journal article·2026-06-24Open access

Bio-Inspired Sensitivity-Weighted NSGA-II Optimization of a 6-UPS Parallel Loading Mechanism for Aero-Engine Pylon Vector-Force Loading

You Zhang, Yang Pan, Lingyu Wang, Haoran Cui, Surong Jiang, Liping Ding, Shengli Chen, Yangshuo Yue, Bai Chen

Biomimetics· Volume 11· Issue 7

Abstract

Structural static testing is paramount for validating the structural integrity of critical aerospace components. However, conventional test rigs are often constrained to fixed loading axes and frequently induce parasitic torques. Accurate reproduction of aero-engine pylon flight loads therefore requires a mechanism that combines omnidirectional vector loading, high stiffness, and efficient force transmission. Achieving these coupled requirements is primarily a geometric synthesis problem, yet the associated workspace, stiffness, and load–capacity indices are nonlinear, mutually coupled, and expensive to evaluate over dense pose samples. To address this optimization bottleneck, this work develops a task-specific 6-UPS loading mechanism and a bio-inspired sensitivity-weighted NSGA-II algorithm for its geometric synthesis. Inspired by gene/locus-specific heterogeneity in biological evolution, the algorithm assigns variable-wise search intensities according to design-variable sensitivities, which are estimated using Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS). In this way, influential design genes receive stronger local exploitation, whereas less sensitive ones retain broader exploration. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the proposed approach reduces computation time from about 30 h to 3 h relative to direct optimization with the baseline NSGA-II, while simultaneously improving workspace, stiffness, and load-carrying capacity. A hybrid physical prototype was further tested under 240 loaded pose conditions; the system maintained force magnitude errors below 0.64% (63.42 N) and directional deviations below 1.15°. These results support the efficacy of the proposed bio-inspired optimization-based design methodology for high-fidelity static testing of aero-engine pylons under the adopted hybrid setup.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Cellular and Composite Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Science and Technology on Altitude Simulation Laboratory, Sichuan Gas Turbine Establishment, Aero Engine Corporation of China, Jiangyou 621700, China

Jiangsu Product Quality Testing and Inspection Institute, No. 5 Guanghua East St., Nanjing 210007, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Structural static test for validation of the structural integrity of an aircraft pylon10.1016/j.ast.2022.107402 ↗
2. Numerical analysis of drop impact-induced damage of a composite fuel tank assembly on a helicopter considering liquid sloshing10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111438 ↗
3. Structural Safety Evaluation of Test Fixture for Static Load Test of External Fuel Tank for Fixed-Wing Aircraft10.1007/s42405-021-00411-w ↗
4. Saki, L.J.H. (2023). Design of Aero Engine Mount Structure. [Bachelor’s Thesis, University West, Department of Engineering Science]. Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1782943/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
5. Static test rig development and application for an airliner’s hyperstatic aero-engine pylon structure
6. Wing structure static analysis using superelement10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.356 ↗
7. Rouse, M., and Jegley, D. (2015). Preparation for Testing a Multi-Bay Box Subjected to Combined Loads. Proceedings of the SEM 2015 Conference and Exposition, Springer. NASA Technical Report NF1676L-20919.
8. Multiaxial loading of aeronautic composite structures at intermediate scale: A review of VERTEX developments10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100439 ↗
9. Improving Structural Test and Analysis Correlation Using Digital Image Correlation Boundary Measurements10.2514/1.C037812 ↗
10. Multiaxis Loading Device for Reliability Tests of Machine Tools10.1109/TMECH.2018.2841883 ↗
11. Triaxial loading device for reliability tests of three-axis machine tools10.1016/j.rcim.2017.05.009 ↗
12. Multi-Axis Loading on Multiple Flanges of Intermediate Aero-Engine Case Based on Parallel Robotic Simulation10.1109/JRFID.2022.3214822 ↗
13. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
14. Comparative performance of the NSGA-II and MOPSO algorithms and simulations for evaluating time–cost–quality–risk trade-off in multi-modal PERT networks10.1007/s00500-023-09099-4 ↗
15. Optimal design of a planar parallel 3-DOF nanopositioner with multi-objective10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.02.005 ↗
16. Surrogate-assisted multi-objective evolutionary optimization with Pareto front model-based local search method10.1109/TCYB.2022.3186591 ↗
17. Data-driven modeling of the modal properties of a six-degrees-of-freedom industrial robot and its application to robotic milling10.1115/1.4045175 ↗
18. Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces10.1029/JB076i008p01905 ↗
19. Stiffness and mass optimization of parallel kinematic machine10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.09.014 ↗
20. Parameter sensitivity analysis of a 5-DoF parallel manipulator10.1016/j.rcim.2016.11.001 ↗
21. Variation in the mutation rate across mammalian genomes10.1038/nrg3098 ↗
22. Causes of evolutionary rate variation among protein sites10.1038/nrg.2015.18 ↗
23. Review of the performance optimization of parallel manipulators10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.104725 ↗
24. Kinematic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a 3-UPR parallel mechanism for a robotic leg10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.10.004 ↗
25. Analytical elastostatic stiffness modeling of parallel manipulators considering the compliance of the link and joint10.1016/j.apm.2019.10.024 ↗
26. Stiffness analysis of overconstrained parallel manipulators10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.05.017 ↗
27. Design optimization of a spatial six degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator based on artificial intelligence approaches10.1016/j.rcim.2009.07.002 ↗
28. Parameter optimization of heavy-load parallel manipulator by introducing stiffness distribution evaluation index10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.10.011 ↗
29. Dynamic analysis and driving force optimization of a 5-DOF parallel manipulator with redundant actuation10.1016/j.rcim.2017.02.006 ↗
30. Drive optimization of Tricept parallel mechanism with redundant actuation10.3901/JME.2010.05.008 ↗
31. Multiobjective optimization of 6-dof UPS parallel manipulators10.1080/01691864.2012.703168 ↗
32. Analysis of support vector regression for approximation of complex engineering analyses10.1115/1.1897403 ↗
33. Evaluation of mechanical properties of concretes containing coarse recycled concrete aggregates using multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), M5 model tree (M5Tree), and least squares support vector regression (LSSVR) models10.1007/s00521-018-3630-y ↗
34. Seismic Stability Assessment of Rock Slopes Using Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines10.1007/s40515-024-00374-x ↗
35. Self-adaptive genetic algorithms with simulated binary crossover10.1162/106365601750190406 ↗
36. A dynamic polynomial mutation for evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms10.1142/S0218213011000097 ↗
37. Modeling, design and experiment of a remote-center-of-motion parallel manipulator for needle insertion10.1016/j.rcim.2017.09.014 ↗
38. Mechanism design and parameter optimization of a new asymmetric translational parallel manipulator10.5194/ms-10-255-2019 ↗
39. Workspace of parallel manipulators with symmetric identical kinematic chains10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2005.09.007 ↗
40. Kinematic nonlinearity analysis in hexapod machine tools: Symmetry and regional accuracy of workspace10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2013.09.007 ↗