journal article·2019-05Open access

Strip‐based nano‐silver biocomposite construct for rapid screening of aqueous mercury

Raju Dugyala, Mir Zahoor Gul, Sriramoju Manoj Kumar, Sashidhar Rao Beedu

Micro & Nano Letters· Volume 14· Issue 6

Abstract

A simple, rapid and a cost‐effective colorimetric method for detection of Hg 2+ in an aqueous system using silver nanoparticle (AgNP) has been developed in the present study. AgNPs were synthesised using gum kondagogu (GK), a natural biopolymer that acts as both reducing and stabilising agent. The stability of GK‐AgNPs composites was determined by zeta potential and was observed to be −30.43 mV. The yellow colour spot on the nitrocellulose membrane turned colourless at Hg 2+ concentration of 20 ppm in aqueous solution, which can be observed visually. By using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, it was observed that as the concentration of Hg 2+ increases the Ag concentration decreased. Further, scanning electron microscopy and energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy were used to confirm the morphological changes on membrane before and after treating with Hg 2 + . The interference of other metal ions was also studied to validate Hg 2+ specificity. This method was successfully employed to screen Hg 2+ in industrial effluents. In summary, this study entails the development of a nitrocellulose membrane based mercury sensor that has practical applicability for on‐site screening of Hg 2+ contamination in the aqueous system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mercury impact and mitigation studies · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biochemistry University College of Science Osmania University Telangana 500007 India

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0021‐9673(97)00829‐710.1016/S0021‐9673(97)00829‐7 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.108594110.1126/science.1085941 ↗
3. 10.1002/jat.255015061010.1002/jat.2550150610 ↗
4. 10.1056/NEJMra02247110.1056/NEJMra022471 ↗
5. 10.1039/B516025C10.1039/B516025C ↗
6. 10.1631/jzus.B130000410.1631/jzus.B1300004 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.trac.2004.01.00110.1016/j.trac.2004.01.001 ↗
8. 10.1021/ja068879r10.1021/ja068879r ↗
9. 10.1039/b501913c10.1039/b501913c ↗
10. 10.1021/ja051772410.1021/ja0517724 ↗
11. 10.1021/ol061558010.1021/ol0615580 ↗
12. 10.1246/cl.2004.160810.1246/cl.2004.1608 ↗
13. 10.1246/cl.2005.89810.1246/cl.2005.898 ↗
14. 10.1002/anie.20080096010.1002/anie.200800960 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20060257810.1002/adma.200602578 ↗
16. 10.1021/cr068126n10.1021/cr068126n ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.01810.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.018 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.07.00610.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.07.006 ↗
19. 10.1586/erm.09.3310.1586/erm.09.33 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10971‐006‐6969‐y10.1007/s10971‐006‐6969‐y ↗
21. 10.1021/nl071108g10.1021/nl071108g ↗
22. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.10.03610.1016/j.arabjc.2014.10.036 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.10.01210.1016/j.talanta.2013.10.012 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2007.05.00610.1016/j.foodhyd.2007.05.006 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.05.03410.1016/j.carbpol.2010.05.034 ↗
26. 10.1007/BF0111428810.1007/BF01114288 ↗