projections of Grain Boundaries from Diffraction Data in Transmission Electron Microscope

Ákos K. Kiss, János L. Lábár

Microscopy and Microanalysis· Volume 22· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Grain boundaries (GB) are characterized by disorientation of the neighboring grains and the direction of the boundary plane between them. A new approach presented here determines the projection of GB that can be used to determine the latter one. The novelty is that an additional parameter of GB is quantified in addition to the ones provided by the orientation maps, namely the width of the projection of the GB is measured from the same set of diffraction patterns that were recorded for the orientation map, without the need to take any additional images. The diffraction patterns are collected in nanobeam diffraction mode in a transmission electron microscope, pixel-by-pixel, from an area containing two neighboring grains and the boundary between them. In our case, the diffraction patterns were recorded using the beam scanning function of a commercially available system (ASTAR). Our method is based on non-negative matrix factorization applied to the mentioned set of diffraction patterns. The method is encoded in a MATLAB environment, making the results easy to interpret and visualize. The measured GB-projection width is used to determine the orientation of the GB-plane, as given in the study by Kiss et al.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0304-3991(87)90080-510.1016/0304-3991(87)90080-5 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00181-210.1016/S1359-6454(03)00181-2 ↗
3. Buciu I. & Pitas I. (2004). Application of non-negative and local non negative matrix factorization to facial expression recognition. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 23–26 August 2004; Cambridge, UK; pp. 288–291.10.1109/ICPR.2004.1334109 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0304-3991(97)00024-710.1016/S0304-3991(97)00024-7 ↗
5. Smaragdis P. & Brown J.C. (2003). Non-negative matrix factorization for polyphonic music transcription. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, 177–180. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics; 19–22 October 2001; New Paltz, New York.10.1109/ASPAA.2003.1285860 ↗
6. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.729.9710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.729.97 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0040-1951(97)00115-710.1016/S0040-1951(97)00115-7 ↗
8. 10.1017/S143192761500011210.1017/S1431927615000112 ↗
9. Forwood · 1991
10. Lee · 2001 · 556
11. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.04510.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.045 ↗
12. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.186.710.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.186.7 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11661-007-9418-910.1007/s11661-007-9418-9 ↗
14. 10.1162/neco.2007.19.10.275610.1162/neco.2007.19.10.2756 ↗
15. Randle · 1993
16. 10.1002/env.317005020310.1002/env.3170050203 ↗
17. 10.1038/ncomms826710.1038/ncomms8267 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1359-6462(01)00975-710.1016/S1359-6462(01)00975-7 ↗
19. 10.1007/978-1-4419-9583-410.1007/978-1-4419-9583-4 ↗
20. 10.1107/S056773947400043X10.1107/S056773947400043X ↗
21. 10.1002/pssa.221031025110.1002/pssa.2210310251 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.csda.2006.11.00610.1016/j.csda.2006.11.006 ↗
23. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization10.1038/44565 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11661-004-0147-z10.1007/s11661-004-0147-z ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.030853110110.1073/pnas.0308531101 ↗
26. 10.1038/nmat240610.1038/nmat2406 ↗
27. Automatic crystal orientation and phase mapping in TEM by precession diffraction
28. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100002910.1371/journal.pcbi.1000029 ↗