journal article·2020-10-30Open access

Recent Developments in Biomimetic Antifouling Materials: A Review

Timothy Sullivan, Irene O’Callaghan

Biomimetics· Volume 5· Issue 4

Abstract

The term ‘biomimetic’ might be applied to any material or process that in some way reproduces, mimics, or is otherwise inspired by nature. Also variously termed bionic, bioinspired, biological design, or even green design, the idea of adapting or taking inspiration from a natural solution to solve a modern engineering problem has been of scientific interest since it was first proposed in the 1960s. Since then, the concept that natural materials and nature can provide inspiration for incredible breakthroughs and developments in terms of new technologies and entirely new approaches to solving technological problems has become widely accepted. This is very much evident in the fields of materials science, surface science, and coatings. In this review, we survey recent developments (primarily those within the last decade) in biomimetic approaches to antifouling, self-cleaning, or anti-biofilm technologies. We find that this field continues to mature, and emerging novel, biomimetic technologies are present at multiple stages in the development pipeline, with some becoming commercially available. However, we also note that the rate of commercialization of these technologies appears slow compared to the significant research output within the field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, T23 TK30 Cork, Ireland

Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, T23 XE10 Cork, Ireland

School of Chemistry, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland

References (91)

Show source-provided references
1. Designing biomimetic antifouling surfaces10.1098/rsta.2010.0195 ↗
2. Biomimetics—A review10.1243/09544119JEIM561 ↗
3. Mollusk Shell Formation: A Source of New Concepts for Understanding Biomineralization Processes10.1002/chem.200500980 ↗
4. Mora, C., Tittensor, D.P., Adl, S., Simpson, A.G.B., and Worm, B. (2011). How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean?. PLoS Biol., 9.10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127 ↗
5. Gordon, J.E. (1968). The New Science of Strong Materials: Or Why You Don’t Fall Through the Floor, Penguin UK.
6. Biomimetics: Lessons from nature–an overview10.1098/rsta.2009.0011 ↗
7. Bar-Cohen, Y. (2006). Biomimetics: Biologically Inspired Technologies, CRC/Taylor & Francis.10.1201/9781420037715 ↗
8. Biofouling and me: My Stockholm syndrome with biofilms10.1016/j.watres.2020.115576 ↗
9. Biofouling: Lessons from nature10.1098/rsta.2011.0502 ↗
10. Kim, W., Tengra, F.K., Young, Z., Shong, J., Marchand, N., Chan, H.K., Pangule, R.C., Parra, M., Dordick, J.S., and Plawsky, J.L. (2013). Spaceflight Promotes Biofilm Formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0062437 ↗
11. Advanced strategies for combating bacterial biofilms10.1002/jcp.28225 ↗
12. Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship10.1080/08927014.2010.542809 ↗
13. Effect of shipping traffic on biofouling invasion success at population and community levels10.1007/s10530-016-1258-3 ↗
14. Biofilms on Hospital Shower Hoses: Characterization and Implications for Nosocomial Infections10.1128/AEM.03529-15 ↗
15. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05321-1 ↗
16. Antifouling Paint Booster Biocides in the UK Coastal Environment and Potential Risks of Biological Effects10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00216-2 ↗
17. The environmental fate and effects of antifouling paint biocides10.1080/08927010903216564 ↗
18. Antifouling: Regulation of biocides in the UK before and after Brexit10.1016/j.marpol.2018.02.015 ↗
19. Can fouling in membranes be ever defeated?10.1016/j.coche.2020.03.006 ↗
20. Chemistry and application of emerging ecofriendly antifouling paints: A review10.1007/s11998-019-00294-3 ↗
21. Broad spectrum effects of secondary metabolites from the red alga delisea pulchra in antifouling assays10.1080/08927019509378279 ↗
22. New bicyclic brominated furanones as potent autoinducer-2 quorum-sensing inhibitors against bacterial biofilm formation10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.05.037 ↗
23. Ethanolic extract of red seaweed Gracilaria fisheri and furanone eradicate Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio parahaemolyticus biofilms and ameliorate the bacterial infection in shrimp10.1016/j.fsi.2019.01.058 ↗
24. Karnjana, K., Nobsathian, S., Soowannayan, C., Zhao, W., Tang, Y.-J., and Wongprasert, K. (2020). Purification and Evaluation of N-benzyl Cinnamamide from Red Seaweed Gracilaria fisheri as an Inhibitor of Vibrio harveyi AI-2 Quorum Sensing. Mar. Drugs, 18.10.3390/md18020080 ↗
25. The “Lotus Effect” Explained: Two Reasons Why Two Length Scales of Topography Are Important10.1021/la0532149 ↗
26. The Lotus Effect: Superhydrophobicity and Metastability10.1021/la036369u ↗
27. Mimicking the Lotus Effect: Influence of Double Roughness Structures and Slender Pillars10.1021/la048629t ↗
28. Pereira, J. (2017). Lotus. Effect Washing Machine. (20170259790A1), U.S. Patent, (17 December 2019, the Application Granted Date).
29. Biomimetic surface modifications of stainless steel targeting dairy fouling mitigation and bacterial adhesion10.1016/j.fbp.2018.10.012 ↗
30. The Salvinia Paradox: Superhydrophobic Surfaces with Hydrophilic Pins for Air Retention Under Water10.1002/adma.200904411 ↗
31. Plant Surfaces: Structures and Functions for Biomimetic Innovations10.1007/s40820-016-0125-1 ↗
32. Superhydrophobic Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotubes for Biomimetic Air Retention under Water (Salvinia Effect)10.1002/admi.201700273 ↗
33. One-step fabrication of Salvinia-inspired superhydrophobic surfaces with High adhesion10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124517 ↗
34. Bionics and green technology in maritime shipping: An assessment of the effect of Salvinia air-layer hull coatings for drag and fuel reduction10.1098/rsta.2018.0263 ↗
35. Self-Assembled Nanofibers for Strong Underwater Adhesion: The Trick of Barnacles10.1021/acsami.8b04752 ↗
36. Biochemistry of Barnacle Adhesion: An Updated Review10.3389/fmars.2019.00565 ↗
37. Marine invertebrates are a source of bioadhesives with biomimetic interest10.1016/j.msec.2019.110467 ↗
38. Green biolubricant infused slippery surfaces to combat marine biofouling10.1016/j.jcis.2020.02.049 ↗
39. Mussel-mimetic polymer underwater adhesives with l-Dopa functionality: Influencing adhesion properties and simplified operation procedures10.1007/s10853-020-04572-z ↗
40. Tree frog adhesion biomimetics: Opportunities for the development of new, smart adhesives that adhere under wet conditions10.1098/rsta.2019.0131 ↗
41. Bio-inspired antifouling approaches: The quest towards non-toxic and non-biocidal materials10.1016/j.copbio.2015.12.012 ↗
42. Thermoplastic, rubber-like marine antifouling coatings with micro-structures via mechanical embossing10.1080/08927014.2020.1734576 ↗
43. Kommeren, S., Guerin, A.J., Dale, M.L., Ferguson, J., Lyall, G., Reynolds, K.J., Clare, A.S., Bastiaansen, C.W.M., and Sullivan, T. (2019). Sullivan Antifouling and Fouling-Release Performance of Photo-Embossed Fluorogel Elastomers. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 7.10.3390/jmse7110419 ↗
44. Biomimetic characterisation of key surface parameters for the development of fouling resistant materials10.1080/08927010802538480 ↗
45. Design of surfaces for controlling hard and soft fouling10.1098/rsta.2018.0266 ↗
46. Synthesis of ultrahydrophobic and thermally stable inorganic–organic nanocomposites for self-cleaning foul release coatings10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.067 ↗
47. Biomimetic self-cleaning surfaces: Synthesis, mechanism and applications10.1098/rsif.2016.0300 ↗
48. Anti-adhesive effects of plant wax coverage on insect attachment10.1093/jxb/erx271 ↗
49. Marine antifoulants from bifurcaria bifurcata (phaeophyceae, cystoseiraceae) and other brown macroalgae10.1080/08927010109378478 ↗
50. Sánchez-Lozano, I., Hernández-Guerrero, C.J., Muñoz-Ochoa, M., and Hellio, C. (2019). Biomimetic Approaches for the Development of New Antifouling Solutions: Study of Incorporation of Macroalgae and Sponge Extracts for the Development of New Environmentally-Friendly Coatings. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20.10.3390/ijms20194863 ↗
51. “From the Nature for the Nature”: An Eco-Friendly Antifouling Coating Consisting of Poly(lactic acid)-Based Polyurethane and Natural Antifoulant10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06917 ↗
52. Bioinspired Aryldiazonium Carbohydrate Coatings: Reduced Adhesion of Foulants at Polymer and Stainless Steel Surfaces in a Marine Environment10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03443 ↗
53. Diatoms associated with two South African kelp species: Ecklonia maxima and Laminaria pallida10.2989/1814232X.2019.1592778 ↗
54. Sullivan, T. (2019). Cell Shape and Surface Colonisation in the Diatom Genus Cocconeis—An Opportunity to Explore Bio-Inspired Shape Packing?. Biomimetics, 4.10.3390/biomimetics4020029 ↗
55. Fouling-Release Properties of Dendritic Polyglycerols against Marine Diatoms10.1021/acsami.8b12017 ↗
56. Identification of proteins in the adhesive trails of the diatom Amphora coffeaeformis10.1098/rstb.2019.0196 ↗
57. Tissue sloughing in the sponge Halichondria panicea: A fouling organism prevents being fouled10.1007/BF00379109 ↗
58. Marine paints: The particular case of antifouling paints10.1016/j.porgcoat.2007.01.017 ↗
59. The effects of grooming on a copper ablative coating: A six year study10.1080/08927014.2017.1328596 ↗
60. Bio-inspired strategies for designing antifouling biomaterials10.1186/s40824-016-0064-4 ↗
61. Non-toxic, non-biocide-release antifouling coatings based on molecular structure design for marine applications10.1039/C5TB00232J ↗
62. Effects of surface texture and interrelated properties on marine biofouling: A systematic review10.1080/08927014.2019.1636036 ↗
63. Ren, X., Guo, M., Xue, L., Zeng, Q., Gao, X., Xin, Y., Xu, L., and Li, L. (2020). A Self-Cleaning Mucus-like and Hierarchical Ciliary Bionic Surface for Marine Antifouling. Adv. Eng. Mater., 1901198.10.1002/adem.201901198 ↗
64. Antifouling Effect on Biomimetic Metamaterial Surfaces10.2494/photopolymer.31.129 ↗
65. The Study of Bile Duct Stent Having Antifouling Properties Using Biomimetics Technique10.2494/photopolymer.32.373 ↗
66. Influence of surface topography attributes on settlement and adhesion of natural and synthetic species10.1039/C9SM00527G ↗
67. Marine diatom settlement on microtextured materials in static field trials10.1007/s10853-017-0821-3 ↗
68. Biomimetic polymeric superhydrophobic surfaces and nanostructures: From fabrication to applications10.1039/C7NR00096K ↗
69. Biomimicking micropatterned surfaces and their effect on marine biofouling10.1021/la502006s ↗
70. Characterization and anti-settlement aspects of surface micro-structures from Cancer pagurus10.1088/1748-3182/9/4/046003 ↗
71. Layer-by-Layer-Assembled antifouling films with surface microtopography inspired by Laminaria japonica10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145564 ↗
72. Combat biofouling with microscopic ridge-like surface morphology: A bioinspired study10.1098/rsif.2017.0823 ↗
73. Biomimetic Nanopillared Surfaces Inhibit Drug Resistant Filamentous Fungal Growth10.1021/acsabm.9b00290 ↗
74. Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow: A review10.1098/rsta.2010.0201 ↗
75. Bioinspired Photocatalytic Shark-Skin Surfaces with Antibacterial and Antifouling Activity via Nanoimprint Lithography10.1021/acsami.8b05066 ↗
76. Marine drag reduction of shark skin inspired riblet surfaces10.1016/j.bsbt.2017.02.001 ↗
77. Hydrodynamic properties of biomimetic shark skin: Effect of denticle size and swimming speed10.1088/1748-3190/aad418 ↗
78. The characterization, replication and testing of dermal denticles of Scyliorhinus canicula for physical mechanisms of biofouling prevention10.1088/1748-3182/6/4/046001 ↗
79. Inhibition of biofilm formation by rough shark skin-patterned surfaces10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110738 ↗
80. Microfabricated Biomimetic placoid Scale-Inspired surfaces for antifouling applications10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.030 ↗
81. Preparation, anti-biofouling and drag-reduction properties of a biomimetic shark skin surface10.1242/bio.016899 ↗
82. Sharkskin-mimetic desalination membranes with ultralow biofouling10.1039/C8TA06125D ↗
83. Bionic shark skin replica and zwitterionic polymer brushes functionalized PDMS membrane for anti-fouling and wound dressing applications10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125663 ↗
84. A new biomimetic antifouling method based on water jet for marine structures
85. Microtopography of the eye surface of the crab Carcinus maenas: An atomic force microscope study suggesting a possible antifouling potential10.1098/rsif.2013.0122 ↗
86. Biofilms in Infections of the Eye10.3390/pathogens4010111 ↗
87. Rapid Prototyped Biomimetic Antifouling Surfaces for Marine Applications10.1016/j.matpr.2016.01.085 ↗
88. Photoresponsive Sponge-Like Coating for On-Demand Liquid Release10.1002/adfm.201705942 ↗
89. Bioinspired Surfaces with Dynamic Topography for Active Control of Biofouling10.1002/adma.201203374 ↗
90. Bioinspiration—The solution for biofouling control?10.1088/1748-3182/4/1/015007 ↗
91. Biomimetic multifunctional surfaces inspired from animals10.1016/j.cis.2016.03.004 ↗