journal article·2023-09-07Open access

Wave-like Robotic Locomotion between Highly Flexible Surfaces and Comparison to Worm Robot Locomotion

Dan Shachaf, Rotem Katz, David Zarrouk

Biomimetics· Volume 8· Issue 5

Abstract

In a recent study, we developed a minimally actuated robot that utilizes wave-like locomotion and analyzed its kinematics. In this paper, we present an analysis of the robot’s locomotion between two highly flexible surfaces. Initially, we created a simulation model of the robot between two surfaces and determined its speed and the conditions of locomotion based on the flexibility of the surface, the geometrical parameters, and the coefficient of friction for horizontal locomotion and climbing at different angles. Our findings indicate that wave locomotion is capable of consistently advancing along the surface, even when the surface is highly flexible. Next, we developed an experimental setup and conducted multiple experiments to validate the accuracy of our simulation. The results indicate an average relative difference of approximately 11% between the speed and advance ratio of the wave crawling between the two surfaces of our simulation model and the experimental results were performed using an actual robot. Lastly, we compared the wave locomotion results to those of the worm locomotion and discovered that wave locomotion outperforms worm locomotion, especially at a higher surface flexibility.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Robot Manipulation and Learning

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba 8410501, Israel

Funding

Helmsley Charitable Trust · Israel Science Foundation · Ministry of Science and Technology of Israel

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Frictional resistance characteristics of a capsule inside the intestine for microendoscope design10.1243/095441104323118914 ↗
2. Wang, X., and Meng, M.Q.-H. (2006, January 20–22). Study of frictional properties of the small intestine for design of active capsule endoscope. Proceedings of the 2006 1st IEEE RAS EMBS Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Pisa, Italy.
3. Research on measurement and modeling of the gastro intestine’s frictional characteristics10.1088/0957-0233/20/1/015803 ↗
4. Fung, Y.C. (1993). Biomechanics, Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, Springer.
5. Mechanics of locomotion of a double screw crawling robot10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.104010 ↗
6. Liang, H., Guan, Y., Xiao, Z., Hu, C., and Liu, Z. (2011, January 6–8). A screw propelling capsule robot. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation, Shenzhen, China.
7. Modeling and experimental validation of the locomotion of endoscopic robots in the colon10.1177/0278364904042204 ↗
8. Analysis and development of locomotion devices for the gastrointestinal tract10.1109/TBME.2002.1001976 ↗
9. Analysis of robotic locomotion devices for the gastrointestinal tract10.1007/3-540-36460-9_31 ↗
10. Menciassi, A., Gorini, S., Pernorio, G., and Dario, P. (May, January 26). A SMA actuated artificial earthworm. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, New Orleans, LA, USA.
11. Design and fabrication of a locomotive mechanism for capsule-type endoscopes using shape memory alloys (SMAs)10.1109/TMECH.2004.842222 ↗
12. Inchworm like colonoscopic robot with hollow body and steering device10.1299/jsmec.49.205 ↗
13. One pneumatic line based inchworm-like micro robot for half-inch pipe inspection10.1016/j.mechatronics.2008.05.007 ↗
14. Design and development of a new piezoelectric linear Inchworm Actuator10.1016/j.mechatronics.2005.02.002 ↗
15. A fully autonomous microrobotic endoscopy system10.1023/A:1008161411382 ↗
16. The Development of a Robotic Endoscope
17. An earthworm-like micro robot using shape memory alloy actuator10.1016/j.sna.2005.05.004 ↗
18. From wired to wireless: A miniature robot for intestinal inspection10.1080/03091900210156823 ↗
19. A wireless robotic endoscope for gastrointestine10.1109/TRO.2008.915418 ↗
20. An earthworm-like robotic endoscope system for human intestine: Design, analysis, and experiment10.1007/s10439-008-9597-6 ↗
21. Development of a peristaltic crawling robot using planar link mechanisms10.1002/tee.20236 ↗
22. Dietrich, J., Meier, P., Oberthur, S., Preub, R., Voges, D., and Zimmermann, K. (2004). Micro- and Nanostructures of Biological Systems, Shaker.
23. A self-propelled inflatable earthworm-like endoscope actuated by single supply line10.1109/TBME.2010.2040617 ↗
24. Analysis of worm-like robotic locomotion on compliant surfaces10.1109/TBME.2010.2066274 ↗
25. Conditions for worm-robot locomotion in a flexible environment: Theory and experiments10.1109/TBME.2011.2182612 ↗
26. Analysis and design of one degree of freedom worm robots for locomotion on rigid and compliant terrain10.1115/1.4005656 ↗
27. Kandhari, A., Mehringer, A., Chiel, H.J., Quinn, R.D., and Daltorio, K.A. (2019). Design and Actuation of a Fabric-Based Worm-Like Robot. Biomimetics, 4.10.3390/biomimetics4010013 ↗
28. Meshworm: A Peristaltic Soft Robot with Antagonistic Nickel Titanium Coil Actuators10.1109/TMECH.2012.2204070 ↗
29. Single actuator wave-like robot (SAW): Design, modeling, and experiments10.1088/1748-3190/11/4/046004 ↗
30. Analysis of the swimming of microscopic organisms
31. The action of waving cylindrical tails in propelling microscopic organisms
32. Biological inspirations, kinematics modeling, mechanism design and experiments on an undulating robotic fin inspired by Gymnarchus niloticus10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.08.013 ↗
33. Efficient worm-like locomotion: Slip and control of soft-bodied peristaltic robots10.1088/1748-3182/8/3/035003 ↗
34. Continuous wave peristaltic motion in a robot10.1177/0278364911432486 ↗
35. Understanding undulatory locomotion in fishes using an inertia-compensated flapping foil robotic device10.1088/1748-3182/8/4/046013 ↗
36. Hydrodynamics of an Undulating Fin for a Wave-Like Locomotion System Design10.1109/TMECH.2011.2107747 ↗
37. A Novel Pneumatic Soft Snake Robot Using Traveling-Wave Locomotion in Constrained Environments10.1109/LRA.2020.2969923 ↗
38. Design and Development of a Wheel-less Snake Robot with Active Stiffness Control for Adaptive Pedal Wave Locomotion10.1007/s42235-019-0048-x ↗
39. Energy-Based Design Optimization of a Miniature Wave-Like Robot Inside Curved Compliant Tubes10.1109/LRA.2022.3217688 ↗
40. Drory, L.H., and Zarrouk, D. (2019, January 20–24). Locomotion Dynamics of a Miniature Wave-Like Robot, Modeling and Experiments. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICRA.2019.8794015 ↗
41. RSAW, A Highly Reconfigurable Wave Robot: Analysis, Design, and Experiments10.1109/LRA.2019.2932583 ↗
42. Sun, H., Wu, Q., Wang, X., Yang, T., and Sun, N. (2023). A New Self-Reconfiguration Wave-like Crawling Robot: Design, Analysis, and Experiments. Machines, 11.10.3390/machines11030398 ↗
43. Construction and Excavation by Collaborative Double-Tailed SAW Robots10.1109/LRA.2022.3146562 ↗
44. A novel wave-like crawling robot has excellent swimming capabilities10.1088/1748-3190/acb1e8 ↗
45. Bidirectional electrohydrodynamic pump with high symmetrical performance and its application to a tube actuator10.1016/j.sna.2021.113168 ↗
46. Design of topology optimized compliant legs for bio-inspired quadruped robots10.1038/s41598-023-32106-5 ↗
47. A Resilient, Untethered Soft Robot10.1089/soro.2014.0008 ↗
48. Modeling Fabric-Type Actuator Using Point Clouds by Deep Learning10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3204652 ↗