journal article·2019-08

Effect of Joule heating and temperature‐dependent zeta potential on electroosmotic flow measurements in calorimetric flow sensors

Ahmad Altayyeb, Yu Sun, Mohamed Abdelgawad

Micro & Nano Letters· Volume 14· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

This work reports a theoretical investigation of the effect of Joule heating and temperature‐dependent zeta potential on the electroosmotic flow measurements in calorimetric flow sensing. Joule heating resulting from the applied electric field in electroosmotic flow increases the temperature of the liquid inside the sensor and, consequently, modifies the sensor performance. The model presented in this paper considers temperature dependence of the wall zeta potential on the sensor characteristics. Additionally, all liquid properties such as density, viscosity, relative permittivity, specific heat, thermal conductivity, and electrical conductivity are taken as temperature‐dependent properties. A comparison between the characteristics of the modelled sensor in the presence and absence of Joule heating is presented. The effect of heater power on sensor characteristics is also discussed. Simulation results reveal that Joule heating and temperature dependence of zeta potential have a significant effect on the behaviour of calorimetric flow sensors, which must be considered when this type of sensor is used to measure electroosmotic flow. Temperature dependence of zeta potential, in particular, affected the velocity distribution inside the sensor considerably.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Mechanical and Optical Resonators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Nanotechnology Zewail City of Science and Technology Giza Egypt

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Toronto Toronto Canada

Department of Mechanical Engineering Assiut University Assiut Egypt

Department of Mechanical Engineering American University of Sharjah United Arab Emirates

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Micromachined flow sensors – a review
2. 10.3390/mi303055010.3390/mi3030550 ↗
3. 10.1016/0924‐4247(93)80010‐E10.1016/0924‐4247(93)80010‐E ↗
4. Barreto NetoA.G.S.LimaA.M.N.MoreiraC.S.et al.: ‘Design and theoretical analysis of a bidirectional calorimetric flow sensor (Fig.1)’.Conf. Rec. – IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conf. (I2MTC) Proc. Barcelona Spain 2014 pp.542–54510.1109/I2MTC.2014.6860803 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.492105110.1063/1.4921051 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.sna.2013.05.01810.1016/j.sna.2013.05.018 ↗
7. A chip‐integrated highly variable thermal flow rate sensor
8. 10.1088/0957‐0233/24/8/08400210.1088/0957‐0233/24/8/084002 ↗
9. GlatzlT.SteinerH.KohlF.et al.: ‘Characterization and optimization of a thermal flow sensor on circuit board level’.19th IEEE Int. Conf. Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA 2014) 201410.1109/ETFA.2014.7005101 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.02.02010.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.02.020 ↗
11. 10.1039/b315036d10.1039/b315036d ↗
12. 10.1039/b306158b10.1039/b306158b ↗
13. 10.1007/s10665‐005‐9019‐910.1007/s10665‐005‐9019‐9 ↗
14. Temperature‐dependent streaming potentials: 1. theory
15. 10.1088/0960‐1317/12/6/32910.1088/0960‐1317/12/6/329 ↗
16. 10.1002/elps.20050031410.1002/elps.200500314 ↗
17. 10.1002/elps.20050068110.1002/elps.200500681 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10404‐006‐0100‐010.1007/s10404‐006‐0100‐0 ↗
19. Hunter D.J. · 1988
20. 10.1006/jcis.2000.678310.1006/jcis.2000.6783 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apm.2018.11.05010.1016/j.apm.2018.11.050 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20130053710.1002/aenm.201300537 ↗
23. 10.1039/C4LC00615A10.1039/C4LC00615A ↗
24. 10.1007/978-1-4614-5491-510.1007/978-1-4614-5491-5 ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0229033810.1007/BF02290338 ↗
26. 10.1023/A:100662841963610.1023/A:1006628419636 ↗