Effect of Thermal Exposure on Fatigue Properties of 7085 Aluminum Alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
7085 aluminum alloy with T74 was exposed to heat at 80℃-240℃ for 5 h, and the microstructure, the fatigue properties after thermal exposure were analyzed and the relationship between them was built. The results show that the grain size of 7085-T74 aluminum alloy did not change significantly at the studied thermal exposure temperature. Within 120℃, the microstructure including precipitates and mechanical properties have no significant change. Above 120℃, with the increase of thermal exposure temperature, the average radius of[1](#fn-0002) precipitates increased significantly from 3.9 nm to 12.3 nm. The tensile strength and fatigue strength decreased conspicuously from 560MPa and 235MPa to 382MPa and 139MPa respectively. The fatigue life decreased from 10,000,000 cycles to 21,505 cycles under the load of 200 MPa when the thermal exposure temperature increased from room temperature to 240℃. In the range from room temperature to 240℃, the conditional fatigue strengths of the alloy under the fatigue life of 10 6 cycles decreased from 242 MPa to 158 MPa. Furthermore, it is found that the fatigue strength is proportional to the -1/2 power of the precipitate size. In addition, the mechanism on the fatigue properties change after thermal exposure was discussed based on the microstructure variation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. L. Zhou, K. Chen, S. Chen, Y. Ding, S. Fan, J. Alloys Compd. 850, 156717 (2021)10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156717 ↗
2. A. Bendo, K. Matsuda, K. Nishimura, N. Nunomura, T. Tsuchiya, S. Lee, C.D. Marioara, T. Tsuru, M. Yamaguchi, K. Shimizu, H. Toda, Mater. Sci. Technol. 36, 1621–1627 (2020)10.1080/02670836.2020.1821323 ↗
3. M.S. Bhuiyan, Y. Tada, H. Toda, S. Hang, K. Uesugi, A. Takeuchi, N. Sakaguchi, Y. Watanabe, Int. J. Fract. 200, 13–29 (2016)10.1007/s10704-016-0092-z ↗
4. M. Safyari, M. Moshtaghi, S. Kuramoto, J. Alloys Compd. 855, 157300 (2021)10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157300 ↗
5. K. Zhang, J.Q. Chen, P.Z. Ma, X.H. Zhang, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 717, 85–94 (2018)10.1016/j.msea.2018.01.067 ↗
6. S.Y. Song, D. Gao, C. Feng, Z.Y. Liu, Adv. Mater. Res. 554–556, 671–681 (2012)10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.554-556.671 ↗
7. K. Shen, J.L. Chen, Z.M. Yin, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 19, 1405–1409 (2009)10.1016/S1003-6326(09)60041-8 ↗
8. M. Li, Y. Yang, J. Ru, Z. Wu, L. Lu, J. Mo, J Nonferrous Met 32, 353–364 (2022)
9. P. Dai, X. Luo, Y. Yang, Z. Kou, B. Huang, C. Wang, J. Zang, J. Ru, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 729, 411–422 (2018)10.1016/j.msea.2018.05.092 ↗
10. S.L. Yang, C. Xu, Q.L. Lin, B. Ding, Phys. Procedia 50, 19–24 (2013)10.1016/j.phpro.2013.11.005 ↗
11. T. Shiraiwa, F. Briffod, M. Enoki, Materials 16, 1595 (2023)10.3390/ma16041595 ↗
12. Y. Xue, D.L. McDowell, M.F. Horstemeyer, M.H. Dale, J.B. Jordon, Eng. Fract. Mech. 74, 2810–2823 (2007)10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.031 ↗
13. S. C. Jacumasso, L. O. Ribas Lima, J. P. Martins and A. L. Moreira Carvalho, Adv. Mater. Res. 891–892, 1816–1821 (2014)10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.891-892.1816 ↗
14. Q. Liu, C.H. Yang, K. Ding, S.A. Barter, L. Ye, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 30, 1110–1124 (2007)10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01180.x ↗
15. R.R. McCullough, J.B. Jordon, A.T. Brammer, K. Manigandan, T.S. Srivatsan, P.G. Allison, T.W. Rushing, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 23, 65–76 (2014)10.1007/s11665-013-0766-x ↗
16. Y. Zou, L. Cao, X. Wu, Y. Wang, X. Sun, H. Song, M.J. Couper, J. Alloys Compd. 823, 153792 (2020)10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153792 ↗
17. M. Dumont, W. Lefebvre, B. Doisneau-Cottignies, A. Deschamps, Acta Mater. 53, 2881–2892 (2005)10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.004 ↗
18. N. Kamp, N. Gao, M.J. Starink, I. Sinclair, Int. J. Fatigue 29, 869–878 (2007)10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.08.005 ↗
19. D. Thevenet, M. Mliha-Touati, A. Zeghloul, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 266, 175–182 (1999)10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00029-5 ↗
20. C. Booth-Morrison, D.C. Dunand, D.N. Seidman, Acta Mater. 59, 7029–7042 (2011)10.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.057 ↗
21. J.C. Stinville, M.A. Charpagne, A. Cervellon, S. Hemery, F. Wang, P.G. Callahan, V. Valle, T.M. Pollock, Science 377, 1065–1071 (2022)10.1126/science.abn0392 ↗
22. G. Guo, G. Xu, Y. Tang, Z. Zhao, Z. Yi, H. Li, R. Wang, X. Peng, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 168, 227–238 (2024)10.1016/j.jmst.2023.05.031 ↗
23. P. Xia, Z. Liu, S. Bai, L. Lu, L. Gao, Mater. Charact. 118, 438–445 (2016)10.1016/j.matchar.2016.06.023 ↗
24. Z. Shan, S. Liu, L. Ye, Y. Li, C. He, J. Chen, J. Tang, Y. Deng, X. Zhang, Materials 13, 3248 (2020)10.3390/ma13153248 ↗
25. X. Chen, Z. Liu, P. Xia, A. Ning, S. Zeng, Met. Mater. Int. 19, 197–203 (2013)10.1007/s12540-013-2009-y ↗