The Use of Simulated Body Fluid (SBF) for Assessing Materials Bioactivity in the Context of Tissue Engineering: Review and Challenges
Source abstract
Abstract
Some special implantable materials are defined as “bioactive” if they can bond to living bone, forming a tight and chemically-stable interface. This property, which is inherent to some glass compositions, or can be induced by applying appropriate surface treatments on otherwise bio-inert metals, can be evaluated in vitro by immersion studies in simulated body fluid (SBF), mimicking the composition of human plasma. As a result, apatite coating may form on the material surface, and the presence of this bone-like “biomimetic skin” is considered predictive of bone-bonding ability in vivo. This review article summarizes the story and evolution of in vitro bioactivity testing methods using SBF, highlighting the influence of testing parameters (e.g., formulation and circulation of the solution) and material-related parameters (e.g., composition, geometry, texture). Suggestions for future methodological refinements are also provided at the end of the paper.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Materials Physics and Engineering, Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Life and Health Sciences, Chubu University, Aichi 487-8501, Japan
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Ratner, B.A., Hoffman, A.S., Schoen, F.J., and Lemons, J.E. (2004). A history of biomaterials. Biomaterials Science, Elsevier Academic Press. [2nd ed.].
2. Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials10.1002/jbm.820050611 ↗
3. Kokubo, T. (2008). In vitro evaluation of bone bioactivity. Bioceramics and their Clinical Applications, WoodHead Pub.10.1201/9781439832530.ch7 ↗
4. A comparative study of ultrastructures of the interfaces between four kinds of surface-active ceramic and bone10.1002/jbm.820261103 ↗
5. Compositional dependence of the formation of calcium phosphate films on bioglass10.1002/jbm.820140107 ↗
6. Apatite formation on the surface of ceravital-type glass-ceramic in the body10.1002/jbm.820251105 ↗
7. Bioactive glass ceramics: Properties and applications10.1016/0142-9612(91)90194-F ↗
8. Mechanism of apatite formation on CaO-SiO2-P2O5 glasses in a simulated body fluid10.1016/S0022-3093(05)80556-3 ↗
9. Apatite formation induced by Silica Gel in a simulated body fluid10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04470.x ↗
10. The role of hydrated silica, titania, and alumina in inducing apatite on implants10.1002/jbm.820280103 ↗
11. Bonelike apatite formation induced on zirconia gel in simulated body fluid10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00955.x ↗
12. Apatite-forming ability of niobium oxide gels in a simulated body fluid10.2109/jcersj.109.1275_929 ↗
13. Induction and acceleration of bonelike apatite formation on tantalum oxide gel in simulated body fluid10.1023/A:1011265701447 ↗
14. Preparation of bioactive Ti and its alloys via simple chemical surface treatment10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199611)32:3<409::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
15. Cross-sectional analysis of the surface ceramic layer developed on Ti metal by NaOH-heat treatment and soaking in SBF10.2109/jcersj2.117.1126 ↗
16. Bonding of chemically treated titanium implants to bone10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199711)37:2<267::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
17. Is the bone-bonding ability of a cementless total hip prosthesis enhanced by alkaline and heat treatments?10.1007/s11999-013-2945-3 ↗
18. Formation and growth of clusters in conventional and new kinds of simulated body fluids10.1002/jbm.a.10426 ↗
19. Preparation and assessment of revised simulated body fluids10.1002/jbm.a.10482 ↗
20. Round-robin test of SBDF for in vitro measurement of apatite-forming ability of synthetic materials10.3363/prb1992.17.0_119 ↗
21. (2007). ISO/FDIS 23317 Implants for surgery-in vitro evaluation for apatite-forming ability of implant materials. Int. Stand.
22. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
23. Can bioactivity be tested in vitro with SBF solution?10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.008 ↗
24. Apatite-formation ability-Predictor of “bioactivity”?10.1016/j.actbio.2010.05.013 ↗
25. Relationship between in vitro apatite-forming ability measured using simulated body fluid and in vivo bioactivity of materials10.1016/j.msec.2013.10.026 ↗
26. A review of acellular immersion tests on bioactive glasses-influence of medium on ion release and apatite formation10.1111/ijag.15006 ↗
27. Precipitation of carbonateapatite from a revised simulated body fluid in the presence of glucose
28. The influence of bovine serum albumin on the crystallization of calcium phosphates from a revised simulated body fluid10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00438-7 ↗
29. Crystallization from a milk-based revised simulated body fluid10.1088/1748-6041/2/2/005 ↗
30. Bioactivity evolution of the surface functionalized bioactive glasses10.1002/jbm.b.33203 ↗
31. A comparative study of simulated body fluids in the presence of proteins10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.006 ↗
32. Is non-buffered DMEM solution a suitable medium for in vitro bioactivity tests?10.1039/C4TB00187G ↗
33. Fluoride-containing bioactive glasses: Surface reactivity in simulated body fluids solutions10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.009 ↗
34. Calcium carbonate: Adored and ignored in bioactivity assessment10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.039 ↗
35. Multilayer corrosion films on bioglass surfaces10.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb11429.x ↗
36. Toxicology and biocompatibility of bioglasses10.1002/jbm.820150605 ↗
37. The story of Bioglass®10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z ↗
38. The Structure of silicate glasses and melts10.2113/gselements.2.5.269 ↗
39. Effect of sodium oxide modifier on structural and elastic properties of silicate glass10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b09664 ↗
40. An alternative view of the degradation of Bioglass10.1007/BF00539955 ↗
41. A neutron and X-Ray diffraction study of Bioglass® with reverse Monte Carlo modelling10.1002/adfm.200700433 ↗
42. Bioactive glass in tissue engineering10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016 ↗
43. Formation of a high-strength bioactive glass-ceramic in the system MgO-CaO-SiO2-P2O510.1007/BF01145520 ↗
44. Effect of crystallization on apatite layer formation of bioactive glass 45S510.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199604)30:4<509::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
45. Boron-containing bioactive glasses in bone and soft tissue engineering10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.11.001 ↗
46. Phosphate based glasses for biomedical applications10.1039/b307119g ↗
47. Response of human bone marrow stromal cells to a resorbable P2O5-SiO2-CaO-MgO-Na2O-K2O phosphate glass ceramic for tissue engineering applications10.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.017 ↗
48. Bioactive functional materials: A perspective on phosphate-based glasses10.1039/B810675D ↗
49. Mesoporous bioactive glasses: Relevance of their porous structure compared to that of classical bioglasses
50. Bioactive materials10.1016/0272-8842(95)00126-3 ↗
51. Recent bio-applications of sol-gel materials10.1039/B512706H ↗
52. Mesoporous bioactive glasses: Structure characteristics, drug/growth factor delivery and bone regeneration application10.1098/rsfs.2011.0121 ↗
53. Mesoporous bioactive glass as a multifunctional system for bone regeneration and controlled drug release
54. Bioactivity in ordered mesoporous materials10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2004.07.026 ↗
55. Tissue regeneration: A new property of mesoporous materials10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2005.04.003 ↗
56. Fiume, E., Migneco, C., Verné, E., and Baino, F. (2020). Comparison between bioactive sol-gel and melt-derived glasses/glass-ceramics based on the multicomponent SiO2-P2O5-CaO-MgO-Na2O-K2O System. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13030540 ↗
57. In vitro dissolution of melt-derived 45S5 and sol-gel derived 58S bioactive glasses10.1002/jbm.10207 ↗
58. A unified in vitro evaluation for apatite-forming ability of bioactive glasses and their variants10.1007/s10856-015-5403-9 ↗
59. Bioactive sol-gel glasses: Processing, properties, and applications10.1111/ijac.12873 ↗
60. Bioactive glass (type 45S5) nanoparticles: In vitro reactivity on nanoscale and biocompatibility10.1007/s11051-012-0966-6 ↗
61. Controlling the ion release from mixed alkali bioactive glasses by varying modifier ionic radii and molar volume10.1039/C5TB02426A ↗
62. Influence of strontium and the importance of glass chemistry and structure when designing bioactive glasses for bone regeneration10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.006 ↗
63. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: A systematic review10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x ↗
64. Impact of surface topography and coating on osteogenesis and bacterial attachment on titanium implants10.1177/2041731418790694 ↗
65. Corrosion behaviour of commercially pure titaniumshot blasted with different materials and sizes of shot particlesfor dental implant applications10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00314-9 ↗
66. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.017 ↗
67. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces10.1002/jbm.b.31264 ↗
68. Surface treatments and roughness properties of Ti-based biomaterials10.1023/B:JMSM.0000042679.28493.7f ↗
69. Relative contributions of chemistry and topography to the osseointegration of hydroxyapatite coatings10.1097/00003086-200212000-00004 ↗
70. Formation process of apatite layer on titanium-coated silicon wafer surfaces10.2109/jcersj2.16034 ↗
71. Effect of surface roughness of Ti, Zr, and TiZr on apatite precipitation from simulated body fluid10.1002/bit.21900 ↗
72. Effect of spatial design and thermal oxidation on apatite formation on Ti-15Zr-4Ta-4Nb alloy10.1016/j.actbio.2008.07.014 ↗
73. The status of porous materials to obtain direct skeletal attachment by tissue ingrowth
74. A high-modulus polymer for porous orthopedic implants: Biomechanical compatibility of porous implants10.1002/jbm.820120508 ↗
75. Preliminary evaluation of porous metal surfaced titanium for orthopedic implants10.1002/jbm.820040407 ↗
76. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
77. Selective laser melting-produced porous titanium scaffolds regenerate bone in critical size cortical bone defects
78. Porous titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium cage has better osseointegration and less micromotion than a poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in sheep vertebral fusion10.1111/aor.12153 ↗
79. In Vivo study of a self-stabilizing artificial vertebral body fabricated by electron beam melting10.1097/BRS.0000000000000211 ↗
80. Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo experiment10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069 ↗
81. Mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of porous bioactive titanium10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.019 ↗
82. Osteoinductive porous titanium implants: Effect of sodium removal by dilute HCl treatment10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.12.014 ↗
83. A critical review of multifunctional titanium surfaces: New frontiers for improving osseointegration and host response, avoiding bacteria contamination10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.013 ↗
84. Apatite-forming ability of alkali-treated Ti metal in body environment10.2109/jcersj.105.111 ↗
85. Novel bioactive titanate layers formed on Ti metal and its alloys by chemical treatments10.3390/ma3010048 ↗
86. Surface bioactivation through the nanostructured layer on titanium modified by facile HPT treatment10.1038/s41598-017-04395-0 ↗
87. Structural features of titanate nanotubes/nanobelts revealed by raman, X-ray absorption fine structure and electron diffraction characterizations10.1021/jp044282r ↗
88. Bioactive titanium oxide-based nanostructures prepared by one-step hydrothermal anodization10.1021/jp210783w ↗
89. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications10.1021/cr0500535 ↗
90. Oriented crystal growth model explains the formation of titania nanotubes10.1021/jp054320m ↗
91. Formation of titanium oxide nanotube10.1021/la9713816 ↗
92. Trititanate nanotubes made via a single alkali treatment10.1002/1521-4095(20020903)14:17<1208::AID-ADMA1208>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
93. Tuning the surface microstructure of titanate coating on titanium implant of enchacing bioactivity of implants10.2147/IJN.S75999 ↗
94. The effect of heat treatment on bone-bonding ability of alkali-treated titanium10.1016/S0142-9612(98)90203-4 ↗
95. Effect of heat treatment on apatite-forming ability of Ti metal induced by alkali treatment10.1023/A:1018524731409 ↗
96. Structural evolution from layered Na2Ti3O7 to Na2Ti6O13 nanowires enabling a highly reversible anode for Mg-ion batteries10.1039/C9NR08003A ↗
97. Surface potential change in bioactive titanium metal during the process of apatite formation in simulated body fluid10.1002/jbm.a.20039 ↗
98. An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of the process of apatite formation on bioactive titanium metal10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<185::AID-JBM1005>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
99. TEM-EDX study of mechanism of bonelike apatite formation on bioactive titanium metal in simulated body fluid10.1002/1097-4636(20011205)57:3<441::AID-JBM1187>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
100. Bioengineered titanium surfaces affect the gene-expression and phenotypic response of osteoprogenitor cells derived from mouse calvarial bones10.22203/eCM.v020a15 ↗