journal article·2017-06

Overcoming Peak Overlaps in Titanium- and Vanadium-Bearing Materials with Multiple Linear Least Squares Fitting

Michael Mengason, Nicholas Ritchie

Microscopy and Microanalysis· Volume 23· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The evolution of the energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) from the lithium-drifted silicon detector [Si(Li)] to the silicon drift detector (SDD) has created new opportunities in the field of electron probe X-ray microanalysis. The SDD permits operation at significantly higher count rates than the Si(Li) and also provides a more stable energy scale. X-ray spectra captured by EDS can now be analyzed qualitatively or quantitatively under the same beam conditions as used for wavelength dispersive spectrometry (WDS). Standards-based quantitative EDS (SB-Quant-EDS) can thus provide analyses that are accurate and precise for an ever growing number of materials measurement problems. In this study, we analyze NIST research glasses with “known” nominal concentrations of titanium (Ti) and vanadium (V) to evaluate the external reproducibility of the SB-Quant-EDS technique in the presence of severe peak overlaps. We additionally analyze several naturally occurring oxide minerals by WDS and EDS simultaneously and evaluate the outputs of these two methods when quantifying the same analytical volume within the sample.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Goldstein J. , Newbury D. , Joy D. , Lyman C. , Echlin P. , Lifshin E. , Sawyer L. & Michael J.R. (2003). Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis, 3rd ed., New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.10.1007/978-1-4615-0215-9 ↗
2. Donachie · 2000 · 5510.31399/asm.tb.ttg2.t61120055 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10853-014-8685-210.1007/s10853-014-8685-2 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11661-010-0237-z10.1007/s11661-010-0237-z ↗
5. Schamber · 1997 · 241
6. 10.1017/S143192761400518210.1017/S1431927614005182 ↗
7. 10.1017/S143192761200110910.1017/S1431927612001109 ↗
8. 10.1017/S143192761101226810.1017/S1431927611012268 ↗
9. Donovan J.J. , Kremser D. & Fournelle J.H. (2012). Probe for EPMA: Acquisition, Automation, and Analysis, Version 11.4.5. Eugene, Oregon: Probe Software, Inc www.probesoftware.com.
10. 10.1016/j.msec.2005.08.03210.1016/j.msec.2005.08.032 ↗
11. 10.1017/S143192761600073810.1017/S1431927616000738 ↗
12. 10.1017/S155192951100085X10.1017/S155192951100085X ↗
13. US Geological Survey (2016). Mineral Commodity Summaries 2016: U.S. Geological Survey, 202 p. https://doi.org//10.3133/70140094.
14. 10.1021/ac301843h10.1021/ac301843h ↗
15. Ritchie N.W.M. (2015). NIST DTSA II public domain software, version: Iona 2016-04-25. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available at http://www.cstl.nist.gov/div837/837.02/epq/dtsa2/index.html (retrieved April 25, 2016).
16. 10.1017/S143192761301269510.1017/S1431927613012695 ↗