Segmenting Microscopy Images of Multi-Well Plates Based on Image Contrast
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Image segmentation is a key process in analyzing biological images. However, it is difficult to detect the differences between foreground and background when the image is unevenly illuminated. The unambiguous segmenting of multi-well plate microscopy images with various uneven illuminations is a challenging problem. Currently, no publicly available method adequately solves these various problems in bright-field multi-well plate images. Here, we propose a new method based on contrast values which removes the need for illumination correction. The presented method is effective enough to distinguish foreground and therefore a model organism (Caenorhabditis elegans) from an unevenly illuminated microscope image. In addition, the method also can solve a variety of problems caused by different uneven illumination scenarios. By applying this methodology across a wide range of multi-well plate microscopy images, we show that our approach can consistently analyze images with uneven illuminations with unparalleled accuracy and successfully solve various problems associated with uneven illumination. It can be used to process the microscopy images captured from multi-well plates and detect experimental subjects from an unevenly illuminated background.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cell Image Analysis Techniques · Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques · Image Processing Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Aging phenomics enabled by quantitative imaging analysis10.18632/oncotarget.4566 ↗
2. 10.1038/nmeth.202410.1038/nmeth.2024 ↗
3. 10.1111/acel.1206310.1111/acel.12063 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmeth.162510.1038/nmeth.1625 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmeth.256010.1038/nmeth.2560 ↗
6. 10.1021/bp025617u10.1021/bp025617u ↗
7. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv19910.1093/bioinformatics/btv199 ↗
8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn34610.1093/bioinformatics/btn346 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.118309010.1126/science.1183090 ↗
10. 10.1073/pnas.150852411210.1073/pnas.1508524112 ↗
11. 10.1002/cyto.a.2112210.1002/cyto.a.21122 ↗
12. 10.1109/TSMC.1973.430931410.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314 ↗
13. 10.1109/TMI.2013.226509210.1109/TMI.2013.2265092 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.01.01710.1016/j.ymeth.2016.01.017 ↗
15. 10.1038/srep4116010.1038/srep41160 ↗
16. 10.1038/nmeth.192410.1038/nmeth.1924 ↗
17. 10.1504/IJRAM.2017.08256210.1504/IJRAM.2017.082562 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.addr.2013.12.00110.1016/j.addr.2013.12.001 ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01184.x10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01184.x ↗
20. 10.1038/nmeth.198410.1038/nmeth.1984 ↗
21. 10.1002/cyto.a.2262410.1002/cyto.a.22624 ↗
22. 10.1038/cr.2015.3610.1038/cr.2015.36 ↗
23. 10.1038/nprot.2014.09410.1038/nprot.2014.094 ↗
24. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq69110.1093/bioinformatics/btq691 ↗
25. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp57110.1093/bioinformatics/btp571 ↗
26. 10.1038/nature0886910.1038/nature08869 ↗
27. 10.1109/TSMC.1979.431007610.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗