journal article·2025-05-09Open access

Comprehensive Adaptive Enterprise Optimization Algorithm and Its Engineering Applications

Shuxin Wang, Yejun Zheng, Li Cao, Mengji Xiong

Biomimetics· Volume 10· Issue 5

Abstract

In this study, a brand-new algorithm called the Comprehensive Adaptive Enterprise Development Optimizer (CAED) is proposed to overcome the drawbacks of the Enterprise Development (ED) algorithm in complex optimization tasks. In particular, it aims to tackle the problems of slow convergence and low precision. To enhance the algorithm’s ability to break free from local optima, a lens imaging reverse learning approach is incorporated. This approach creates reverse solutions by utilizing the concepts of optical imaging. As a result, it expands the search range and boosts the probability of finding superior solutions beyond local optima. Moreover, an environmental sensitivity-driven adaptive inertial weight approach is developed. This approach dynamically modifies the equilibrium between global exploration, which enables the algorithm to search for new promising areas in the solution space, and local development, which is centered on refining the solutions close to the currently best-found areas. To evaluate the efficacy of the CAED, 23 benchmark functions from CEC2005 are chosen for testing. The performance of the CAED is contrasted with that of nine other algorithms, such as the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Gray Wolf Optimization (GWO), and the Antlion Optimizer (AOA). Experimental findings show that for unimodal functions, the standard deviation of the CAED is almost 0, which reflects its high accuracy and stability. In the case of multimodal functions, the optimal value obtained by the CAED is notably better than those of other algorithms, further emphasizing its outstanding performance. The CAED algorithm is also applied to engineering optimization challenges, like the design of cantilever beams and three-bar trusses. For the cantilever beam problem, the optimal solution achieved by the CAED is 13.3925, with a standard deviation of merely 0.0098. For the three-bar truss problem, the optimal solution is 259.805047, and the standard deviation is an extremely small 1.11 × 10−7. These results are much better than those achieved by the traditional ED algorithm and the other comparative algorithms. Overall, through the coordinated implementation of multiple optimization strategies, the CAED algorithm exhibits high precision, strong robustness, and rapid convergence when searching in complex solution spaces. As such, it offers an efficient approach for solving various engineering optimization problems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Intelligent Manufacturing, Shanghai Zhongqiao Vocational and Technical University, Shanghai 201514, China

Engineering Technology Department, Shanghai Caoyang Vocational School, Wenzhou 200065, China

School of Intelligent Manufacturing and Electronic Engineering, Wenzhou University of Technology, Wenzhou 325035, China

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Secretary bird optimization algorithm: A new metaheuristic for solving global optimization problems10.1007/s10462-024-10729-y ↗
2. Human memory optimization algorithm: A memory-inspired optimizer for global optimization problems10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121597 ↗
3. MODE/CMA-ES: Integrated multi-operator differential evolution technique with CMA-ES10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113177 ↗
4. Sakovich, N., Aksenov, D., Pleshakova, E., and Gataullin, S. (2024). MAMGD: Gradient-based optimization method using exponential decay. Technologies, 12.10.3390/technologies12090154 ↗
5. Chaos and elite reverse learning–Enhanced sparrow search algorithm for IIoT sensing communication optimization10.1016/j.aej.2025.04.054 ↗
6. Parameters estimation of complex solar photovoltaic models using bi-parameter coordinated updating L-SHADE with parameter decomposition method10.1016/j.csite.2024.104917 ↗
7. Bodalal, R., and Shuaeib, F. (2023). Marine predators algorithm for sizing optimization of truss structures with continuous variables. Computation, 11.10.3390/computation11050091 ↗
8. Many-objective evolutionary algorithm with multi-strategy selection mechanism and adaptive reproduction operation10.1007/s11227-024-06377-2 ↗
9. Sub-population evolutionary particle swarm optimization with dynamic fitness-distance balance and elite reverse learning for engineering design problems10.1016/j.advengsoft.2025.103866 ↗
10. Machine learning in chaos-based encryption: Theory, implementations, and applications10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3331320 ↗
11. A comprehensive survey of convergence analysis of beetle antennae search algorithm and its applications10.1007/s10462-024-10789-0 ↗
12. Novel WSN Coverage Optimization Strategy Via Monarch Butterfly Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization10.1007/s11277-024-11143-x ↗
13. Metaheuristic algorithm inspired by enterprise development for global optimization and structural engineering problems with frequency constraints10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118679 ↗
14. Cai, X., Wang, W., and Wang, Y. (2025). Multi-strategy enterprise development optimizer for numerical optimization and constrained problems. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-93754-3 ↗
15. Machine learning-driven optimization of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems: A comprehensive review10.1186/s43088-023-00460-y ↗
16. Auto ML for Optimizing Enterprise AI Pipelines: Challenges and Opportunities
17. IHHO: An improved Harris Hawks optimization algorithm for solving engineering problems10.1007/s00521-024-09603-3 ↗
18. MNEARO: A meta swarm intelligence optimization algorithm for engineering applications10.1016/j.cma.2023.116664 ↗
19. Özçelik, Y.B., and Altan, A. (2023). Overcoming nonlinear dynamics in diabetic retinopathy classification: A robust AI-based model with chaotic swarm intelligence optimization and recurrent long short-term memory. Fractal Fract., 7.10.3390/fractalfract7080598 ↗
20. An efficient hybrid swarm intelligence optimization algorithm for solving nonlinear systems and clustering problems10.1007/s00500-022-07780-8 ↗
21. Swarm intelligence algorithms for multiple unmanned aerial vehicles collaboration: A comprehensive review10.1007/s10462-022-10281-7 ↗
22. Physical stint virtual representation of biomedical signals with wireless sensors using swarm intelligence optimization algorithm10.1109/JSEN.2022.3233407 ↗
23. Swarm intelligence: A survey of model classification and applications10.1016/j.cja.2024.03.019 ↗
24. Exploring the application of ant colony optimization in path planning for Unmanned Surface Vehicles10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118738 ↗
25. 25 years of particle swarm optimization: Flourishing voyage of two decades10.1007/s11831-022-09849-x ↗
26. Current studies and applications of shuffled frog leaping algorithm: A review10.1007/s11831-021-09707-2 ↗
27. The innovative optimization techniques for forecasting the energy consumption of buildings using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm and different neural networks10.1016/j.energy.2022.126548 ↗
28. EPKO: Enhanced pied kingfisher optimizer for numerical optimization and engineering problems10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127416 ↗
29. An energy efficient clustering with enhanced chicken swarm optimization algorithm with adaptive position routing protocol in mobile adhoc network10.1007/s11235-023-01041-1 ↗
30. A multi-objective chicken swarm optimization algorithm based on dual external archive with various elites10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109920 ↗
31. Innovative application of particle swarm algorithm in the improvement of digital enterprise management efficiency10.1016/j.sasc.2024.200151 ↗
32. Consistent African vulture optimization algorithm for electrical energy exchange in commercial buildings10.1016/j.energy.2025.134741 ↗
33. Multiobjective enterprise development algorithm for optimizing structural design by weight and displacement10.1016/j.apm.2024.115676 ↗
34. An image encryption scheme proposed by modifying chaotic tent map using fuzzy numbers10.1007/s11042-022-13941-6 ↗
35. Fu, Y., Liu, D., Fu, S., Chen, J., and He, L. (2024). Enhanced Aquila optimizer based on tent chaotic mapping and new rules. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-53064-6 ↗
36. Improved GWO-MCSVM algorithm based on nonlinear convergence factor and tent chaotic mapping and its application in transformer condition assessment10.1016/j.epsr.2023.109754 ↗
37. Parameter estimation of fractional-order chaotic power system based on lens imaging learning strategy state transition algorithm10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3243081 ↗
38. Multifactorial brain storm optimization algorithm based on direct search transfer mechanism and concave lens imaging learning strategy10.1007/s11227-022-04916-3 ↗
39. Yuan, P., Zhang, T., Yao, L., Lu, Y., and Zhuang, W. (2022). A hybrid golden jackal optimization and golden sine algorithm with dynamic lens-imaging learning for global optimization problems. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12199709 ↗
40. The effects of an augmented reality lens imaging learning system on students’ science achievement, learning motivation, and inquiry skills in physics inquiry activities10.1007/s10639-024-12973-9 ↗
41. A new adaptive tuned Social Group Optimization (SGO) algorithm with sigmoid-adaptive inertia weight for solving engineering design problems10.1007/s11042-021-11266-4 ↗
42. An adaptive inertia weight teaching–learning-based optimization for optimal energy balance in microgrid considering islanded conditions10.1007/s12667-022-00526-3 ↗
43. Jain, M., Saihjpal, V., Singh, N., and Singh, S.B. (2022). An overview of variants and advancements of PSO algorithm. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178392 ↗
44. Review of the grey wolf optimization algorithm: Variants and applications10.1007/s00521-023-09202-8 ↗
45. The arithmetic optimization algorithm10.1016/j.cma.2020.113609 ↗
46. Dung beetle optimizer: A new meta-heuristic algorithm for global optimization10.1007/s11227-022-04959-6 ↗
47. Golden jackal optimization: A novel nature-inspired optimizer for engineering applications10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116924 ↗
48. A hybrid multi-strategy SCSO algorithm for robot path planning10.1007/s12530-025-09680-2 ↗
49. Black-winged kite algorithm: A nature-inspired meta-heuristic for solving benchmark functions and engineering problems10.1007/s10462-024-10723-4 ↗
50. Trojovský, P., and Dehghani, M. (2023). Subtraction-average-based optimizer: A new swarm-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Biomimetics, 8.10.3389/fmech.2022.1126450 ↗