Numerical Simulation of the Transient Flow around the Combined Morphing Leading-Edge and Trailing-Edge Airfoil
Source abstract
Abstract
An integrated approach to active flow control is proposed by finding both the drooping leading edge and the morphing trailing edge for flow management. This strategy aims to manage flow separation control by utilizing the synergistic effects of both control mechanisms, which we call the combined morphing leading edge and trailing edge (CoMpLETE) technique. This design is inspired by a bionic porpoise nose and the flap movements of the cetacean species. The motion of this mechanism achieves a continuous, wave-like, variable airfoil camber. The dynamic motion of the airfoil’s upper and lower surface coordinates in response to unsteady conditions is achieved by combining the thickness-to-chord (t/c) distribution with the time-dependent camber line equation. A parameterization model was constructed to mimic the motion around the morphing airfoil at various deflection amplitudes at the stall angle of attack and morphing actuation start times. The mean properties and qualitative trends of the flow phenomena are captured by the transition SST (shear stress transport) model. The effectiveness of the dynamically morphing airfoil as a flow control approach is evaluated by obtaining flow field data, such as velocity streamlines, vorticity contours, and aerodynamic forces. Different cases are investigated for the CoMpLETE morphing airfoil, which evaluates the airfoil’s parameters, such as its morphing location, deflection amplitude, and morphing starting time. The morphing airfoil’s performance is analyzed to provide further insights into the dynamic lift and drag force variations at pre-defined deflection frequencies of 0.5 Hz, 1 Hz, and 2 Hz. The findings demonstrate that adjusting the airfoil camber reduces streamwise adverse pressure gradients, thus preventing significant flow separation. Although the trailing-edge deflection and its location along the chord influence the generation and separation of the leading-edge vortex (LEV), these results show that the combined effect of the morphing leading edge and trailing edge has the potential to mitigate flow separation. The morphing airfoil successfully contributes to the flow reattachment and significantly increases the maximum lift coefficient (cl,max)). This work also broadens its focus to investigate the aerodynamic effects of a dynamically morphing leading and trailing edge, which seamlessly transitions along the side edges. The aerodynamic performance analysis is investigated across varying morphing frequencies, amplitudes, and actuation times.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research Laboratory in Active Controls, Avionics and Aeroservoelasticity (LARCASE), Department of Systems Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame West, Montreal, QC H3C1K3, Canada
Funding
Canada Research Chairs
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Ellerbeck, S. (2022, December 09). The Aviation Sector Wants to Reach Net Zero by 2050. How Will It Do It? World Economic Forum. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/12/aviation-net-zero-emissions/.
2. Bashir, M., Longtin-Martel, S., Botez, R.M., and Wong, T. (2021). Aerodynamic Design Optimization of a Morphing Leading Edge and Trailing Edge Airfoil–Application on the UAS-S45. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11041664 ↗
3. Morphing wing, UAV and aircraft multidisciplinary studies at the Laboratory of Applied Research in Active Controls, Avionics and AeroServoElasticity LARCASE
4. Botez, R.M. (2022, January 3–7). Overview of Morphing Aircraft and Unmanned Aerial Systems Methodologies and Results–Application on the Cessna Citation X, CRJ-700, UAS-S4 and UAS-S45. Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum, San Diego, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2022-1038 ↗
5. Experimental validation of a new morphing trailing edge system using Price–Païdoussis wind tunnel tests10.1016/j.cja.2019.03.016 ↗
6. Félix Patrón, R.S., Berrou, Y., and Botez, R. (2014, January 16–20). Climb, cruise and descent 3D trajectory optimization algorithm for a flight management system. Proceedings of the AIAA/3AF Aircraft Noise and Emissions Reduction Symposium, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.2514/6.2014-3018 ↗
7. Hamy, A., Murrieta-Mendoza, A., and Botez, R. (April, January 12,). Flight trajectory optimization to reduce fuel burn and polluting emissions using a performance database and ant colony optimization algorithm. Conference: AEGATS ‘16 Advanced Aircraft Efficiency in a Global Air Transport System, Paris, France.
8. Analysis of UAS-S4 Éhecatl aerodynamic performance improvement using several configurations of a morphing wing technology10.1017/aer.2016.61 ↗
9. Lepage, A., Amosse, Y., Brazier, J.-P., Forte, M., Vermeersch, O., and Liauzun, C. (2019, January 10–13). Experimental investigation of the laminar–Turbulent transition and crossflow instability of an oscillating airfoil in low speed flow. Proceedings of the IFASD 2019, Savannah, GA, USA.
10. Three-dimensional unsteady flow computations around a conventional slat of high-lift devices10.2514/1.25660 ↗
11. Effect of flap and slat riggings on 2-D high-lift aerodynamics10.2514/1.19391 ↗
12. Effects of synthetic jets on large amplitude sinusoidal pitch motions10.2514/1.3919 ↗
13. A review on active and passive flow control techniques
14. Drag minimization using active and passive flow control techniques10.1016/j.ast.2011.03.003 ↗
15. Review of rotating wing dynamic stall: Experiments and flow control10.1016/j.paerosci.2023.100887 ↗
16. Study of morphing winglet concepts aimed at improving load control and the aeroelastic behavior of civil transport aircraft
17. AIRGREEN2-Clean Sky 2 Programme: Adaptive Wing Technology Maturation, Challenges and Perspectives
18. Morphing wing flaps for large civil aircraft: Evolution of a smart technology across the Clean Sky program10.1016/j.cja.2020.08.004 ↗
19. SARISTU: Adaptive Trailing Edge Device (ATED) design process review10.1016/j.cja.2020.08.036 ↗
20. Gabor, O.S. (2015). Validation of Morphing Wing Methodologies on an Unmanned Aerial System and a Wind Tunnel Technology Demonstrator. [Ph.D. Thesis, École de technologie supérieure ÉTS].
21. Carossa, G.M., Ricci, S., De Gaspari, A., Liauzun, C., Dumont, A., and Steinbuch, M. (2016). Smart Intelligent Aircraft Structures (SARISTU), Springer.
22. Design of a smart leading edge device for low speed wind tunnel tests in the European project SADE10.1108/17579861111183911 ↗
23. Control strategies for aircraft airframe noise reduction10.1016/j.cja.2013.02.001 ↗
24. Numerical research on the effect of variable droop leading-edge on oscillating NACA 0012 airfoil dynamic stall10.1016/j.ast.2017.11.030 ↗
25. Lee, B.-s., Ye, K., Joo, W., and Lee, D.-H. (2005, January 10–13). Passive control of dynamic stall via nose droop with Gurney flap. Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA.10.2514/6.2005-1364 ↗
26. Computational modeling of variable-droop leading edge in forward flight10.2514/1.39174 ↗
27. Turner, T.L., Moore, J., and Long, D.L. (2017, January 9–13). Computational Modeling of a Mechanized Bench-Top Apparatus for Leading-Edge Slat Noise Treatment Device Prototypes. Proceedings of the 25th AIAA/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, Grapevine, TX, USA.10.2514/6.2017-1874 ↗
28. Numerical Simulation of Continuous Morphing Wing with Leading Edge and Trailing Edge Parabolic Flaps10.1061/JAEEEZ.ASENG-4622 ↗
29. Optimization of variable-camber continuous trailing-edge flap configuration for drag reduction10.2514/1.C034810 ↗
30. Aerodynamic characteristics of morphing wing with flexible leading-edge10.1016/j.cja.2020.03.012 ↗
31. Trailing Edge Flap Effects on Dynamic Stall Vortex and Unsteady Aerodynamic Forces on a Pitching Airfoil10.1155/2022/1674074 ↗
32. Unsteady airfoil with dynamic leading-and trailing-edge flaps10.2514/1.42431 ↗
33. Abdessemed, C., Yao, Y., and Bouferrouk, A. (2021). Near Stall Unsteady Flow Responses to Morphing Flap Deflections. Fluids, 6.10.3390/fluids6050180 ↗
34. Abdessemed, C., Bouferrouk, A., and Yao, Y. (2021, January 11–12). Aerodynamic and aeroacoustic analysis of a harmonically morphing airfoil using dynamic meshing. Proceedings of the Acoustics, Online.10.3390/acoustics3010013 ↗
35. Abdessemed, C., Bouferrouk, A., and Yao, Y. (2022). Effects of an Unsteady Morphing Wing with Seamless Side-Edge Transition on Aerodynamic Performance. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15031093 ↗
36. Dynamic stall alleviation using a deformable leading edge concept-a numerical study10.2514/2.3060 ↗
37. Seifert, A., and Pack, L. (1999, January 11–14). Oscillatory excitation of unsteady compressible flows over airfoils at flight Reynolds numbers. Proceedings of the 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA.10.2514/6.1999-925 ↗
38. Dynamic stall control on flapping wing airfoils10.1016/j.ast.2016.12.008 ↗
39. Controlled leading-edge suction for management of unsteady separation over pitching airfoils10.2514/3.13398 ↗
40. Comparative study of two lay-up sequence dispositions for flexible skin design of morphing leading edge10.1016/j.cja.2020.03.035 ↗
41. Combustion-powered actuation for dynamic-stall suppression: High-mach simulations and low-mach experiments10.2514/1.J053641 ↗
42. Xu, H.-Y., Qiao, C.-L., and Ye, Z.-Y. (2016). Dynamic stall control on the wind turbine airfoil via a co-flow jet. Energies, 9.10.3390/en9060429 ↗
43. Effect of trailing-edge morphing on flow characteristics around a pitching airfoil10.2514/1.J061055 ↗
44. Seamless morphing trailing edge flaps for UAS-S45 using high-fidelity aerodynamic optimization10.1016/j.cja.2023.10.024 ↗
45. Negahban, M.H., Bashir, M., and Botez, R.M. (2023, January 23–27). Aerodynamic Optimization of a Novel Synthetic Trailing Edge and Chord Elongation Morphing: Application to the UAS-S45 Airfoil. Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum, National Harbor, MD, USA.10.2514/6.2023-1582 ↗
46. Combining passive control method for dynamic stall control10.2514/1.17957 ↗
47. Deep dynamic stall and active aerodynamic modification on a S833 airfoil using pitching trailing edge flap10.1177/0309524X20938858 ↗
48. Numerical investigation of dynamic stall reduction on helicopter blade section in forward flight by an airfoil deformation method10.1007/s40430-021-02822-y ↗
49. Flow separation control using the cetacean species nose design10.1016/j.euromechflu.2021.05.005 ↗
50. Pitching airfoil with combined Gurney flap and unsteady trailing-edge flap deflection10.2514/1.J051278 ↗
51. Combined droop nose and trailing-edges morphing effects on airfoils aerodynamics10.1007/s42452-019-0796-6 ↗
52. Yuan, W., Mamou, M., Khalid, M., Wokoeck, R., and Radespiel, R. (2006, January 5–8). LES/RANS simulations of airfoil flows near combined leading-edge trailing-edge stall. Proceedings of the 24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2006-3177 ↗
53. Bashir, M., Zonzini, N., Botez, R.M., Ceruti, A., and Wong, T. (2023). Flow control around the UAS-S45 pitching airfoil using a dynamically morphing leading edge (DMLE): A numerical study. Biomimetics, 8.10.3390/biomimetics8010051 ↗
54. Carr, L., and McAlister, K. (1983, January 17–19). The effect of a leading-edge slat on the dynamic stall of an oscillating airfoil. Proceedings of the Aircraft Design, Systems and Technology Meeting, Fort Worth, TX, USA.10.2514/6.1983-2533 ↗
55. Correa, A.F.M. (2015). The Study of Dynamic Stall and URANS Capabilities on Modelling Pitching Airfoil Flows. [Master’s Thesis, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia].
56. Mcallister, K., Carr, L., and Mccroskey, W. (2022, December 09). Dynamic Stall Experiments on the NACA 0012 Airfoil [NASA Technical Report No. NASA-TP-1100. January 1978], Available online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19780009057.