journal article·2023-09Open access

Research on the influence of stamping materials on resist flow and the residual layer in thermal nanoimprint lithography

Hong‐Wen Sun, Tian‐Hua Tang, Jing‐Sheng Wang, Li‐Jun Gu, Yan‐Chun Huang, Ya‐Ru Li

Micro & Nano Letters· Volume 18· Issue 9-12

Abstract

Abstract Various stamp materials can significantly affect the filling quality of nanoimprint lithography (NIL). The effects of different stamp materials on the imprinting process were investigated from the angles of residual layer (RL) thickness, contact pressure, and filling proportion. The selection of various stamp materials affects the thickness and uniformity of the RL. Soft stamps (PDMS, PU) leave a thin but uneven RL distribution, while the RL imprinted by hard stamps (Si, Ni) is thicker but more uniform. The contact pressure using soft stamps is relatively more evenly distributed than hard stamps. The uneven distribution of contact pressure leads to poor cavity‐filling proportion, especially for hard stamps. This study offers guidance for choosing proper nanoimprint stamp materials for different NIL applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Advancements in Photolithography Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Information Engineering Changzhou Vocational Institute of Mechatronic Technology Changzhou China

School of Microelectronics Shandong University Jinan China

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.11485110.1063/1.114851 ↗
2. 10.1364/JOSAB.39904810.1364/JOSAB.399048 ↗
3. 10.1002/andp.20230019510.1002/andp.202300195 ↗
4. 10.1002/andp.20220066110.1002/andp.202200661 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mne.2023.10018210.1016/j.mne.2023.100182 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mee.2021.11163610.1016/j.mee.2021.111636 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12686710.1016/j.matlet.2019.126867 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.optmat.2021.11146710.1016/j.optmat.2021.111467 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mee.2012.07.07110.1016/j.mee.2012.07.071 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.10.01110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.10.011 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15171210.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151712 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.10797010.1016/j.optlastec.2022.107970 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mee.2018.07.00910.1016/j.mee.2018.07.009 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mee.2008.12.05110.1016/j.mee.2008.12.051 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mee.2022.11175210.1016/j.mee.2022.111752 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.mne.2020.10007910.1016/j.mne.2020.100079 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mne.2022.10011810.1016/j.mne.2022.100118 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.mee.2012.07.08310.1016/j.mee.2012.07.083 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.02.03710.1016/j.apsusc.2014.02.037 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.10814410.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108144 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10910710.1016/j.matdes.2020.109107 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0167-9317(00)00414-710.1016/S0167-9317(00)00414-7 ↗