journal article·2023-12-14Open access

Examining the Impact of Digital Human Gaze Expressions on Engagement Induction

Subin Mok, Sung Park, Mincheol Whang

Biomimetics· Volume 8· Issue 8

Abstract

With advancements in technology, digital humans are becoming increasingly sophisticated, with their application scope widening to include interactions with real people. However, research on expressions that facilitate natural engagement in interactions between real people and digital humans is scarce. With this study, we aimed to examine the differences in user engagement as measured by subjective evaluations, eye tracking, and electroencephalogram (EEG) responses relative to different gaze expressions in various conversational contexts. Conversational situations were categorized as face-to-face, face-to-video, and digital human interactions, with gaze expressions segmented into eye contact and gaze avoidance. Story stimuli incorporating twelve sentences verified to elicit positive and negative emotional responses were employed in the experiments after validation. A total of 45 participants (31 females and 14 males) underwent stimulation through positive and negative stories while exhibiting eye contact or gaze avoidance under each of the three conversational conditions. Engagement was assessed using subjective evaluation metrics in conjunction with measures of the subjects’ gaze and brainwave activity. The findings revealed engagement disparities between the face-to-face and digital-human conversation conditions. Notably, only positive stimuli elicited variations in engagement based on gaze expression across different conversation conditions. Gaze analysis corroborated the engagement differences, aligning with prior research on social sensitivity, but only in response to positive stimuli. This research departs from traditional studies of un-natural interactions with digital humans, focusing instead on interactions with digital humans designed to mimic the appearance of real humans. This study demonstrates the potential for gaze expression to induce engagement, regardless of the human or digital nature of the conversational dyads.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Action Observation and Synchronization · Digital Communication and Language

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Emotion Engineering, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Republic of Korea

Department of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Republic of Korea

Funding

an Institute for Information & communications Technology Promotion (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) · Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Using human physiology to evaluate subtle expressivity of a virtual quizmaster in a mathematical game10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.11.009 ↗
2. The effect of realistic appearance of virtual characters in immersive environments-does the character’s personality play a role?10.1109/TVCG.2018.2794638 ↗
3. Interactive clinical avatar use in pharmacist preregistration training: Design and review10.2196/17146 ↗
4. Optimising AVATAR therapy for people who hear distressing voices: Study protocol for the AVATAR2 multi-centre randomised controlled trial10.1186/s13063-021-05301-w ↗
5. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in high school using avatars in virtual worlds: An international feasibility study10.2196/jmir.1715 ↗
6. Self-regulated learning in learning environments with pedagogical agents that interact in natural language10.1080/00461520.2010.515933 ↗
7. My science tutor: A conversational multimedia virtual tutor10.1037/a0031589 ↗
8. Experimenting with dialogue on Twitter: An examination of the influence of the dialogic principles on engagement, interaction, and attitude10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.002 ↗
9. Johnston, K.A., and Taylor, M. (2018). The Handbook of Communication Engagement, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119167600 ↗
10. Perception of own and robot engagement in human–robot interactions and their dependence on robotics knowledge10.1016/j.robot.2013.09.012 ↗
11. Kompatsiari, K., Ciardo, F., De Tommaso, D., and Wykowska, A. (2019, January 3–8). Measuring engagement elicited by eye contact in Human-Robot Interaction. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Macau, China.10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8967747 ↗
12. Digital chameleons: Automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01619.x ↗
13. A test of spatial contiguity for virtual human’s gestures in multimedia learning environments10.1177/0735633115585927 ↗
14. Yee, N., Bailenson, J.N., and Rickertsen, K. A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
15. The embodiment of sexualized virtual selves: The Proteus effect and experiences of self-objectification via avatars10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.027 ↗
16. Task engagement, learner motivation and avatar identities of struggling English language learners in the 3D virtual world10.1016/j.system.2019.102168 ↗
17. Social engagement and user immersion in a socially based virtual world10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.008 ↗
18. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire10.1162/105474698565686 ↗
19. Immersion in computer games: The role of spatial presence and flow10.1155/2011/282345 ↗
20. Engagement in human-agent interaction: An overview10.3389/frobt.2020.00092 ↗
21. Sidner, C.L., Lee, C., and Lesh, N. (2003). Diabruck: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on the Semantic and Pragmatics of Dialogue, University of Saarland.
22. Measuring narrative engagement10.1080/15213260903287259 ↗
23. Empathy and related responses in children
24. Validation and evaluation of the empathy test10.1080/00221309.1954.9710125 ↗
25. Colman, A.M. (2015). A Dictionary of Psychology, Oxford University Press.
26. Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal distress10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0007 ↗
27. O’Brien, H. (2016). Why Engagement Matters: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives of User Engagement in Digital Media, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-27446-1_1 ↗
28. Measuring engagement in video game-based environments: Investigation of the User Engagement Scale10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.001 ↗
29. Quantifying engagement: Measuring player involvement in human–avatar interactions10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.044 ↗
30. Reliance on head versus eyes in the gaze following of great apes and human infants: The cooperative eye hypothesis10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.10.001 ↗
31. Gaze and attention management for embodied conversational agents10.1145/2724731 ↗
32. Gaze and turn-taking behavior in casual conversational interactions10.1145/2499474.2499481 ↗
33. Rich, C., Ponsler, B., Holroyd, A., and Sidner, C.L. (2010, January 2–5). Recognizing engagement in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Osaka, Japan.10.1109/HRI.2010.5453163 ↗
34. Kompatsiari, K., Tikhanoff, V., Ciardo, F., Metta, G., and Wykowska, A. (2017, January 22–24). The importance of mutual gaze in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the Social Robotics: 9th International Conference, ICSR 2017, Tsukuba, Japan.10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_44 ↗
35. Individual differences in the emotional modulation of gaze-cuing10.1080/02699931.2018.1495618 ↗
36. Conceptualizing and measuring engagement: An analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale
37. I can see it in your eyes: Perceived gaze direction impacts ERP and behavioural measures of affective theory of mind10.1016/j.cortex.2021.05.024 ↗
38. Cho, A., Park, S., Lee, H., and Whang, M. (2021). Non-Contact Measurement of Empathy Based on Micro-Movement Synchronization. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21237818 ↗
39. Empathy and identification in cinema10.1111/j.1475-4975.2010.00211.x ↗
40. Fantasy and identification in empathy10.1080/21674086.1974.11926658 ↗
41. Ickes, W.J. (1997). Empathic Accuracy, Guilford Press. Available online: https://books.google.co.jp/books?hl=en&lr=&id=7ob3yJdFqQC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=ickes+1997+empathic+accuracy&ots=YX1sxuAnpZ&sig=q_NI8xtibNIz7ngZ6uPYcasGqEo#v=onepage&q=ickes.
42. The neural bases for empathy
43. Electroencephalogram and physiological signal analysis for assessing flow in games10.1109/TCIAIG.2013.2260340 ↗
44. Effects of loratadine and cetirizine on actual driving and psychometric test performance, and EEG during driving10.1007/BF00280119 ↗
45. Low cost eye tracking: The current panorama10.1155/2016/8680541 ↗
46. Precise localization of eye centers in low resolution color images10.1016/j.imavis.2015.01.006 ↗
47. Eye gaze tracking reveals heightened attention to food in adults with binge eating when viewing images of real-world scenes10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.046 ↗
48. Social communication with virtual agents: The effects of body and gaze direction on attention and emotional responding in human observers10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.05.007 ↗
49. Interaction of audition and vision in the recognition of oral speech stimuli10.1044/jshr.1202.423 ↗
50. Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise10.3109/03005368709077786 ↗
51. Hypnotizability, laterality of eye-movements and functional brain asymmetry10.2466/pms.1969.28.3.927 ↗
52. Kiilavuori, H., Sariola, V., Peltola, M.J., and Hietanen, J.K. (2021). Making eye contact with a robot: Psychophysiological responses to eye contact with a human and with a humanoid robot. Biol. Psychol., 158.10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107989 ↗
53. I can see it in your eyes: Gaze as an implicit cue of uncanniness and task performance in repeated interactions with robots10.3389/frobt.2021.645956 ↗