journal article·2024-02-14Open access

Lamellar Septa-like Structured Carbonate Apatite Scaffolds with Layer-by-Layer Fracture Behavior for Bone Regeneration

Ahmad Nazir Taleb Alashkar, Koichiro Hayashi, Kunio Ishikawa

Biomimetics· Volume 9· Issue 2

Abstract

Generally, ceramics are brittle, and porosity is inversely correlated with strength, which is one of the challenges of ceramic scaffolds. Here, we demonstrate that lamellar septum-like carbonate apatite scaffolds have the potential to overcome these challenges. They were fabricated by exploiting the cellular structure of the cuttlebone, removing the organic components from the cuttlebone, and performing hydrothermal treatment. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the scaffolds had a cellular structure with walls between lamellar septa. The interwall and interseptal sizes were 80–180 and 300–500 μm, respectively. The size of the region enclosed by the walls and septa coincided with the macropore size detected by mercury intrusion porosimetry. Although the scaffold porosity was extremely high (93.2%), the scaffold could be handled without disintegration. The compressive stress–strain curve demonstrated that the scaffolds showed layer-by-layer fracture behavior, which seemed beneficial for avoiding catastrophic failure under impact. When the scaffolds were implanted into rabbit femurs, new bone and blood vessels formed within the scaffold cells at 4 weeks. At 12 weeks, the scaffolds were almost entirely replaced with new bone. Thus, the lamellar septum-like cellular-structured carbonate apatite is a promising scaffold for achieving early bone regeneration and compression resistance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan

Funding

AMED · JSPS KAKENHI

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Autologous bone graft: Is it still the gold standard?10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.043 ↗
2. FDA-approved bone grafts and bone graft substitute devices in bone regeneration10.1016/j.msec.2021.112466 ↗
3. Govoni, M., Vivarelli, L., Mazzotta, A., Stagni, C., Maso, A., and Dallari, D. (2021). Commercial bone grafts claimed as an alternative to autografts: Current trends for clinical applications in orthopaedics. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14123290 ↗
4. What should be the characteristics of the ideal bone graft substitute? Combining scaffolds with growth factors and/or stem cells10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.014 ↗
5. Autogenous bone graft: Donor sites and techniques10.2106/JBJS.J.01513 ↗
6. Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries10.1186/s40824-019-0157-y ↗
7. Autologous Bone Grafting10.1016/j.otsm.2020.150780 ↗
8. Calcium phosphate cements: Optimization toward biodegradability10.1016/j.actbio.2020.10.013 ↗
9. Mishchenko, O., Yanovska, A., Kosinov, O., Maksymov, D., Moskalenko, R., Ramanavicius, A., and Pogorielov, M. (2023). Synthetic Calcium–Phosphate Materials for Bone Grafting. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15183822 ↗
10. A new multiphase calcium phosphate graft material improves bone healing—An in vitro and in vivo analysis10.1002/jbm.b.35121 ↗
11. Recent progress in preparation and applications of chitosan/calcium phosphate composite materials10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.143 ↗
12. Hou, X., Zhang, L., Zhou, Z., Luo, X., Wang, T., Zhao, X., Lu, B., Chen, F., and Zheng, L. (2022). Calcium Phosphate-Based Biomaterials for Bone Repair. J. Funct. Biomater., 13.10.3390/jfb13040187 ↗
13. Haba, Y., Köckerling, M., Schick, C., and Bader, R. (2019, January 27–29). Determination of Bone Density and Bone Composition Using Thermoaravimetric Analysis. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Measurement, Smolenice, Slovakia.10.23919/MEASUREMENT47340.2019.8780092 ↗
14. Body Composition, Bone Mass and Bone Geometry in Adolescent Athletes10.1249/01.mss.0000562540.84191.35 ↗
15. Calcium phosphates for biomedical applications10.1016/j.bsecv.2017.05.001 ↗
16. Tavoni, M., Dapporto, M., Tampieri, A., and Sprio, S. (2021). Bioactive Calcium Phosphate-Based Composites for Bone Regeneration. J. Compos. Sci., 5.10.3390/jcs5090227 ↗
17. Porous scaffolds for bone regeneration10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.007 ↗
18. A review of bioceramic porous scaffolds for hard tissue applications. Effects of structural features10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.192 ↗
19. The effect of porous structure on the cell proliferation, tissue ingrowth and angiogenic properties of poly(glycerol sebacate urethane) scaffolds10.1016/j.msec.2019.110384 ↗
20. Kanwar, S., and Vijayavenkataraman, S. (2021). Design of 3D printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: A review. Bioprinting, 24.10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00167 ↗
21. Impacts of channel direction on bone tissue engineering in 3D-printed carbonate apatite scaffolds10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109686 ↗
22. Property and biological effects of the cuttlebone derived calcium phosphate particles, a potential bioactive bone substitute material10.1002/jbm.b.35226 ↗
23. Mechanically Efficient Cellular Materials Inspired by Cuttlebone10.1002/adma.202007348 ↗
24. Mechanical design of the highly porous cuttlebone: A bioceramic hard buoyancy tank for cuttlefish10.1073/pnas.2009531117 ↗
25. Superiority of Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Gyroid Structure to Strut-Based Grid Structure in Both Strength and Bone Regeneration10.1021/acsami.3c06263 ↗
26. Hayashi, K., Yanagisawa, T., Shimabukuro, M., Kishida, R., and Ishikawa, K. (2022). Granular honeycomb scaffolds composed of carbonate apatite for simultaneous intra- and inter-granular osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Mater. Today Bio, 14.10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100247 ↗
27. Multiphase zinc and magnesium mono-substituted calcium phosphates derived from cuttlefish bone: A multifunctional biomaterials10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.11.295 ↗
28. Akpan, E.S., Dauda, M., Kuburi, L.S., Obada, D.O., Bansod, N.D., and Dodoo-Arhin, D. (2020). Mater Today Proceedings, Elsevier Ltd.
29. Bioactivity and mineralization of natural hydroxyapatite from cuttlefish bone and Bioglass® co-sintered bioceramics10.1002/term.2448 ↗
30. Hidroksiapatit dari cangkang sotong sebagai sediaan biomaterial perancah tulang
31. In vivo approach on femur bone regeneration of white rat (Rattus norvegicus) with the use of hydroxyapatite from cuttlefish bone (Sepia spp.) as bone filler10.14202/vetworld.2019.809-816 ↗
32. Scaffolds for bone restoration from cuttlefish10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.018 ↗
33. Biphasic ceramic bone graft with biphasic degradation rates10.1016/j.msec.2020.111421 ↗
34. Recent advances in natural polymer-based hydroxyapatite scaffolds: Properties and applications10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110360 ↗
35. Xie, Z., Yan, D., Zhou, Q., Wu, Z., Weng, S., Boodhun, V., Bai, B., Shen, Z., Tang, J., and Chen, L. (2019). The fast degradation of β-TCP ceramics facilitates healing of bone defects by the combination of BMP-2 and Teriparatide. Biomed. Pharmacother., 112.10.1016/j.biopha.2019.01.039 ↗
36. Synthesis and Dissolution Behavior of b-TCP and HA/b-TCP Composite Powders10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00263-7 ↗
37. Granular Honeycombs Composed of Carbonate Apatite, Hydroxyapatite, and β-Tricalcium Phosphate as Bone Graft Substitutes: Effects of Composition on Bone Formation and Maturation10.1021/acsabm.0c00060 ↗
38. Synthetic bone graft substitutes10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02128.x ↗
39. Calcium phosphate cements: Action of setting regulators on the properties of the p-tricalcium phosphate-monocalcium phosphate cements10.1016/0142-9612(89)90120-8 ↗
40. Formation and morphogenesis of a cuttlebone’s aragonite biomineral structures for the common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) on the nanoscale: Revisited10.1016/j.jcis.2017.08.028 ↗
41. Bone mineral: New insights into its chemical composition10.1038/s41598-019-44620-6 ↗
42. Calcium phosphate surface tailoring technologies for drug delivering and tissue engineering10.2174/978160805462611201010043 ↗
43. Berzina-Cimdina, L., and Borodajenko, N. (2012). Materials Science, Engineering and Technology, InTech.
44. Carbonate substitution in the mineral component of bone: Discriminating the structural changes, simultaneously imposed by carbonate in A and B sites of apatite10.1016/j.jssc.2017.07.025 ↗
45. Effects of nanopores on the mechanical strength, osteoclastogenesis, and osteogenesis in honeycomb scaffolds10.1039/D0TB01498B ↗
46. Gear-shaped carbonate apatite granules with a hexagonal macropore for rapid bone regeneration10.1016/j.csbj.2023.03.053 ↗
47. Effects of Scaffold Shape on Bone Regeneration: Tiny Shape Differences Affect the Entire System10.1021/acsnano.2c03776 ↗
48. Bone formation in rabbit cancellous bone defects filled with bioactive glass granules10.3109/17453679508995588 ↗
49. Comparative Bone Anatomy of Commonly Used Laboratory Animals: Implications for Drug Discovery
50. Cuttlefish bone scaffold for tissue engineering: A novel hydrothermal transformation, chemical-physical, and biological characterization
51. Kim, B.S., Kang, H.J., Yang, S.S., and Lee, J. (2014). Comparison of in vitro and in vivo bioactivity: Cuttlefish-bone-derived hydroxyapatite and synthetic hydroxyapatite granules as a bone graft substitute. Biomed. Mater., 9.10.1088/1748-6041/9/2/025004 ↗
52. Hayashi, K., Kishida, R., Tsuchiya, A., and Ishikawa, K. (2024). Transformable Carbonate Apatite Chains as a Novel Type of Bone Graft. Adv. Healthc. Mater., e2303245.10.1002/adhm.202303245 ↗
53. Faster Biomineralization and Tailored Mechanical Properties of Marine-Resource-Derived Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds with Tunable Interconnected Porous Architecture10.1021/acsabm.9b00151 ↗