Transition Processes in Technological Systems: Inspiration from Processes in Biological Evolution
Source abstract
Abstract
With environmental challenges intensifying, a fundamental understanding and sustainable management of ongoing transition processes are crucial. Biological evolution provides valuable lessons on how to adapt and thrive under changing conditions. By studying its key principles, we identified analogies between biological evolution and technological transitions in terms of both the Multi-Level Perceptive and the path dependency model. The comparative study also revealed that, despite contrasting time scales, the generation-based and version-based developments are comparable. In addition, interesting similarities were found in the increase and decrease of variety and between fitness and consistency. The lessons learned from biology include “Give it a try”, “Do not close for reconstruction”, and “Keep older versions in the innovation process”. Based on this comparison, we aim to gain insights for a better understanding of how to manage technology transitions and to derive concrete indicators for assessing and monitoring them. In doing so, we can provide action-oriented guidance for developing more sustainable technological solutions for major ongoing transitions, such as the energy transition.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Global Energy and Sustainability Research · Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting · Environmental Impact and Sustainability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Cluster of Excellence livMatS @ FIT—Freiburg Center for Interactive Materials and Bioinspired Technologies, University of Freiburg, Georges-Köhler-Allee 105, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
Öko-Institut Consult GmbH, Merzhauser Str. 173, 79100 Freiburg, Germany
Plant Biomechanics Group @ Botanic Garden Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Schänzlestr. 1, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) · University of Freiburg (Germany)
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. The system building perspective for building sustainable system configurations using the German energy transition as an example10.1093/ooenergy/oiae010 ↗
2. European Environment Agency (2025, March 20). Europe’s Sustainability Transitions Outlook: Short-Term Action, Long-Term Thinking. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/europes-sustainability-transitions-outlook.
3. Luu, R.K., Arevalo, S., Lu, W., Ni, B., Yang, Z., Shen, S.C., Berkovich, J., Hsu, Y.C., Zan, S., and Buehler, M.J. (2024). Learning from nature to achieve material sustainability: Generative AI for rigorous bio-inspired materials design. MIT Explor. Gener. AI.10.21428/e4baedd9.33bd7449 ↗
4. Reactions of sciences to the Anthropocene: Highlighting inter- and transdisciplinary practices in biomimetics and sustainability research10.1525/elementa.2021.035 ↗
5. Brundtland Commission (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press.
6. United Nations (2025, March 24). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/48th-session/documents/2017-2-IAEG-SDGs-E.pdf.
7. Möller, M. (2022). Entwicklung eines mehrstufigen Methodenrahmens für eine prospektive Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung von neuartigen Technologien und Materialsystemen (TAPAS). [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Freiburg]. Available online: https://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/235292.
8. Sustainability assessments inspired by biological concepts10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102630 ↗
9. Speck, O., Möller, M., Grießhammer, R., and Speck, T. (2022). Biological concepts as a source of inspiration for efficiency, consistency, and sufficiency. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14148892 ↗
10. Lambers, H., Chapin, F.S., and Pons, T.L. (2008). Plant Physiological Ecology, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-78341-3 ↗
11. Fire and plant evolution10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04010.x ↗
12. Speck, O., and Speck, T. (2024). Is a forest fire a natural disaster? Investigating the fire tolerance of various tree species—An educational module. Biomimetics, 9.10.3390/biomimetics9020114 ↗
13. Hashem, H.A., and Mohamed, A.H. (2020). Strategies for drought tolerance in xerophytes. Plant Ecophysiology and Adaptation Under Climate Change: Mechanisms and Perspectives I: General Consequences and Plant Responses, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-2156-0_9 ↗
14. The new mutation theory of phenotypic evolution10.1073/pnas.0703349104 ↗
15. Genetic drift10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.007 ↗
16. Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Murray.10.5962/bhl.title.82303 ↗
17. Sadava, D., Hillis, D.M., Heller, H.C., and Hacker, S.D. (2019). Purves Biologie, Elsevier.10.1007/978-3-662-58172-8 ↗
18. Cross-kingdom comparison of the developmental hourglass10.1016/j.gde.2017.03.003 ↗
19. von Gleich, A., Pade, C., Petschow, U., and Pissarskoi, E. (2010). Trends in biomimetics. Potentials and Trends in Biomimetics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-05246-0 ↗
20. Natural hook-and-loop fasteners: Anatomy, mechanical properties, and attachment force of the jointed hooks of the Galium aparine fruit
21. Rechenberg, I. (1994). Evolutionsstrategie’94, Frommann-Holzboog.
22. Schwefel, H.P. (1993). Evolution and Optimum Seeking: The Sixth Generation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
23. (2012). Biomimetic Optimization–Application of Evolutionary Algorithms (Standard No. VDI:6224). Standard VDI 6224: Part 1.
24. Hollstein, R. (2023). Evolutionäre Algorithmen. Optimierungsmethoden: Einführung in die klassischen, naturanalogen und neuronalen Optimierungen, Springer.10.1007/978-3-658-39855-2 ↗
25. Speck, O., Speck, T., Baur, S., and Herdy, M. (2024). The basics of Evolution Strategies: The implementation of the biomimetic optimization method in educational modules. Biomimetics, 9.10.3390/biomimetics9070439 ↗
26. Arthur, W.B. (2009). The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves, Simon and Schuster.
27. Where Darwin does not fit…10.1016/S0262-4079(09)62217-X ↗
28. Barham, L. (2013). From Hand to Handle: The First Industrial Revolution, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199604715.001.0001 ↗
29. The evolutionary ecology of technological innovations10.1002/cplx.21436 ↗
30. Hortal, J., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., Low, M.E., Stigall, A.L., and Yeo, D.C. (2023). Alfred Russel Wallace’s legacy: An interdisciplinary conception of evolution in space and time. npj Biodivers, 2.10.1038/s44185-023-00010-w ↗
31. Huxley, J. (1942). Evolution. The Modern Synthesis, George Alien & Unwin Ltd.
32. Phenotypic evolution with and beyond genome evolution10.1016/bs.ctdb.2016.04.002 ↗
33. Horn, R., Gantner, J., Widmer, L., Sedlbauer, K.P., and Speck, O. (2016). Bio-inspired sustainability assessment–A conceptual framework. Biomimetic Research for Architecture and Building Construction: Biological Design and Integrative Structures, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-46374-2_18 ↗
34. Poppen, A. (2024, September 12). Evolution Ist Blind, aber Nicht Zufällig. Available online: https://www.uni-muenster.de/news/view.php?cmdid=13873.
35. Diversity of mechanical architectures in climbing plants: An evolutionary perspective10.1007/s00344-004-0044-0 ↗
36. Plant growth forms: An ecological and evolutionary perspective10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01309.x ↗
37. Succulent plant diversity as natural capital10.1002/ppp3.25 ↗
38. Dos Santos, P., Brilhante, M.Â., Messerschmid, T.F., Serrano, H.C., Kadereit, G., Branquinho, C., and De Vos, J.M. (2022). Plant growth forms dictate adaptations to the local climate. Front. Plant Sci., 13.10.3389/fpls.2022.1023595 ↗
39. Founder niche constrains evolutionary adaptive radiation10.1073/pnas.1310310110 ↗
40. Adaptive radiation of island plants: Evidence from Aeonium (Crassulaceae) Canary Isl10.1078/1433-8319-00013 ↗
41. Inter-and intra-island speciation and their morphological and ecological correlates in Aeonium (Crassulaceae), a species-rich Macaronesian radiation10.1093/aob/mcad033 ↗
42. Spencer, H. (1864). The Principles of Biology, Williams and Norgate.
43. Genetic variability maintained in a finite population due to mutational production of neutral and nearly neutral isoalleles10.1017/S0016672300011459 ↗
44. Medina, M., Baker, D.M., Baltrus, D.A., Bennett, G.M., Cardini, U., Correa, A.M., Degnan, S.M., Christa, G., Kim, E., and Li, J. (2022). Grand challenges in coevolution. Front. Ecol. Evol., 9.10.3389/fevo.2021.618251 ↗
45. Rechenberg, I. (1973). Optimierung Technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der Biologischen Evolution, Frommann-Holzboog Verlag.
46. Schwefel, H.P. (1977). Evolutionsstrategien für die numerische Optimierung. Numerische Optimierung von Computer-Modellen mittels der Evolutionsstrategie, Birkhäuser.10.1007/978-3-0348-5927-1 ↗
47. Mylo, M.D., and Speck, O. (2023). Longevity of system functions in biology and biomimetics: A matter of robustness and resilience. Biomimetics, 8.10.3390/biomimetics8020173 ↗
48. Herdy, M. (2000). Beiträge zur Theorie und Anwendung der Evolutionsstrategie, Mensch-und-Buch-Verlag.
49. Gerdes, I., Klawonn, F., and Kruse, R. (2004). Evolutionäre Algorithmen: Genetische Algorithmen–Strategien und Optimierungsverfahren–Beispielanwendungen, Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn.10.1007/978-3-322-86839-8 ↗
50. Synergistic optimization of renewable energy installations through evolution strategy10.1088/1748-9326/abfc75 ↗
51. Smil, V. (2024). Halfway Between Kyoto and 2050: Zero Carbon Is a Highly Unlikely Outcome, Fraser Institute. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep60358.6?seq=1.
52. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 ↗
53. Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014 ↗
54. Transition versus transformation: What is the difference?
55. Geels, F.W. (2005). Technological Transitions and System Innovations, Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781845424596 ↗
56. System interactions in socio-technical transitions: Extending the multi-level perspective10.1016/j.eist.2013.03.002 ↗
57. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 ↗
58. Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340 ↗
59. Bilali, H.E. (2019). The multi-level perspective in research on sustainability transitions in agriculture and food systems: A systematic review. Agriculture, 9.10.3390/agriculture9040074 ↗
60. Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts
61. Grießhammer, R., and Brohmann, B. (2015). Understanding the transformation. How Transformations and Social Innovations Can Succeed, Nomos.10.5771/9783845270852 ↗
62. Locked in transition? Towards a conceptualization of path-dependence lock-ins in the renewable energy landscape10.1016/j.erss.2023.103316 ↗
63. Old habits die hard: Path dependency and behavioral lock-in10.1080/00213624.2004.11506696 ↗
64. Korn, J. (2025, March 14). Pfad ist nicht gleich Pfad! Eine kritische Aufarbeitung der Pfadabhängigkeitstheorie als Grundlage und Appell der differenzierenden Betrachtung von Pfaden und Pfadzusammenhängen. Schriftenreihe: Sozialwissenschaftliche Zukunftsforschung. Available online: https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/fub188/28329/iF-Schriftenreihe_Korn_0120.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y.
65. Path dependence in energy systems and economic development10.1038/nenergy.2016.98 ↗
66. Organisatorische Pfade–Von der Pfadabhängigkeit zur Pfadkreation10.1007/978-3-322-91291-6_7 ↗
67. Carbon lock-in: Types, causes, and policy implications10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934 ↗
68. Escaping carbon lock-in10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00098-2 ↗
69. Wiatros-Motyka, M., Fulghum, N., and Jones, D. (2025, March 17). Global Electricity Review. Available online: https://ember-energy.org/app/uploads/2024/05/Report-Global-Electricity-Review-2024.pdf.
70. International Energy Agency (2025, March 17). China Forciert Erneuerbaren-Energie-Ausbau 2023. Statista Research Department. Available online: https://de.statista.com/infografik/30417/prognose-anteil-weltweiter-gesamtkapazitaet-und-zubau-erneuerbare-energien/.
71. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006 ↗
72. Experience from downscaling IPCC-SRES scenarios to specific national-level focus scenarios for ecosystem service management10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.014 ↗
73. (2024, September 23). Agora Energiewende. Die Energiewende in Deutschland: Stand der Dinge 2023, Available online: https://www.agora-energiewende.de/publikationen/die-energiewende-in-deutschland-stand-der-dinge-2023.
74. Gleaning insights from German energy transition and large-scale underground energy storage for China’s carbon neutrality10.1016/j.ijmst.2023.04.001 ↗
75. Wilsdorf, K. (2024, October 21). Bad Lauchstädt Energy Park Now in Implementation Phase. Available online: https://energiepark-bad-lauchstaedt.de/en/news-downloads/latest-news/bad-lauchstaedt-energy-park-now-in-implementation-phase/.
76. Enerdata (2025, March 19). Renewables Accounted for Nearly 60% of Germany’s Power Generation in 2024. Available online: https://www.enerdata.net/publications/daily-energy-news/renewables-accounted-nearly-60-germanys-power-generation-2024.html.
77. Liebreich, M. (2024, September 23). Net Zero Will Be Harder Than You Think—Furthermore, Easier. Part I: Harder. Available online: https://about.bnef.com/blog/liebreich-net-zero-will-be-harder-than-you-think-and-easier-part-i-harder/.
78. Some differences, many similarities: Comparing Europe’s responses to the 1973 oil crisis and the 2022 gas crisis10.1017/S1755773923000255 ↗
79. The influence of the Ukraine-Russia conflict on renewable and fossil energy price cycles10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107218 ↗
80. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, nukleare Sicherheit und Verbraucherschutz (2024, December 04). Developments in Germany Following the Nuclear Disaster in Japan. Available online: https://www.bmuv.de/en/topics/nuclear-safety/overview-nuclear-safety/response-to-fukushima/overview.
81. Prosumption and the distribution and supply of electricity10.1186/s13705-016-0087-7 ↗
82. Energy transition: Connotations, mechanisms and effects10.1016/j.esr.2024.101320 ↗
83. Review of impact categories and environmental indicators for life cycle assessment of geotechnical systems10.1111/jiec.12946 ↗
84. Life cycle assessment and circularity indicators10.1007/s11367-021-01966-2 ↗
85. Land use and sustainability indicators. An introduction10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.004 ↗
86. Arulnathan, V., Heidari, M.D., Doyon, M., Li, E.P.H., and Pelletier, N. (2022). Economic indicators for life cycle sustainability assessment: Going beyond life cycle costing. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15010013 ↗
87. Diaz-Chavez, R. (2014). Indicators for socio-economic sustainability assessment. Socio-Economic Impacts of Bioenergy Production, Springer. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-03829-2_2.10.1007/978-3-319-03829-2_2 ↗
88. A review of socioeconomic indicators of sustainability and wellbeing building on the social foundations framework10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107608 ↗
89. Economic indicators to assess the sustainability of conservation farming projects: An evaluation10.1016/0167-8809(96)01017-1 ↗
90. Social sustainability indicators: A comprehensive review with application in the energy sector10.1016/j.spc.2022.02.018 ↗
91. Social sustainability indicators as performance10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.03.008 ↗
92. Social sustainability: A review of indicators and empirical application10.5296/emsd.v4i2.8399 ↗
93. Wolff, F., Arne Heyen, D., Brohmann, D.B., and Grießhammer, D.R.G. (2018). Transformative Environmental Policy: Consistently Promote and Shape Sustainable Development, German Environment Agency. Available online: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/1410/publikationen/transformative_environmental_policy_web.pdf.
94. Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture10.1016/j.eiar.2009.06.002 ↗
95. Aszklar, H. (2024). The Window of Opportunity in Sustainability Transitions: An Empirical Investigation. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge].
96. The socio-technical dynamics of low-carbon transitions10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.018 ↗
97. Exploring indicators for monitoring sociotechnical system transitions through portfolio networks10.1093/scipol/scad015 ↗
98. Critical sustainability issues in the production of wind and solar electricity generation as well as storage facilities and possible solutions10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130720 ↗
99. Assessing the social and environmental impacts of critical mineral supply chains for the energy transition in Europe10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102841 ↗
100. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001 ↗