Biological Practices and Fields, Missing Pieces of the Biomimetics’ Methodological Puzzle
Source abstract
Abstract
Facing current biomimetics impediments, recent studies have supported the integration within biomimetic teams of a new actor having biological knowledge and know-how. This actor is referred to as the “biomimetician” in this article. However, whereas biology is often considered a homogenous whole in the methodological literature targeting biomimetics, it actually gathers fundamentally different fields. Each of these fields is structured around specific practices, tools, and reasoning. Based on this observation, we wondered which knowledge and know-how, and so biological fields, should characterize biomimeticians. Following the design research methodology, this article thus investigates the operational integration of two biological fields, namely ecology and phylogenetics, as a starting point in the establishment of the biomimetician’s biological tools and practices. After a descriptive phase identifying specific needs and potential conceptual bridges, we presented various ways of applying biological expertise during biomimetic processes in the prescriptive phase of the study. Finally, we discussed current limitations and future research axes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Design Education and Practice · Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Product Design and Innovation, LCPI, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology HESAM University, 151 Bd de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Technical Committee: ISO/TC 266 Biomimetics (2015). ISO/TC266 18458:2015: Biomimetics–Terminology, Concepts and Methodology, ISO. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/62500.html.
2. Ahmed-Kristensen, S., Christensen, B.T., and Lenau, T.A. (2014, January 19–22). Naturally original: Stimulating creative design through biological analogies and Random images. Proceedings of the International Design Conference, DESIGN, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
3. Biologically inspired design for environment10.1117/12.2558498 ↗
4. Rovalo, E., and McCardle, J. (2019). Performance Based Abstraction of Biomimicry Design Principles using Prototyping. Designs, 3.10.3390/designs3030038 ↗
5. Biomimetics: Process, tools and practice10.1088/1748-3190/12/1/011002 ↗
6. Kruiper, R., Vincent, J.F.V., Abraham, E., Soar, R., Konstas, I., Chen-Burger, J., and Desmulliez, M. (2018). Towards a Design Process for Computer-Aided Biomimetics. Biomimetics, 3.10.3390/biomimetics3030014 ↗
7. Interdisciplinarity: Bring biologists into biomimetics10.1038/529277a ↗
8. Biomimetics, where are the biologists?10.1080/09544828.2019.1642462 ↗
9. Hashemi Farzaneh, H. (2020). Bio-inspired design: The impact of collaboration between engineers and biologists on analogical transfer and ideation. Res. Eng. Des., 1–24.10.1007/s00163-020-00333-w ↗
10. Yen, J., Helms, M.E., Goel, A.K., Tovey, C., and Weissburg, M. (2014). Adaptive Evolution of Teaching Practices in Biologically Inspired Design. Biologically Inspired Design, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-5248-4_7 ↗
11. Gomi, T. (2001). Using Biological Inspiration to Build Artificial Life That Locomotes. Evolutionary Robotics, Springer. From Intelligent Robotics to Artificial Life. EvoRobots 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.10.1007/3-540-45502-7 ↗
12. Lindemann, U., and Gramann, J. (2004, January 19–22). Engineering Design Using Biological Principles. Proceedings of the International Design Conference, DESIGN, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
13. Lenau, T.A. (2009, January 24–27). Biomimetics as a design methodology—Possibilities and challenges. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, Standford, CA, USA.
14. Goel, A.K., Vattam, S., Wiltgen, B., and Helms, M. (2014). Information-Processing Theories of Biologically Inspired Design. Biologically Inspired Design, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-5248-4_6 ↗
15. Fayemi, P.-E., Maranzana, N., Aoussat, A., and Bersano, G. (2014, January 19–22). Bio-inspired design characterisation and its links with problem solving tools. Proceedings of the International Design Conference, DESIGN, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
16. Biomimetics and its tools10.1680/jbibn.16.00010 ↗
17. A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas
18. Function-based, biologically inspired concept generation10.1017/S0890060410000375 ↗
19. Fayemi, P.-E. (2016). Innovation through Bio-Inspired Design: Suggestion of a Structuring Model for Biomimetic Process and Methods, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology Hesam University.
20. Ohno, T. (1978). Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production, Productivity Press. [1st ed.].
21. Altshuller, G.S. (1984). Creativity as an Exact Science: The Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.10.1201/9781466593442 ↗
22. Hoagland, M.B., and Dodson, B. (1995). The Way Life Works, Crown. [1st ed.].
23. Tinsley, A., Midha, P.A., Nagel, R.L., McAdams, D.A., Stone, R.B., and Shu, L.H. (2007, January 4–7). Exploring the use of functional models as a foundation for biomimetic conceptual design. Proceedings of the ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
24. Biomimetics: Its practice and theory10.1098/rsif.2006.0127 ↗
25. Vattam, S.S., and Goel, A.K. (2013, January 19–22). Seeking bioinspiration online: A descriptive account. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, Seoul, Korea.
26. Clarity of objectives and working principles enhances the success of biomimetic programs10.1088/1748-3190/aa86ff ↗
27. Chirazi, J., Wanieck, K., Fayemi, P.-E., Zollfrank, C., and Jacobs, S.R. (2019). What Do We Learn from Good Practices of Biologically Inspired Design in Innovation?. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9040650 ↗
28. (2018, November 23). Biomimicry Institute AskNature—Innovation Inspired by Nature. Available online: https://asknature.org/.
29. Vattam, S.S., Wiltgen, B., Helms, M.E., Goel, A.K., and Yen, J. (2011). DANE: Fostering Creativity in and through Biologically Inspired Design. Design Creativity 2010, Springer.10.1007/978-0-85729-224-7_16 ↗
30. A methodology for supporting “transfer” in biomimetic design10.1017/S0890060410000351 ↗
31. Vattam, S.S., and Goel, A.K. (2011, January 28–31). Foraging for Inspiration: Understanding and Supporting the Online Information Seeking Practices of Biologically Inspired Designers. Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Washington, DC, USA.10.1115/DETC2011-48238 ↗
32. SEABIRD: Scalable search for systematic biologically inspired design10.1017/S0890060415000177 ↗
33. A natural-language approach to biomimetic design10.1017/S0890060410000363 ↗
34. Kruiper, R., Vincent, J.F.V., Chen-Burger, J., Desmulliez, M.P.Y., and Konstas, I. (2020). A Scientific Information Extraction Dataset for Nature Inspired Engineering. arXiv.
35. McInerney, S., Khakipoor, B., Garner, A., Houette, T., Unsworth, C., Rupp, A., Weiner, N., Vincent, J.F.V., Nagel, J.K.S., and Niewiarowski, P. (2018). E2BMO: Facilitating User Interaction with a BioMimetic Ontology via Semantic Translation and Interface Design. Designs, 2.10.3390/designs2040053 ↗
36. Development of an ontology of biomimetics based on altshuller’s matrix
37. Deldin, J.-M., and Schuknecht, M. (2014). The AskNature Database: Enabling Solutions in Biomimetic Design. Biologically Inspired Design, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-5248-4_2 ↗
38. Evaluating the impact of Idea-Inspire 4.0 on analogical transfer of concepts10.1017/S0890060418000136 ↗
39. Biomimetic design through natural language analysis to facilitate cross-domain information retrieval10.1017/S0890060407070138 ↗
40. Goel, A., McAdams, D., and Stone, R. (2014). A Thesaurus for Bioinspired Engineering Design. Biologically Inspired Design, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-5248-4 ↗
41. Stroble, J.K., Stone, R.B., McAdams, D.A., and Watkins, S.E. (2009, January 30–31). An Engineering-to-Biology Thesaurus To Promote Better Collaboration, Creativity and Discovery. Proceedings of the 19th CIRP Design Conference–Competitive Design, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK.10.1109/MPOT.2009.934892 ↗
42. TRIZ-based algorithm for Biomimetic design10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.417 ↗
43. The trade-off: A central concept for biomimetics10.1680/jbibn.16.00005 ↗
44. Kaiser, M.K., Hashemi Farzaneh, H., and Lindemann, U. (2014, January 19–22). Bioscrabble—The role of different types of search terms when searching for biological inspiration in biological research articles. Proceedings of the International Design Conference, DESIGN, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
45. Helms, K.M., Hashemi Farzaneh, H., and Lindemann, U. (2015). Creating bio-inspired solution ideas using biological research articles. Multidisciplinary Contributions to the Science of Creative Thinking, Springer.10.1007/978-981-287-618-8_13 ↗
46. Helms, M., and Goel, A.K. (2014, January 17–20). The Four-Box Method of Problem Specification and Analogy Evaluation in Biologically Inspired Design. Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (ASME), Buffalo, NY, USA.
47. A methodology for the generation of biomimetic design concepts10.1080/00038628.2014.922458 ↗
48. A study on metadata structure and recommenders of biological systems to support bio-inspired design10.1016/j.engappai.2016.10.003 ↗
49. Biologically inspired design: Process and products10.1016/j.destud.2009.04.003 ↗
50. Kennedy, E., and Niewiarowski, P. (2018). Biomimicry: Do Frames of Inquiry Support Search and Identification of Biological Models?. Designs, 2.10.3390/designs2030027 ↗
51. Fayemi, P.-E., Maranzana, N., Aoussat, A., Chekchak, T., and Bersano, G. (2015, January 27–30). Modeling biological systems to facilitate their selection during a bio-inspired design process. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, Milan, Italy.
52. Biomimetics - Using nature to inspire human innovation10.1088/1748-3182/1/1/P01 ↗
53. Biomimetics—A review10.1243/09544119JEIM561 ↗
54. Goel, A., McAdams, D., and Stone, R. (2014). Evolution and Bio-Inspired Design: Natural Limitations. Biologically Inspired Design, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-5248-4 ↗
55. An attempt to reveal synergies between biology and mechanical engineering10.1243/09544062JMES890 ↗
56. Towards a theoretical clarification of biomimetics using conceptual tools from engineering design10.1088/1748-3190/aa967c ↗
57. Baumeister, D., Tocke, R., Dwyer, J., Ritter, S., and Benyus, J. (2013). Biomimicry Resource Handbook: A Seed Bank of Knowledge and Best Practices, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. [2013rd ed.].
58. McGregor, S.L.T. (2013). Transdisciplinarity and Biomimicry. Transdiscipl. J. Eng. Sci., 4.10.22545/2013/00042 ↗
59. A general system for coding taxonomic descriptions10.2307/1219595 ↗
60. Dallwitz, M.J., Paine, T.A., and Zurcher, E.J. (2020, July 24). 1999 Onwards. User’s Guide to the DELTA Editor. Version: 22nd August 2020. Available online: https://www.delta-intkey.com/www/uguide.htm.
61. Simplifying the jargon of community ecology: A conceptual approach10.1086/285850 ↗
62. Smart by name, smart by nature10.1088/0964-1726/9/3/301 ↗
63. Bar-Cohen, Y. (2011). Biologically inspired design: A tool for interdisciplinary education. Biomimetics: Nature-Based Innovation, Taylor & Francis.
64. Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of the Species, John Murray. [1st ed.].
65. Distinct and combined effects of disciplinary composition and methodological support on problem solving in groups10.1111/caim.12258 ↗
66. Hashemi Farzaneh, H., Helms, K.M., and Lindemann, U. (2015, January 27–30). Visual representations as a bridge for engineers and biologists in bio-inspired design collaborations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, Milan, Italy.
67. Graeff, E., Maranzana, N., and Aoussat, A. (2018, January 5–6). Conception biomimétique: Quels acteurs pour quelles attentes? (Biomimetic Design: Which actors for what expectations?). Proceedings of the CONFERE Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
68. Graeff, E., Maranzana, N., and Aoussat, A. (2019, January 5–8). Engineers’ and Biologists’ Roles during Biomimetic Design Processes, Towards a Methodological Symbiosis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, Delft, The Netherlands.10.1017/dsi.2019.35 ↗
69. Comparing novelty of designs from biological-inspiration with those from brainstorming10.1080/09544828.2017.1393504 ↗
70. Sane, S.P. (2016). Bioinspiration and biomimicry: What can engineers learn from biologists?. J. Appl. Sci. Eng.
71. Blessing, L.T.M., and Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM, a Design Research Methodology, Springer.10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1 ↗
72. Bio-inspired design: An overview investigating open questions from the broader field of design-by-analogy10.1115/1.4028289 ↗
73. (2019, June 24). British Ecological Society Ecology Is a Science That Matters. Available online: https://www.britishecologicalsociety.org/about/what-is-ecology/.
74. The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms10.2307/1930070 ↗
75. (2020, February 26). Design Council What Is the Framework for Innovation? Design Council’s Evolved Double Diamond|Design Council. Available online: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond.
76. The modern theory of biological evolution: An expanded synthesis10.1007/s00114-004-0515-y ↗
77. Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species, directional selection, and the evolutionary sciences today10.1007/s00114-009-0603-0 ↗
78. (2019, October 24). Climate Change & Infectious Diseases Group World Maps of Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification. Available online: http://koeppen-geiger.vu-wien.ac.at/.
79. Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data10.1126/science.105.2727.367 ↗
80. Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2 ↗
81. Shattuck, J. (2016). Geography (Study of Science), Rosen Education Service.
82. The Global 200: A Representation Approach to Conserving the Earth’s Most Biologically10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003502.x ↗
83. (2020, March 06). Terpsichores Australasian Biomes. Available online: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Australasian_biomes.svg.
84. (2020, March 06). Terpsichores Deserts and Xeric Shrublands. Available online: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Biome_map_13.svg.
85. Lecointre, G., and Le Guyader, H. (2006). The Tree of Life: A Phylogenetic Classification, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
86. New perspective on the regionalization of the anterior forebrain in Osteichthyes10.1111/dgd.12348 ↗
87. (2020, February 29). Avibase Avibase—The World Bird Database. Available online: https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/search.jsp?lang=EN&isadv=yes.
88. (2020, February 29). SCAR Biodiversity Database. Available online: https://www.scar.org/data-products/bio-database/.
89. (2019, July 01). GBIF GBIF—Home Page. Available online: https://www.gbif.org/.
90. Linsey, J.S., and Viswanathan, V.K. (2014). Overcoming Cognitive Challenges in Bioinspired Design and Analogy. Biologically Inspired Design, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-5248-4_9 ↗
91. Welcome to the Atta world: A framework for understanding the effects of leaf-cutter ants on ecosystem functions10.1111/1365-2435.13319 ↗
92. Diel pattern driven by free convection controls leaf-cutter ant nest ventilation and greenhouse gas emissions in a Neotropical rain forest10.1007/s00442-020-04602-2 ↗
93. Ventilation of the giant nests of Atta leaf-cutting ants: Does underground circulating air enter the fungus chambers?10.1007/s00040-012-0243-9 ↗
94. Nest Thermoregulation in Social Insects10.1016/S0065-2806(06)33003-2 ↗
95. Leafcutter Ant (Atta sexdens) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Nest Distribution Responds to Canopy Removal and Changes in Micro-Climate in the Southern Colombian Amazon10.1653/024.095.0414 ↗
96. Leaf-cutting ant workers (Acromyrmex heyeri) trade off nest thermoregulation for humidity control10.1007/s10164-010-0207-3 ↗
97. Questioning paradigms: Caste-specific ventilation in harvester ants, Messor pergandei and M. julianus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)10.1242/jeb.198.2.521 ↗
98. Ventilation and respiratory metabolism in the thermophilic desert ant, Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)10.1007/BF00309660 ↗
99. The architecture of termite mounds: A result of a trade-off between thermoregulation and gas exchange?10.1093/beheco/10.3.312 ↗
100. Thermoregulation and ventilation of termite mounds10.1007/s00114-002-0401-4 ↗