Monte Carlo Simulation of Characteristic Secondary Fluorescence in Electron Probe Microanalysis of Homogeneous Samples Using the Splitting Technique
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) is based on the comparison of characteristic intensities induced by monoenergetic electrons. When the electron beam ionizes inner atomic shells and these ionizations cause the emission of characteristic X-rays, secondary fluorescence can occur, originating from ionizations induced by X-ray photons produced by the primary electron interactions. As detectors are unable to distinguish the origin of these characteristic X-rays, Monte Carlo simulation of radiation transport becomes a determinant tool in the study of this fluorescence enhancement. In this work, characteristic secondary fluorescence enhancement in EPMA has been studied by using the splitting routines offered by PENELOPE 2008 as a variance reduction alternative. This approach is controlled by a single parameter NSPLIT, which represents the desired number of X-ray photon replicas. The dependence of the uncertainties associated with secondary intensities on NSPLIT was studied as a function of the accelerating voltage and the sample composition in a simple binary alloy in which this effect becomes relevant. The achieved efficiencies for the simulated secondary intensities bear a remarkable improvement when increasing the NSPLIT parameter; although in most cases an NSPLIT value of 100 is sufficient, some less likely enhancements may require stronger splitting in order to increase the efficiency associated with the simulation of secondary intensities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Kahn H. & Harris T.E. (1951). Estimation of particle transmission by random sampling. Natl Bur Stand Appl Math Ser 12, 27–30.
2. 10.1002/xrs.47110.1002/xrs.471 ↗
3. 10.1017/S143192760707935410.1017/S1431927607079354 ↗
4. 10.1017/S143192760707641610.1017/S1431927607076416 ↗
5. Salvat · 2009
6. 10.2138/am-2003-011510.2138/am-2003-0115 ↗
7. Scott · 1995
8. 10.1007/s00604-006-0508-y10.1007/s00604-006-0508-y ↗
9. 10.1007/978-1-4613-1059-4_1810.1007/978-1-4613-1059-4_18 ↗
10. 10.1088/0022-3727/41/10/10530410.1088/0022-3727/41/10/105304 ↗
11. 10.1017/S143192760808178610.1017/S1431927608081786 ↗
12. 10.1088/1757-899X/7/1/01200810.1088/1757-899X/7/1/012008 ↗
13. 10.1088/0022-3727/4/9/32510.1088/0022-3727/4/9/325 ↗
14. 10.1002/sia.211410.1002/sia.2114 ↗
15. 10.1007/978-1-4615-0215-910.1007/978-1-4615-0215-9 ↗
16. 10.1002/sia.209610.1002/sia.2096 ↗
17. 10.1017/S143192761400526110.1017/S1431927614005261 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.154515410.1063/1.1545154 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.36747310.1063/1.367473 ↗
20. 10.1088/0508-3443/16/7/30110.1088/0508-3443/16/7/301 ↗
21. Reed · 1993
22. 10.1002/xrs.130016060510.1002/xrs.1300160605 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.sab.2012.12.00710.1016/j.sab.2012.12.007 ↗