Improvement of the microcapacitive humidity sensor by the package optimisation
Source abstract
Abstract
To achieve good properties such as the hysteresis, repeatability, stability, linearity and response time in this work, the optimisation processes of the package are presented for a microcapacitive humidity sensor. On the basis of theoretical analysis, the optimisation will be conducted in two ways, including reducing the effect of parasitic capacitance in the microcapacitive humidity sensor measurement system and decreasing the adsorption of water molecules on the package surface. The reduction of the influence of parasitic capacitance was realised by reasonably designing the PCB and the isolation package. The decrease of water adsorption on the package surface was achieved by coating a layer of hydrophobic material. The experimental results proved that the package optimisation enables the humidity sensor with better performance; for instance the hysteresis error is more than six times lower, the repeatability error is more than ten times lower, and the temperature drift is about two times lower, and the linear fitting error is three times lower than the pre‐optimised humidity sensor. Especially, the humidity response time in both adsorption and desorption is extremely improved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology Aerospace Information Research Institute Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing People's Republic of China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing People's Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. MasonA.YazdiN.NajafiK.et al.: ‘A low‐power wireless microinstrumentation system for environmental monitoring’ Stockholm Sweden 1995 pp.107–11010.1109/SENSOR.1995.717104 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.sna.2014.07.01510.1016/j.sna.2014.07.015 ↗
3. 10.1002/978352765241910.1002/9783527652419 ↗
4. 10.1109/TIM.2019.292143810.1109/TIM.2019.2921438 ↗
5. StarkeE.TurkeA.KrauseM.et al.: ‘Flexible polymer humidity sensor fabricated by inkjet printing Technische Universität Dresden’.2011 16th Int. Institute of Semiconductors and Microsystems 01062 Dresden Germany'Solid‐State Sensors Actuators Microsystems Conf. (TRANSDUCERS) Beijing People's Republic of China 2011 pp.1152–115510.1109/TRANSDUCERS.2011.5969254 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.03210.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.032 ↗
7. 10.1109/JMEMS.2009.203658410.1109/JMEMS.2009.2036584 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0924‐4247(01)00684‐710.1016/S0924‐4247(01)00684‐7 ↗
9. 10.1088/0960‐1317/19/10/10501710.1088/0960‐1317/19/10/105017 ↗
10. LiuJ.DuL.PanY.et al.: ‘Reducing the effect of parasitic capacitance on the micro‐capacitive humidity sensor’.Proc. of the 14th Annual IEEE Int. Conf. on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems Bangkok Thailand 11–14 April2019 pp.494–49710.1109/NEMS.2019.8915594 ↗
11. LaconteJ.WilmartV.FlandreD.et al.: ‘High‐sensitivity capacitive humidity sensor using 3‐layer patterned polyimide sensing film’.SENSORS 2003 IEEE Toronto Ont. 2003 pp.372–37710.1109/ICSENS.2003.1278961 ↗
12. 10.1088/1755‐1315/231/1/01205310.1088/1755‐1315/231/1/012053 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.05.02410.1016/j.snb.2019.05.024 ↗