Show source-provided references
1. A three-year randomized clinical trial evaluating direct posterior composite restorations placed with three self-etch adhesives
2. Badr, C., Spagnuolo, G., Amenta, F., Khairallah, C., Mahdi, S.S., Daher, E., Battineni, G., Baba, N.Z., Zogheib, T., and Qasim, S.S.B. (2021). A Two-Year Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Performance of a Nanohybrid Composite Resin to a Flowable Composite Resin. J. Funct. Biomater., 12.
10.3390/jfb12030051 ↗3. Arbildo-Vega, H.I., Lapinska, B., Panda, S., Lamas-Lara, C., Khan, A.S., and Lukomska-Szymanska, M. (2020). Clinical Effectiveness of Bulk-Fill and Conventional Resin Composite Restorations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Polymers, 12.
10.3390/polym12081786 ↗5. Lins, R., Vinagre, A., Alberto, N., Domingues, M.F., Messias, A., Martins, L.R., Nogueira, R., and Ramos, J.C. (2019). Polymerization Shrinkage Evaluation of Restorative Resin-Based Composites Using Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors. Polymers, 11.
10.3390/polym11050859 ↗6. (2022, September 01). Venus® Bulk Fill Technical Information. Available online: https://www.kulzer.com/EN/downloads/venus_7/venus_bulk_fill_2/Venus_Bulk_Fill_Product_Information_EN.pdf.
8. Askar, H., Al-Abdi, A., Blunck, U., Göstemeyer, G., Paris, S., and Schwendicke, F. (2021). Secondary Caries Adjacent to Bulk or Incrementally Filled Composites Placed after Selective Excavation In Vitro. Materials, 14.
10.3390/ma14040939 ↗10. A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress relief
11. Cuspal Deflection in Premolar Teeth Restored with Bulk-Fill Resin-Based Composite Materials
10.2341/16-072-L ↗12. Santis, R., Lodato, V., Gallicchio, V., Prisco, D., Riccitiello, F., Rengo, S., and Rengo, C. (2020). Cuspal Deflection and Temperature Rise of MOD Cavities Restored through the Bulk-Fill and Incremental Layering Techniques Using Flowable and Packable Bulk-Fill Composites. Materials, 13.
10.3390/ma13245664 ↗14. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: An in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance
10.2341/12-395-L ↗15. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites
10.1007/s00784-013-1177-y ↗17. (2022, September 01). Surefil® SDR™ Flow Product Brochure. Dentsply International. Available online: https://assets.dentsplysirona.com/flagship/en/explore/restorative/sdr-flow_plus_us_version/dsp_911_SDRflow%2BBrochure_Final_082517.pdf.
18. Comparative properties of low shrinkage composite resins
21. The effect of resin matrix composition on the polymerization shrinkage and rheological properties of experimental dental composites
10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.004 ↗23. Comparison of three different methods for measurement of Plaque-pH in humans after consumption of soft bread and potato chips
10.1177/00220345930720050601 ↗24. Zafar, M.S., Amin, F., Fareed, M.A., Ghabbani, H., Riaz, S., Khurshid, Z., and Kumar, N. (2020). Biomimetic Aspects of Restorative Dentistry Biomaterials. Biomimetics, 5.
10.3390/biomimetics5030034 ↗25. Polymerisation of restorative dental composites: Influence on physical, mechanical and chemical properties at various setting depths
10.1080/10667857.2020.1837555 ↗26. Enhanced mechanical properties are possible with urethane dimethacrylate-based experimental restorative dental composite
10.1088/2053-1591/abbf7f ↗27. Borges, A.L.S., Dal Piva, A.M.D.O., Moecke, S.E., de Morais, R.C., and Tribst, J.P.M. (2021). Polymerization Shrinkage, Hygroscopic Expansion, Elastic Modulus and Degree of Conversion of Different Composites for Dental Application. J. Compos. Sci., 5.
10.3390/jcs5120322 ↗28. Scribante, A., Gallo, S., Scarantino, S., Dagna, A., Poggio, C., and Colombo, M. (2020). Exposure of biomimetic composite materials to acidic challenges: Influence on flexural resistance and elastic modulus. Biomimetics, 5.
10.3390/biomimetics5040056 ↗29. The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic acids on nanofilled and bulk fill resin composites: Roughness, surface hardness, and scanning electron microscopy analysis
10.1002/jemt.23403 ↗30. Influence of Cola-Based Soft Drinks on the Microhardness of Nanohybrid and Bulk Fill Composites
31. Colombo, M., Gallo, S., Poggio, C., Ricaldone, V., Arciola, C.R., and Scribante, A. (2020). New Resin-Based Bulk-Fill Composites: In vitro Evaluation of Micro-Hardness and Depth of Cure as Infection Risk Indexes. Materials, 13.
10.3390/ma13061308 ↗32. Effects of Acidic Beverages on Color Stability of Bulk-Fill Composites with Different Viscosities
33. Effect of acidic drinks on shade matching, surface topography, and mechanical properties of conventional and bulk-fill composite resins
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.006 ↗34. Kumar, N., Amin, F., Hashem, D., Khan, S., Zaidi, H., Rahman, S., Farhan, T., Mahmood, S.J., Asghar, M.A., and Zafar, M.S. (2022). Evaluating the pH of Various Commercially Available Beverages in Pakistan: Impact of Highly Acidic Beverages on the Surface Hardness and Weight Loss of Human Teeth. Biomimetics, 7.
10.3390/biomimetics7030102 ↗36. (2000). Dentistry—Polymer-Based Filling, Restorative and Luting Materials (Standard No. ISO 4049:2000).
38. Evaluating antibacterial and surface mechanical properties of chitosan modified dental resin composites
10.3233/THC-181568 ↗43. Long-Term Effect of Acidic Beverages on Dental Injectable Composite Resin: Microhardness, Surface Roughness, Elastic Modulus, and Flexural Strength Patterns
10.1007/s11223-022-00409-z ↗48. Szalewski, L., Wójcik, D., Bogucki, M., Szkutnik, J., and Różyło-Kalinowska, I. (2021). The Influence of Popular Beverages on Mechanical Properties of Composite Resins. Materials, 14.
10.3390/ma14113097 ↗49. Szalewski, L., Wójcik, D., Sofińska-Chmiel, W., Kuśmierz, M., and Różyło-Kalinowska, I. (2023). How the Duration and Mode of Photopolymerization Affect the Mechanical Properties of a Dental Composite Resin. Materials, 16.
10.3390/ma16010113 ↗50. Bi-axial flexural strength of resin based dental composites—Influence and reliability of the testing method configuration
10.1080/10667857.2021.1886664 ↗