journal article·2020-08Open access

Pulsed plasma chemical synthesis of Fe 2 O 3 @TiO 2 core–shell nanocomposites

Galina Kholodnaya, Roman Sazonov, Denis Ponomarev, Alexander Sivkov, Ivan Shanenkov, Fedor Konusov, Ruslan Gadirov

Micro & Nano Letters· Volume 15· Issue 10

Abstract

The Letter presents the results of the experimental investigation on the synthesis of core–shell structured nanocomposites. Iron oxide, which served as a nucleus in the composite, was synthesised using the plasma dynamic method. The composite shell was titanium oxide produced by the pulsed plasma chemical method. Average sizes of nanoparticles were estimated between 50 and 150 nm in the Fe 2 O 3 @TiO 2 core–shell structured composite nanoparticles using TEM. A distinctive feature of the morphology of the synthesised Fe 2 O 3 @TiO 2 core–shell is that the core entirely encapsulates clusters of titanium oxide nanoparticles. The wall thickness of the coating is 5–10 nm. The spectral dependence of the absorption coefficient α ( hν ) was calculated for the Fe 2 O 3 @TiO 2 composite. The interband absorption parameters are determined in the energy intervals Δ′( hν ) upon approximation of the absorption spectra. The bandgap for indirect and direct allowed transitions is 1.36 and 1.97 eV for and , respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles · Iron oxide chemistry and applications · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Tomsk Polytechnic University 30 Lenin Avenue Tomsk Russia

Siberian Physical‐Technical Institute Tomsk State University 1 Novosobornaya Sq. Tomsk Russia

Funding

Russian Science Foundation · Russian Foundation for Basic Research

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20180699110.1002/adma.201806991 ↗
2. 10.1080/17435390.2018.147153710.1080/17435390.2018.1471537 ↗
3. Dual‐stimuli‐responsive, polymer‐microsphere‐encapsulated CuS nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging guided synergistic chemo‐photothermal therapy
4. 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.01.06710.1016/j.powtec.2018.01.067 ↗
5. 10.1039/C6NR02430K10.1039/C6NR02430K ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.05.02010.1016/j.jcis.2019.05.020 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.catcom.2017.03.02210.1016/j.catcom.2017.03.022 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.12.17910.1016/j.jallcom.2013.12.179 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.02.02410.1016/j.apcatb.2019.02.024 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.04110.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.041 ↗
11. 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20121029110.3866/PKU.WHXB201210291 ↗
12. 10.1039/c3cp53178c10.1039/c3cp53178c ↗
13. 10.1002/ejic.20140281610.1002/ejic.201402816 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10853‐015‐8964‐610.1007/s10853‐015‐8964‐6 ↗
15. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b0095610.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00956 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.07.06010.1016/j.jiec.2016.07.060 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.18510.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.185 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.12.07210.1016/j.jmmm.2015.12.072 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.01910.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.019 ↗
20. 10.1023/B:INET.0000032909.92515.b710.1023/B:INET.0000032909.92515.b7 ↗
21. 10.1080/1536383X.2017.135682410.1080/1536383X.2017.1356824 ↗
22. 10.1002/zaac.20050028310.1002/zaac.200500283 ↗
23. 10.1134/S102745101103011610.1134/S1027451011030116 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.779510.1103/PhysRevB.52.7795 ↗