journal article·2022-06Open access

Improving Quantitative EDS Chemical Analysis of Alloy Nanoparticles by PCA Denoising: Part II. Uncertainty Intervals

Murilo Moreira, Matthias Hillenkamp, Giorgio Divitini, Luiz H. G. Tizei, Caterina Ducati, Monica A. Cotta, Varlei Rodrigues, Daniel Ugarte

Microscopy and Microanalysis· Volume 28· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract Analytical studies of nanoparticles (NPs) are frequently based on huge datasets derived from hyperspectral images acquired using scanning transmission electron microscopy. These large datasets require machine learning computational tools to reduce dimensionality and extract relevant information. Principal component analysis (PCA) is a commonly used procedure to reconstruct information and generate a denoised dataset; however, several open questions remain regarding the accuracy and precision of reconstructions. Here, we use experiments and simulations to test the effect of PCA processing on data obtained from AuAg alloy NPs a few nanometers wide with different compositions. This study aims to address the reliability of chemical quantification after PCA processing. Our results show that the PCA treatment mitigates the contribution of Poisson noise and leads to better quantification, indicating that denoised results may be reliable from the point of view of both uncertainty and accuracy for properly planned experiments. However, the initial data need to be of sufficient quality: these results can only be obtained if the signal-to-noise ratio of input data exceeds a minimal value to avoid the occurrence of random noise bias in the PCA reconstructions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0409010.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04090 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-0-387-76501-310.1007/978-0-387-76501-3 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.11.00810.1016/j.ultramic.2018.11.008 ↗
4. 10.1017/S143192760606063610.1017/S1431927606060636 ↗
5. 10.1007/978-3-540-32646-510.1007/978-3-540-32646-5 ↗
6. 10.1017/S143192761500789810.1017/S1431927615007898 ↗
7. 10.1021/ac60259a00710.1021/ac60259a007 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.10.00110.1016/j.ultramic.2012.10.001 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.05.01810.1016/j.talanta.2014.05.018 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0968-4328(99)00020-710.1016/S0968-4328(99)00020-7 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41563-020-00833-z10.1038/s41563-020-00833-z ↗
12. 10.1198/jasa.2009.014710.1198/jasa.2009.0147 ↗
13. Hughes · 2010
14. 10.1093/jmicro/dfx12510.1093/jmicro/dfx125 ↗
15. 10.1016/0003-2670(94)00585-A10.1016/0003-2670(94)00585-A ↗
16. 10.1016/0304-3991(94)00175-M10.1016/0304-3991(94)00175-M ↗
17. 10.1016/0003-2670(94)00586-B10.1016/0003-2670(94)00586-B ↗
18. 10.1007/978-3-030-00069-110.1007/978-3-030-00069-1 ↗
19. 10.1017/S143192762000155510.1017/S1431927620001555 ↗
20. Bevington · 2003
21. 10.1017/S143192761200024410.1017/S1431927612000244 ↗
22. Malinowski · 2002
23. Jolliffe · 2002
24. Improving quantitative EDS chemical analysis of alloy nanoparticles by PCA denoising: Part I, reducing reconstruction bias
25. 10.1007/978-1-4471-4014-610.1007/978-1-4471-4014-6 ↗
26. 10.1002/sia.165710.1002/sia.1657 ↗
27. 10.1007/978-3-319-26651-010.1007/978-3-319-26651-0 ↗
28. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1975.tb03895.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.1975.tb03895.x ↗
29. 10.1162/neco.2007.19.10.275610.1162/neco.2007.19.10.2756 ↗
30. 10.1016/0165-1684(91)90079-X10.1016/0165-1684(91)90079-X ↗
31. 10.5281/zenodo.560874110.5281/zenodo.5608741 ↗
32. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/29/29570110.1088/0957-4484/21/29/295701 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00105-110.1016/S0003-2670(99)00105-1 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.10.02010.1016/j.ultramic.2015.10.020 ↗
35. Goldstein · 2017
36. 10.1007/978-1-4419-7200-210.1007/978-1-4419-7200-2 ↗
37. 10.1021/cr200134910.1021/cr2001349 ↗
38. 10.1007/978-3-642-01384-310.1007/978-3-642-01384-3 ↗
39. Binns · 2014
40. 10.1098/rsta.2015.020210.1098/rsta.2015.0202 ↗
41. Ferrando · 2016 · 2
42. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.06.02310.1016/j.ultramic.2017.06.023 ↗
43. 10.1186/s40679-019-0066-010.1186/s40679-019-0066-0 ↗
44. 10.1214/08-AOS61810.1214/08-AOS618 ↗
45. 10.1116/1.490084710.1116/1.4900847 ↗