Bio-Inspired Strategies Are Adaptable to Sensors Manufactured on the Moon
Source abstract
Abstract
Bio-inspired strategies for robotic sensing are essential for in situ manufactured sensors on the Moon. Sensors are one crucial component of robots that should be manufactured from lunar resources to industrialize the Moon at low cost. We are concerned with two classes of sensor: (a) position sensors and derivatives thereof are the most elementary of measurements; and (b) light sensing arrays provide for distance measurement within the visible waveband. Terrestrial approaches to sensor design cannot be accommodated within the severe limitations imposed by the material resources and expected manufacturing competences on the Moon. Displacement and strain sensors may be constructed as potentiometers with aluminium extracted from anorthite. Anorthite is also a source of silica from which quartz may be manufactured. Thus, piezoelectric sensors may be constructed. Silicone plastic (siloxane) is an elastomer that may be derived from lunar volatiles. This offers the prospect for tactile sensing arrays. All components of photomultiplier tubes may be constructed from lunar resources. However, the spatial resolution of photomultiplier tubes is limited so only modest array sizes can be constructed. This requires us to exploit biomimetic strategies: (i) optical flow provides the visual navigation competences of insects implemented through modest circuitry, and (ii) foveated vision trades the visual resolution deficiencies with higher resolution of pan-tilt motors enabled by micro-stepping. Thus, basic sensors may be manufactured from lunar resources. They are elementary components of robotic machines that are crucial for constructing a sustainable lunar infrastructure. Constraints imposed by the Moon may be compensated for using biomimetic strategies which are adaptable to non-Earth environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cephalopods and Marine Biology · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Planetary Science and Exploration
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Self-Replication Research (CESER), Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Biomimetics—A review10.1243/09544119JEIM561 ↗
2. Biomimetics—A new approach to space systems design
3. Banken, E., and Oeffner, J. (2023). Biomimetics for innovative and future-oriented space applications—A review. Front. Space Technol., 3.10.3389/frspt.2022.1000788 ↗
4. Banken, E., Schneider, V., Pohhl, L., Kniep, J., Strobel, R., Ben-Larbi, M., Stoll, E., Pambaguian, L., Jahn, C., and Oeffner, J. (2021, January 20–23). Assessing bioinspired concepts for space debris removal and evaluating their feasibility for simple demonstrator design. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Space Debris, Darmstadt, Germany.
5. Khoshnevis, B., Bodiford, M.P., Burks, K.H., Ethridge, E., Tucker, D., Kim, W., Toutanji, H., and Fiske, M.R. (2005, January 10–13). Lunar contour crafting: A novel technique for ISRU-based habitat development. Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Paper AIAA 2005-538.10.2514/6.2005-538 ↗
6. Building components for an outpost on the lunar soil by means of a novel 3D printing technology10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.07.034 ↗
7. Dollar, A., Wagner, C., and Howe, R. (2006, January 20–22). Embedded sensors for biomimetic robotics via shape deposition manufacturing. Proceedings of the IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob 2006), Pisa, Italy.
8. Tebyani, M., Robbins, A., Asper, W., Kurniawan, S., Teodorescu, M., Wang, Z., and Hirai, S. (2020, January 22–26). 3D printing an assembled biomimetic robotic finger. Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR), Kyoto, Japan.10.1109/UR49135.2020.9144774 ↗
9. Biomimetic design and laser additive manufacturing—A perfect symbiosis?10.2351/1.5131642 ↗
10. Generating and storing power on the Moon using in situ resources10.1177/09544100211029433 ↗
11. Magnetic surveying with an unmanned ground vehicle10.1139/juvs-2018-0013 ↗
12. Ellery, A. (2022). Some key explorations in planetary rover autonomy for ISRU roles on the Moon. ASCE Earth & Space Conference 2022, Proceedings of the 18th Biennial International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction and Operatoions in Challenging Environments, Colorado School of Mines, Denver, CO, USA, 25–28 April 2022, American Society of Civil Engineers.10.1061/9780784484470.019 ↗
13. Thibodeau, B., Walls, X., Ellery, A., Cousens, B., and Marczenko, K. (2024). Extraction of silica and alumina from lunar highland simulant. ASCE Earth & Space Conference 2024, Proceedings of the 19th Biennial International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction and Operatoions in Challenging Environments, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA, 15–18 April 2024, American Society of Civil Engineers. Paper 6962.
14. Metalysis FFC process as a strategic lunar in situ resource utilisation technology10.1089/space.2021.0047 ↗
15. Walls, X., Ellery, A., Marczenko, K., and Wanjara, P. (2024). Aluminium metal extraction from lunar highland simulant using electrochemistry. ASCE Earth & Space Conference 2024, Proceedings of the 19th Biennial International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction and Operatoions in Challenging Environments, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA, 15–18 April 2024, American Society of Civil Engineers. Paper 7061.
16. Elaskri, A., and Ellery, A. (2020, January 19–23). 3D printed electric motors as a step towards self-replicating machines. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (iSAIRAS 2020), Virtual. Paper No 5020.
17. Leveraging in situ resources for lunar base construction10.1139/cjce-2021-0098 ↗
18. Ellery, A. (2021). Supplementing closed ecological life support systems with in situ resources on the Moon. Life, 11.10.3390/life11080770 ↗
19. Engineering a lunar photolithoautotroph to thrive on the Moon—Life or simulacrum?10.1017/S1473550417000532 ↗
20. Ellery, A. (2020). How to build a biological machine using engineering materials and methods. Biomim. J., 5.10.3390/biomimetics5030035 ↗
21. Biomimetics: Its practice and theory10.1098/rsif.2006.0127 ↗
22. Sustainable in situ resource utilisation on the Moon10.1016/j.pss.2020.104870 ↗
23. Ellery, A. (2022). Is electronics fabrication feasible on the Moon?. ASCE Earth & Space Conference 2022, Proceedings of the 18th Biennial International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction and Operatoions in Challenging Environments, Colorado School of Mines, Denver, CO, USA, 25–28 April 2022, American Society of Civil Engineers.10.1061/9780784484470.065 ↗
24. Artificial skin and tactile sensing for socially interactive robots: A review10.1016/j.robot.2014.09.008 ↗
25. Pak, V., Kirov, S., Nalivaiko, A., Ozherelkov, D., and Gromov, A. (2019). Obtaining alumina from kaolin clay via aluminium chloride. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12233938 ↗
26. Review on 3D printed sensors10.1088/1757-899X/764/1/012055 ↗
27. Barmpakos, D., and Kaltsas, G. (2021). Review on humidity, temperature and strain printed sensors—Current trends and future perspectives. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21030739 ↗
28. Ellery, A. (2024). Trials and tribulations of asteroid mining. ASCE Earth & Space Conference 2024, Proceedings of the 19th Biennial International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction and Operatoions in Challenging Environments, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA, 15–18 April 2024, American Society of Civil Engineers. Paper 8087.
29. World of touch10.4249/scholarpedia.32688 ↗
30. Biological information processing: Bits of progress10.1126/science.277.5329.1060 ↗
31. Novel strain sensor based on the campaniform sensillum of insects10.1098/rsta.2001.0929 ↗
32. Roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00234-8 ↗
33. Recent advances in biomimetic sensing technologies10.1098/rsta.2009.0005 ↗
34. Shape of wind-receptor hairs of cricket and cockroach10.1007/s003590050245 ↗
35. Luo, Y., and Hartmann, M. (2023). On the intrinsic curvature of animal whiskers. PLoS ONE, 18.10.1371/journal.pone.0269210 ↗
36. Najafi, K. (2012, January 28–31). Biomimetic hair sensors: Utilizing the third dimension. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE SENSORS, Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/ICSENS.2012.6411596 ↗
37. Biomimetic tactile sensors and signal processing with spike trains: A review10.1016/j.sna.2017.09.035 ↗
38. Asadnia, M., Kottapalli, P., Karavitaki, D., Warkiani, E., Miao, J., Corey, D., and Triantafyllou, M. (2016). From biological cilia to artificial flow sensors: Biomimetic soft polymer nanosensors with high sensing performance. Sci. Rep., 6.10.1038/srep32955 ↗
39. Sensing in nature: Using biomimetics for design of sensors10.1108/02602280810902604 ↗
40. Clements, T., and Rahn, C. (2005, January 2–6). Three-dimensional contact imaging with an actuated whisker. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems, Edmonton, AB, Canada.10.1109/IROS.2005.1545213 ↗
41. Engineering applications of small brains
42. Wicaksono, D., Chen, Y., and French, P. (2007, January 17–19). Design and modeling of a bio-inspired MEMS gyroscope. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Engineering & Informatics, Bandung, Indonesia.
43. Ultra-sensitive and resilient compliant strain gauges for soft machines10.1038/s41586-020-2892-6 ↗
44. Piezoresistive effect in SiOC ceramics for integrated pressure sensors10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03496.x ↗
45. Influence of carbon black concentration on piezoresistivity for carbon-black filled silicone rubber composite10.1016/j.carbon.2009.06.050 ↗
46. Embedded 3D printing of strain sensors within highly stretchable elastomers10.1002/adma.201400334 ↗
47. Design and fabrication of soft artificial skin using embedded microchannels and liquid conductors10.1109/JSEN.2012.2200790 ↗
48. Review on electrorheological fluids
49. Review of piezoelectric polymers as functional materials for electromechanical transducers10.1088/0964-1726/23/3/033001 ↗
50. Towards tactile sensing system on chip for robotic applications10.1109/JSEN.2011.2159835 ↗
51. Large area, flexible pressure sensor matrix with organic field effect transistors for artificial skin applications10.1073/pnas.0401918101 ↗
52. Current status and opportunities of organic thin-film transistor technologies10.1109/TED.2017.2677086 ↗
53. Flexible piezotronic strain sensor10.1021/nl802367t ↗
54. Real time robotic tactile sensor system for the determination of the physical properties of biomaterials10.1016/j.sna.2004.01.038 ↗
55. Kosorotov, V., Blonsky, I., Schedrina, L., and Levash, L. (2002, January 22–24). Quartz as artificial pyroactive material. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Materials & Material Properties for Infrared Optoelectronics, Kiev, Ukraine.10.1117/12.502179 ↗
56. Active touch sensing10.1098/rstb.2011.0167 ↗
57. Nose that looks like a hand and acts like an eye: The unusual mechanosensory system of the star-nosed mole10.1007/s003590050396 ↗
58. Towards the creation of tactile maps for robots and their use in robot contact motion control10.1016/j.robot.2014.09.011 ↗
59. Biomimetic artificial skin for robots: A review10.54905/disssi/v20i53/e3ije1003 ↗
60. Replicating how plants move10.1088/2058-7058/34/07/36 ↗
61. Ordinary camera, extraordinary places
62. Frederickson, S., Abbott, L., Duran, S., Jochim, D., Studak, B., Wagenknecht, J., and Williams, N. (2003, January 21–25). Mini AERCam: Development of a freeflying nanosatellite inspection robot. Proceedings of the Space Systems Technology & Operations, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1117/12.498108 ↗
63. Context for the ExoMars rover: The panoramic camera (pancam) instrument10.1017/S1473550406003387 ↗
64. Harnessing the properties of colloidal quantum dots in luminescent solar concentrators10.1039/C7CS00701A ↗
65. Colloidal quantum dots for solar technologies10.1016/j.chempr.2017.07.007 ↗
66. Structure/property relations in giant semiconductor nanocrystals: Opportunities in photonics and electronics10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00467 ↗
67. Inspirations from biological optics for advanced photonic systems10.1126/science.1115248 ↗
68. Remisova, K., and Hudec, R. (2016, January 18–21). Application of biomimetic principles in space optics. Proceedings of the SPIE International Conference Space Optics (ICSO 2016), Bellingham, WA, USA.10.1117/12.2296088 ↗
69. On the history of photomultiplier tube invention10.1016/j.nima.2006.05.221 ↗
70. Ta, X., Chan, W., and van der Graaf, H. (2016). Secondary electron emission materials for transmission dynodes in novel photomultipliers: A review. Materials, 9.10.3390/ma9121017 ↗
71. Optimisation of transmission mode metallic (aluminium) photocathodes10.1016/j.phpro.2012.03.726 ↗
72. Local doping of silicon by a point-contact microwave applicator10.1016/j.mee.2011.04.022 ↗
73. Optical energy gap of amorphous selenium: Effect of annealing10.1088/0022-3727/18/9/001 ↗
74. Woollam, J., Morash, K., Kuminsky, M., and Averbach, B. (1971). Photoconductive and Optical Properties of Amorphous Selenium.
75. Selenium and tellurium content of stony meteorites by neutron bombardment10.1016/0016-7037(60)90044-2 ↗
76. Jotter, R., and Ott, U. (2011, January 8–12). Selenium isotopes in some chondrites. Proceedings of the 74th Annual Meeting of the Meteoritical Society 2011, London, UK. Abstract No. 5016.
77. Kinetics of pyrite formation by the H2S oxidation of iron (II) monosulfide in aqueous solutions between 25 and 125 °C: The rate equation10.1016/S0016-7037(96)00321-3 ↗
78. Evolution of the first metabolic cycles10.1073/pnas.87.1.200 ↗
79. Thin photoactive FeS2 (pyrite) films10.1016/0025-5408(86)90088-7 ↗
80. Eye movement statistics in humans are consistent with an optimal search strategy10.1167/8.3.4 ↗
81. Developmental algorithm for ocular-motor coordination10.1016/j.robot.2009.08.002 ↗
82. Closed loop learning of visual control policies10.1613/jair.2110 ↗
83. Mechanisms and streams for processing of. what. and. where. in auditory cortex10.1073/pnas.97.22.11800 ↗
84. Brainstem origins for cortical. what. and. where. pathways in the auditory cortex10.1016/j.tins.2005.02.003 ↗
85. Vision chip with complementary pathways for open-world sensing10.1038/s41586-024-07358-4 ↗
86. Anthropomorphic retina-like structure for scene analysis10.1016/0146-664X(80)90026-X ↗
87. Animate vision10.1016/0004-3702(91)90080-4 ↗
88. Friston, K., Adams, R., Perrinet, L., and Breakspear, M. (2012). Perceptions as hypotheses: Saccades as experiments. Front. Psychol., 3.10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00151 ↗
89. How the brain keeps the eyes open10.1073/pnas.93.23.13339 ↗
90. Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements10.1038/377059a0 ↗
91. Autonomous exploration: Driven by uncertainty10.1109/34.584097 ↗
92. Two-dimensional neural network model of the primate saccadic system10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80162-5 ↗
93. Dynamic feedback to the superior colliculus in a neural network model of the gaze control system10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80084-X ↗
94. On building a bridge between brain and behavior10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141907 ↗
95. Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting and the acquiring of knowledge10.1146/annurev.ps.39.020188.000245 ↗
96. Situations, interaction, process and affordances: An ecological psychology perspective10.1023/A:1013537432164 ↗
97. Synaptic gradients transform object location to action10.1038/s41586-022-05562-8 ↗
98. Kalman filter-based method for pose estimation in visual servoing10.1109/TRO.2010.2061290 ↗
99. Biomimetic gaze stabilization based on feedback error learning with nonparametric regression networks10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00084-8 ↗
100. Panoramic camera tracking on planetary rovers using feedforward control10.1177/1729881417705921 ↗