journal article·2024-03-06Open access

Application of Machine Learning in the Quantitative Analysis of the Surface Characteristics of Highly Abundant Cytoplasmic Proteins: Toward AI-Based Biomimetics

Jooa Moon, Guanghao Hu, Tomohiro Hayashi

Biomimetics· Volume 9· Issue 3

Abstract

Proteins in the crowded environment of human cells have often been studied regarding nonspecific interactions, misfolding, and aggregation, which may cause cellular malfunction and disease. Specifically, proteins with high abundance are more susceptible to these issues due to the law of mass action. Therefore, the surfaces of highly abundant cytoplasmic (HAC) proteins directly exposed to the environment can exhibit specific physicochemical, structural, and geometrical characteristics that reduce nonspecific interactions and adapt to the environment. However, the quantitative relationships between the overall surface descriptors still need clarification. Here, we used machine learning to identify HAC proteins using hydrophobicity, charge, roughness, secondary structures, and B-factor from the protein surfaces and quantified the contribution of each descriptor. First, several supervised learning algorithms were compared to solve binary classification problems for the surfaces of HAC and extracellular proteins. Then, logistic regression was used for the feature importance analysis of descriptors considering model performance (80.2% accuracy and 87.6% AUC) and interpretability. The HAC proteins showed positive correlations with negatively and positively charged areas but negative correlations with hydrophobicity, the B-factor, the proportion of beta structures, roughness, and the proportion of disordered regions. Finally, the details of each descriptor could be explained concerning adaptative surface strategies of HAC proteins to regulate nonspecific interactions, protein folding, flexibility, stability, and adsorption. This study presented a novel approach using various surface descriptors to identify HAC proteins and provided quantitative design rules for the surfaces well-suited to human cellular crowded environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Protein Structure and Dynamics · Enzyme Structure and Function · Machine Learning in Bioinformatics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Materials and Chemical Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama 226-8502, Japan

The Institute for Solid State Physics, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-0882, Japan

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Macromolecular crowding: Obvious but underappreciated10.1016/S0968-0004(01)01938-7 ↗
2. Protein interaction patterns in different cellular environments are revealed by in-cell NMR10.1038/srep14456 ↗
3. Molecular crowding effects on protein stability10.1196/annals.1363.005 ↗
4. Nonspecific Binding-Fundamental Concepts and Consequences for Biosensing Applications10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00044 ↗
5. Connecting the Dots: Macromolecular Crowding and Protein Aggregation10.1007/s10895-022-03082-2 ↗
6. Protein abundance is key to distinguish promiscuous from functional phosphorylation based on evolutionary information10.1098/rstb.2012.0078 ↗
7. Effects of macromolecular crowding on protein folding and aggregation10.1093/emboj/18.24.6927 ↗
8. Loos, M.S., Ramakrishnan, R., Vranken, W., Tsirigotaki, A., Tsare, E.P., Zorzini, V., Geyter, J., Yuan, B., Tsamardinos, I., and Klappa, M. (2019). Structural Basis of the Subcellular Topology Landscape of. Front. Microbiol., 10.10.3389/fmicb.2019.01670 ↗
9. Decoding nonspecific interactions from nature10.1039/c2sc21135a ↗
10. Cellular crowding imposes global constraints on the chemistry and evolution of proteomes10.1073/pnas.1209312109 ↗
11. Mer, A.S., and Andrade-Navarro, M.A. (2013). A novel approach for protein subcellular location prediction using amino acid exposure. BMC Bioinform., 14.10.1186/1471-2105-14-342 ↗
12. Machine learning solutions for predicting protein–protein interactions10.1002/wcms.1618 ↗
13. Machine-learning methods for ligand–protein molecular docking10.1016/j.drudis.2021.09.007 ↗
14. Protein Subcellular Localization Prediction Model Based on Graph Convolutional Network10.1007/s12539-022-00529-9 ↗
15. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 ↗
16. Fam, S.Y., Chee, C.F., Yong, C.Y., Ho, K.L., Mariatulqabtiah, A.R., and Tan, W.S. (2020). Stealth Coating of Nanoparticles in Drug-Delivery Systems. Nanomaterials, 10.10.3390/nano10040787 ↗
17. PaxDb, a database of protein abundance averages across all three domains of life10.1074/mcp.O111.014704 ↗
18. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium10.1038/75556 ↗
19. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: Massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models10.1093/nar/gkab1061 ↗
20. lDDT: A local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference tests10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 ↗
21. Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 ↗
22. Ruff, K.M., and Pappu, R.V. (2021). AlphaFold and Implications for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 433.10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167208 ↗
23. AlphaFold2 models indicate that protein sequence determines both structure and dynamics10.1038/s41598-022-14382-9 ↗
24. Morris, O.M., Torpey, J.H., and Isaacson, R.L. (2021). Intrinsically disordered proteins: Modes of binding with emphasis on disordered domains. Open Biol., 11.10.1098/rsob.210222 ↗
25. An easy-to-use program for analyzing cavities, volumes and surface areas of chemical structures10.1107/S1600576722004988 ↗
26. Fractal surfaces of proteins10.1126/science.4071040 ↗
27. Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot10.1016/0022-2836(84)90309-7 ↗
28. Interferenz von Röntgenstrahlen und Wärmebewegung10.1002/andp.19133480105 ↗
29. Atomic Dispacement Parameter Nomenclature. Report of a Subcommittee on Atomic Displacement Parameter Nomenclature10.1107/S0108767396005697 ↗
30. Protein thermal stability: Insights from atomic displacement parameters (B values)10.1093/protein/13.1.9 ↗
31. Relationship of protein flexibility to thermostability10.1093/protein/1.6.477 ↗
32. Flexibility analysis of enzyme active sites by crystallographic temperature factors10.1093/proeng/gzg014 ↗
33. Structural and Biochemical Studies of Substrate Selectivity in Ascaris suum Thiolases10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01123 ↗
34. Liu, Q., Li, Z., and Li, J. (2014). Use B-factor related features for accurate classification between protein binding interfaces and crystal packing contacts. BMC Bioinform., 15.10.1186/1471-2105-15-S16-S3 ↗
35. Putting AlphaFold models to work with phenix.process_predicted_model and ISOLDE10.1107/S2059798322010026 ↗
36. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network10.1126/science.abj8754 ↗
37. Improved protein structure refinement guided by deep learning based accuracy estimation10.1038/s41467-021-21511-x ↗
38. Utility of B-Factors in Protein Science: Interpreting Rigidity, Flexibility, and Internal Motion and Engineering Thermostability10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00290 ↗
39. Protein flexibility and rigidity predicted from sequence10.1002/prot.20587 ↗
40. 3V: Cavity, channel and cleft volume calculator and extractor10.1093/nar/gkq395 ↗
41. Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S., and Sturdivant, R.X. (2013). Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118548387 ↗
42. On Protein Folding in Crowded Conditions10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02642 ↗
43. Protein folding by the effects of macromolecular crowding10.1110/ps.03288104 ↗
44. Excluded volume as a determinant of macromolecular structure and reactivity10.1002/bip.1981.360201006 ↗
45. Predicting Protein Surface Property with its Surface Hydrophobicity10.2174/18755305MTE0oNDQ54 ↗
46. Structural patterns in alpha helices and beta sheets in globular proteins10.2174/092986609788923239 ↗
47. Effects of Weak Nonspecific Interactions with ATP on Proteins10.1021/jacs.0c13118 ↗
48. Solubility of proteins
49. Abundance and Temperature Dependency of Protein-Protein Interaction Revealed by Interface Structure Analysis and Stability Evolution10.1038/srep26737 ↗
50. Cell-wide analysis of protein thermal unfolding reveals determinants of thermostability10.1126/science.aai7825 ↗
51. Amino acid and peptide net charges: A simple calculational procedure10.1016/0307-4412(85)90114-1 ↗
52. Miclotte, G., Martens, K., and Fostier, J. (2020). Computational assessment of the feasibility of protonation-based protein sequencing. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0238625 ↗
53. Toward a Molecular Understanding of Protein Solubility: Increased Negative Surface Charge Correlates with Increased Solubility10.1016/j.bpj.2012.01.060 ↗
54. Protein aggregation—Pathways and influencing factors10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.02.025 ↗
55. Enhancement of protein adsorption induced by surface roughness10.1021/la0621923 ↗
56. Scopelliti, P.E., Borgonovo, A., Indrieri, M., Giorgetti, L., Bongiorno, G., Carbone, R., Podestà, A., and Milani, P. (2010). The effect of surface nanometre-scale morphology on protein adsorption. PLoS ONE, 5.10.1371/journal.pone.0011862 ↗
57. Streptavidin-coated surfaces suppress bacterial colonization by inhibiting non-specific protein adsorption10.1002/jbm.a.36276 ↗
58. Protein surface roughness and small molecular binding sites10.1006/jmbi.1998.2411 ↗
59. Protein- and Cell-Resistance of Zwitterionic Peptide-Based Self-Assembled Monolayers: Anti-Biofouling Tests and Surface Force Analysis10.3389/fchem.2021.748017 ↗
60. Critical amino acid residues for the specific binding of the Ti-recognizing recombinant ferritin with oxide surfaces of titanium and silicon10.1021/la901242q ↗
61. Mechanism underlying specificity of proteins targeting inorganic materials10.1021/nl060050n ↗
62. Correlating single-molecule and ensemble-average measurements of peptide adsorption onto different inorganic materials10.1039/C6CP01168C ↗
63. Quantitative Evaluation of Peptide-Material Interactions by a Force Mapping Method: Guidelines for Surface Modification10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01691 ↗
64. Selective nanoscale positioning of ferritin and nanoparticles by means of target-specific peptides10.1002/smll.200600220 ↗
65. Recent Advances in Electrochemical Immunosensors10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04281 ↗
66. Rampado, R., Crotti, S., Caliceti, P., Pucciarelli, S., and Agostini, M. (2020). Recent Advances in Understanding the Protein Corona of Nanoparticles and in the Formulation of “Stealthy” Nanomaterials. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 8.10.3389/fbioe.2020.00166 ↗