Fabrication and mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite filled polyetheretherketone functional gradient biomaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydroxyapatite filled polyetheretherketone functional gradient biomaterials (HA/PEEK FGBm) were fabricated through layer‐stacking method and in combination with hot press moulding technology. The influences of total HA content, HA concentration difference between adjacent layers (HCDBAL) and annealing treatment on the tensile properties of HA/PEEK FGBm were investigated. The results indicated that the tensile strength and tensile fracture strain of HA/PEEK FGBm decreased with the increasing total HA content. Contrarily, the tensile modulus of HA/PEEK FGBm increases with the rise of total HA content. The tensile strength and modulus of the HA/PEEK FGBm first increased and then decreased with the rise of HCDBAL. Such change in behaviour was more obvious for the HA/PEEK FGBm with 30% total HA content. Furthermore, the tensile strength and modulus of the HA/PEEK FGBm were obviously improved after annealing treatment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Material Science & Engineering An Hui University of Science and Technology Huai Nan 232001 People's Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.03.01110.1016/j.addr.2007.03.011 ↗
2. 10.1039/c3ra23425h10.1039/c3ra23425h ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.07910.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.079 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.01910.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.019 ↗
5. 10.1002/jbm.b.3287510.1002/jbm.b.32875 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.05.00410.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.05.004 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.msec.2012.03.00310.1016/j.msec.2012.03.003 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.01610.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.016 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.wear.2013.04.03210.1016/j.wear.2013.04.032 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.triboint.2012.07.00710.1016/j.triboint.2012.07.007 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11665‐008‐9319‐010.1007/s11665‐008‐9319‐0 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.011 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.01310.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013 ↗
14. Effect of β‐TCP filled polyetheretherketone on osteoblast cell proliferation in vitro
15. 10.1016/S0142‐1123(03)00080‐X10.1016/S0142‐1123(03)00080‐X ↗
16. Mechanical properties and in vitro bioactivity of carbon fiber‐reinforced polyetheretherketone‐hydroxyapatite (PEEK‐HA) composites for biomedical applications
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.01.06410.1016/j.msea.2011.01.064 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.12.00710.1016/j.matlet.2011.12.007 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.04.07810.1016/j.msea.2004.04.078 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.02810.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.028 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.10.03110.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.10.031 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10971‐014‐3287‐710.1007/s10971‐014‐3287‐7 ↗
23. Fabrication and characterisation of functional gradient hydroxyapatite reinforced poly (ether ether ketone) biocomposites’
24. 10.1016/S0142‐9612(03)00028‐010.1016/S0142‐9612(03)00028‐0 ↗
25. 10.1016/S1359‐835X(00)00009‐910.1016/S1359‐835X(00)00009‐9 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.07.00210.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.07.002 ↗