Determination of the Number of Cells in Preimplantation Embryos by Using Noninvasive Optical Quadrature Microscopy in Conjunction with Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
The number of cells in a preimplantation embryo is directly correlated to the health and viability of the embryo. There are currently no methods to count the number of cells in late-stage preimplantation embryos noninvasively. We assessed the ability of optical quadrature microscopy (OQM) to count the number of cells in mouse preimplantation embryos noninvasively. First, to test for possible light toxicity, we exposed two-cell mouse embryos to OQM and differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy and assessed their ability to develop to the blastocyst stage. We found no inhibition of development from either mode of microscopy for up to 2 h of light exposure. We also imaged eight-cell to morula stage mouse preimplantation embryos by OQM nd developed two methods for counting the number of cells. The contour signature method (CSM) used OQM images alone and the phase subtraction method (PSM) used both OQM and DIC images. We compared both methods to standard cell counting techniques and found that the PSM was superior to all other noninvasive cell counting methods. Our work on mouse embryos should be applicable to human embryos. The ability to correctly count the number of cells in human preimplantation embryos could lead to the transfer of fewer embryos in in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinics and consequently a lower rate of high-risk multiple-infant births.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Reproductive Biology and Fertility · Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research · Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Townsend, D.J. , Quarles, K.D. , Thomas, A.L. , Rockward, W.S. , Warner, C.M. , Newmark, J.A. & Dimarzio, C.A. (2003).Quantitative phase measurements using a quadrature tomographicmicroscope.SPIE Proc 4964,59–65.10.1117/12.478343 ↗
2. Townsend, D.J. , Dimarzio, C.A. , Laevsky, G. & Rajadhyaksha, M. (2005).Multimodal optical microscope for imaging biological systems.SPIE Proc 5701,136–145.10.1117/12.591341 ↗
3. Kruger, T.F. & Stander, F.S. (1985).The effect of fluorescent light on the cleavage of two-cell mouseembryos.S Afr Med J 68,744–745.
4. Tao, J. , Tamis, R. , Fink, K. , Williams, B. , Nelson-White, T. & Craig, R. (2002).The neglected morula/compact stage embryo transfer.Hum Reprod 17,1513–1518.10.1093/humrep/17.6.1513 ↗
5. Gurgan, T. & Demirol, A. (2004).Why and how should multiple pregnancies be prevented in assistedreproduction treatment programmes? Reprod Biomed Online 9,237–244.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62136-0 ↗
6. Baczkowski, T. , Kurzawa, R. & Glabowski, W. (2004).Methods of embryo scoring in in vitro fertilization.Reprod Biol 4,5–22.
7. Eells, J.T. , Henry, M.M. , Summerfelt, P. , Wong-Riley, M.T. , Buchmann, E.V. , Kane, M. , Whelan, N.T. & Whelan, H.T. (2003).Therapeutic photobiomodulation for methanol-induced retinaltoxicity.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100,3439–3444.10.1073/pnas.0534746100 ↗
8. DiMarzio, C.A. , Corporon, J. , Warner, C.M. & Newmark, J.A. (2001).Advances in the development of a quadrature tomographicmicroscope. InOptical Society of America, Digest of the Spring 2001 TopicalMeeting on Biomedical Optics, pp.1–3.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention .(2002).Assisted reproductive technology success rates.Atlanta, GA:U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
10. Cozad, K.M. , Verbanac, K.M. , Goldbard, S.B. & Warner, C.M. (1981).An automated procedure to measure DNA synthesis in preimplantationmouse embryos.Gam Res 4,121–131.10.1002/mrd.1120040206 ↗
11. Nagy, N. , Gertsenstein, M. , Vintersten, K. & Behringer, R. (Eds.).(2003).Manipulating the mouse embryo.Cold Spring Harbor, NY:Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
12. Schumacher, A. & Fischer, B. (1988).Influence of visible light and room temperature on cellproliferation in preimplantation rabbit embryos.J Reprod Fertil 84,197–204.10.1530/jrf.0.0840197 ↗
13. Hegele-Hartung, C. , Schumacher, A. & Fischer, B. (1988).Ultrastructure of preimplantation rabbit embryos exposed to visiblelight and room temperature.Anat Embryol (Berl) 178,229–241.10.1007/BF00318226 ↗
14. Daniel, J.C. (1964).Cleavage of mammalian ova inhibited by visible light.Nature 201,316–317.10.1038/201316a0 ↗
15. Hirao, Y. & Yanagimachi, R. (1978).Detrimental effect of visible light on meiosis of mammalian eggs invitro.J Exp Zool 206,365–369.10.1002/jez.1402060308 ↗
16. Glina, Y. , Tsihrintzis, G.A. , Warner, C.M. , Hogenboom, D.O. & Dimarzio, C.A. (1999).On the use of the optical quadrature method in tomographicmicroscopy.SPIE Proc 3605,101–106.
17. Hogenboom, D.O. , Dimarzio, C.A. , Gaudette, T.J. , Devaney, A.J. & Lindberg, S.C. (1998).Three-dimensional images generated by quadratureinterferometry.Optics Lett 23,783–785.10.1364/OL.23.000783 ↗
18. Stott, J.J. , Bennett, R.E. , Warner, C.M. & Dimarzio, C.A. (2001).Three-dimensional imaging with a quadrature tomographicmicroscope.SPIE Proc 4261,24–32.
19. Tarkowski, A.K. (1966).An air drying method for chromosome preparations of mouseeggs.Cytogen 3,393–400.
20. Rijnders, P.M. & Jansen, C.A. (1998).The predictive value of day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocystformation, pregnancy and implantation rate after day 5 transfer followingin-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.Hum Reprod 13,2869–2873.10.1093/humrep/13.10.2869 ↗
21. Rienzi, L. , Ubaldi, F. , Iacobelli, M. , Romano, S. , Minasi, M.G. , Ferrero, S. , Sapienza, F. , Baroni, E. & Greco, E. (2005).Significance of morphological attributes of the early embryo.Reprod Biomed Online 10,669–681.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61676-8 ↗
22. Handyside, A.H. & Hunter, S. (1984).A rapid procedure for visualising the inner cell mass andtrophectoderm nuclei of mouse blastocysts in situ usingpolynucleotide-specific fluorochromes.J Exp Zool 231,429–434.10.1002/jez.1402310317 ↗
23. Barlow, P. , Puissant, F. , Van Der Zwalmen, P. , Vandromme, J. , Trigaux, P. & Leroy, F. (1992).In vitro fertilization, development, and implantation after exposureof mature mouse oocytes to visible light.Mol Reprod Dev 33,297–302.10.1002/mrd.1080330310 ↗
24. Warger, W.C., II , Newmark, J.A. , Chang, C. , Brooks, D.H. , Warner, C.M. & Dimarzio, C.A. (2005).Combining optical quadrature and differential interference contrastto facilitate embryonic cell counting with fluorescent imaging forconfirmation.SPIE Proc 5699,334–351.
25. Hegele-Hartung, C. , Schumacher, A. & Fischer, B. (1991).Effects of visible light and room temperature on the ultrastructureof preimplantation rabbit embryos: A time course study.Anat Embryol 183,559–571.10.1007/BF00187905 ↗
26. Squirrell, J.M. , Wokosin, D.L. , White, J.G. & Bavister, B.D. (1999).Long-term two-photon fluorescence imaging of mammalian embryoswithout compromising viability.Nat Biotechnol 17,763–767.10.1038/11698 ↗
27. Sauer, M.V. , Francis, M. , Macaso, T. & Paulson, R.J. (1991).The effect of chemiluminescent light exposure on the in vitrodevelopment of mouse embryos.J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 8,290–292.10.1007/BF01139787 ↗
28. Fischer, B. , Schumacher, A. , Hegele-Hartung, C. & Beier, H.M. (1988).Potential risk of light and room temperature exposure topreimplantation embryos.Fertil Steril 50,938–944.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)60377-1 ↗
29. Nakayama, T. , Noda, Y. , Goto, Y. & Mori, T. (1994).Effects of visible light and other environmental factors on theproduction of oxygen radicals by hamster embryos.Theriogen 41,499–510.10.1016/0093-691X(94)90086-X ↗
30. American Society for Reproductive Medicine .(2003).Multiple pregnancy and birth: Twins, triplets, and higher ordermultiples.Birmingham, AL:American Society for Reproductive Medicine.