Role of interfacial surface area on the physical phenomena of nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
Improvement in the material properties of nanocomposite materials is often stated to be because of the interfacial surface area (ISA) or inter‐filler distance (IFD). Several models were suggested for understanding the material properties of nanocomposites. The occurrence of a thin surface layer surrounding nanoparticles, where the material properties would be different from the filler and filled material, has been proposed earlier. In the absence of a commercial technology to obtain the ideal placement of nanoparticles at specified locations in the material matrix, the particle dispersion is driven by practical limitations. If the surface layer and IFD are the criteria for goodness of performance, ideally, both of these should tend towards improvements with increase in filler content. However, experimental evidence suggests the saturation of material properties with filler content. This saturation needs to be fully understood in order to optimise filler content. In this reported work, the effect of filler content on inter‐particle distance and ISA in nanocomposites has been investigated. The reason for the observed saturation in material properties with filler content is explained. It is mathematically shown that the ISA also shows similar characteristics as a physical phenomenon supporting the role of the ISA in the material properties of nanocomposites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena · Dielectric materials and actuators · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Ropar Rupnagar 140001 India
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/T‐DEI.2008.444675410.1109/T‐DEI.2008.4446754 ↗
2. ReddyC.C.GosyowakiM.MurataY.SekiguchiY.: ‘Superior thermal breakdown performance of MgO‐LDPE nanocomposite materials for HVDC insulation’.Int. Symp. on Electrical Insulating Materials 2008 (ISEIM 2008) Yokkaichi Japan September2008 pp.661–66410.1109/ISEIM.2008.4664494 ↗
3. 10.1109/TDEI.2004.134978210.1109/TDEI.2004.1349782 ↗
4. 10.1109/TDEI.2009.536159710.1109/TDEI.2009.5361597 ↗
5. OhkiY.IshimotoK.KanegaeE.et al.: ‘Suppression of packet‐like space charge formation in LDPE by the addition of magnesia nanofillers’.IEEE 9th Int. Conf. on the Properties and Applications of Dielectric Materials 2009 (ICPADM 2009) Harbin China July2009 pp.9–1410.1109/ICPADM.2009.5252266 ↗
6. KanegaeE.OhkiY.TanakaT.SekiguchiY.MurataY.ReddyC.C.: ‘Space charge behavior in multi‐layered dielectrics with LDPE and LDPE/MgO nanocomposites’.Proc. 10th IEEE Int. Conf. on Solid Dielectrics (ICSD 2010) Potsdam China July2010 pp.1–410.1109/ICSD.2010.5568093 ↗
7. 10.1109/TDEI.2005.152218610.1109/TDEI.2005.1522186 ↗
8. TanakaT.: ‘Promising characteristics of nanocomposite dielectrics’.Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Properties and Applications of Dielectric Materials Bali Indonesia 2006 June2006 pp.12–2210.1109/ICPADM.2006.284108 ↗
9. OkazakiT.OkuzumiS.ImazawaS.et al.: ‘Electric characteristics of MgO/LDPE nanocomposite up to breakdown under DC ramp voltage’.IEEE Conf. on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena 2009 (CEIDP ’09) Virginia Beach VA USA October2009 pp.654–65710.1109/CEIDP.2009.5377863 ↗
10. OkuzumiS.MurakamiY.NagaoM.SekiguchiY.ReddyC.C.MurataY.: ‘DC breakdown strength and conduction current of MgO/LDPE composite influenced by filler size’.2008 Annual Report Conf. on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena 2008 (CEIDP 2008) Québec City Canada October2008 pp.722–72510.1109/CEIDP.2008.4772933 ↗
11. MurakamiY.OkazakiT.NagaoM.SekiguchiY.ReddyC.C.MurataY.: ‘Space charge formation and conduction current of MgO/LDPE nanocomposite under DC ramp field’.2010 Annual Report Conf. on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena 2010 (CEIDP 2010) West Lafayette IN USA October2010 pp.1–410.1109/CEIDP.2010.5724004 ↗
12. MurakamiY.ImazawaS.KurimotoM.et al.: ‘DC breakdown characteristic on LDPE/MgO nanocomposite influenced by DC prestress’.2011 Annual Report Conf. on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena 2011 (CEIDP 2011) Cancun Mexico October2011 pp.334–33710.1109/CEIDP.2011.6232664 ↗
13. MurakamiY.OkazakiT.OkuzumiS.et al.: ‘Temperature dependent space charge formation up to the breakdown under DC ramp voltage in MgO/LDPE nanocomposite’.2008 Annual Report Conf. on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena 2008 (CEIDP 2008) Québec City Canada October2008 pp.686–68910.1109/CEIDP.2008.4772932 ↗
14. MurataY.GoshowakiM.ReddyC.C.et al.: ‘Investigation of space charge distribution and volume resistivity of XLPE/MgO nanocomposite material under DC voltage application’.Proc. Int. Symp. on Electrical Insulating Materials 2008 (ISEIM 2008) Yokkaichi Japan September2008 pp.502–50510.1109/ISEIM.2008.4664468 ↗
15. YoshidaJ.MaezawaT.MiyakeH.et al.: ‘Space charge accumulation and breakdown in LDPE and LDPE/MgO nano‐composite under high dc stress at various temperatures’.IEEE Conf. on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena 2009 (CEIDP ’09) Virginia Beach VA USA October2009 pp.150–15310.1109/CEIDP.2009.5377837 ↗
16. MurakamiY.OkazakiT.NagaoM.SekiguchiY.ReddyC.C.MurataY.: ‘Space charge formation in low‐density polyethylene up to breakdown influenced by addition of MgO nano‐filler under DC ramp voltage’.IEEE Conf. on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena 2009 (CEIDP ’09) Virginia Beach VA USA October2009 pp.685–68810.1109/CEIDP.2009.5377736 ↗
17. 10.1109/TDEI.2005.151109210.1109/TDEI.2005.1511092 ↗
18. TanakaT.: ‘Multi‐core model for nanodielectrics as fine structures of interaction zones’.2005 Annual Report Conf. on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena 2005 (CEIDP ’05) Nashville TN USA October2005 pp.713–71610.1109/CEIDP.2005.1560782 ↗
19. TanakaT.: ‘Nanodielectics: how does the presence of interfaces influence behaviour?’Int. Conf. on Power and Energy Systems (ICPS) December2011 pp.1–410.1109/ICPES.2011.6156694 ↗
20. 10.1109/TDEI.2009.536159710.1109/TDEI.2009.5361597 ↗