journal article·2023-05-16

An in vivo preclinical study assessing biocompatibility of Pd-based bulk metallic glass

Lukasz Witek, Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak, Ricardo Rodriguez Colon, Andrea Torroni, Marios D. Demetriou, Paulo G. Coelho

Publisher page

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The bulk metallic glass (BMG), Pd79Ag3.5P6Si9.5Ge2, has a high fracture toughness and has been found to accommodate post-yield stress, unlike most other BMG. Moreover, due to its greater noble gas composition it has a intrinsic corrosion resistance, ideal for dental and orthopedic implants. OBJECTIVE: This present study aimed to evaluate the in vivo application of Pd79Ag3.5P6Si9.5Ge2 in a large translational sheep model to assess its efficacy to be utilized as an endosteal device. METHODS: Twelve implants in the form of cylindrical rods (3 mm in diameter) were produced through rapid quenching. Each sheep (n = 12) received one osteotomy in the mandibular region using rotary instrumentation, which was filled with Pd79Ag3.5P6Si9.5Ge2. After 6- and 24-weeks the animals were euthanized, and samples collected en bloc to conduct histomorphometric analysis. The degree of osseointegration were assessed through bone-to-implant contact (BIC). RESULTS: All samples revealed favorable BIC along with with fibrous connective tissue layers at both 6- and 24-weeks. Bone along with interfacial remodeling was observed in proximity with the metallic glass surface at 6 weeks with higher degrees of bone organization being observed at the later healing time, 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The synthesized BMG, given its unique combination of toughness and strength, revealed potential to serve as an alternative to commonly used Ti alloys.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

, , New York University College of Dentistry, , , USA

, New York University Tandon School of Engineering, , , USA

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, , , USA

, New York University School of Medicine, , , USA

, California Institute of Technology, , , USA

Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, , , USA

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, , , United States

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Comparison of histological and three-dimensional characteristics of porous titanium granules and deproteinized bovine particulate grafts used for sinus floor augmentation in humans: A pilot study10.1097/ID.0b013e3182938d03 ↗
2. Commercially pure titanium (cp-Ti) versus titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) materials as bone anchored implants - Is one truly better than the other?10.1016/j.msec.2016.01.032 ↗
3. Immunohistochemical evaluation of autogenous mandibular bone grafts integration: An experimental study10.25083/rbl/24.2/229.235 ↗
4. Argon-based atmospheric pressure plasma enhances early bone response to rough titanium surfaces10.1002/jbm.a.34127 ↗
5. Titanium corrosion: Implications for dental implants
6. J.C.M. Souza, K. Apaza-Bedoya, C.A.M. Benfatti, F.S. Silva and B. Henriques, A comprehensive review on the corrosion pathways of titanium dental implants and their biological adverse effects, Metals 10(9) (2020).10.3390/met10091272 ↗
7. Corrosion and corrosion fatigue of Vitreloy glasses containing low fractions of late transition metals10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.12.025 ↗
8. Amorphous metals for hard-tissue prosthesis10.1007/s11837-010-0038-2 ↗
9. A damage-tolerant glass10.1038/nmat2930 ↗
10. The conflicts between strength and toughness10.1038/nmat3115 ↗
11. Sheep as an experimental model for biomaterial implant evaluation10.1590/1413-785220162405161949 ↗
12. The effect of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implants with different surface treatments: A study in sheep10.1002/jbm.b.34154 ↗
13. Biomechanical and histologic basis of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implant placement in low density bone. An experimental study in sheep10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.007 ↗
14. Osseodensification outperforms conventional implant subtractive instrumentation: A study in sheep10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.051 ↗
15. Osseointegration of metallic devices: Current trends based on implant hardware design10.1016/j.abb.2014.06.033 ↗
16. Spector · 2011 · 1
18. Electrochemical and surface analytical characterization of titanium and titanium hydride thin film electrode oxidation10.1149/1.2131295 ↗
19. Young’s modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: ultrasonic and microtensile measurements10.1016/0021-9290(93)90042-D ↗
20. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results10.1302/0301-620X.69B1.3818732 ↗
21. Design and mechanical properties of new 𝛽 type titanium alloys for implant materials10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00808-3 ↗
22. Microstructure and mechanical properties of an 𝛼 + 𝛽 type Ti-4V-0.6O alloy10.2320/matertrans.L-M2017825 ↗
23. Moghaddam · 2014 · V001T03A031
24. Buckwalter · 2000
25. Enhanced fatigue endurance of metallic glasses through a staircase-like fracture mechanism10.1073/pnas.1317715110 ↗
26. On the fracture toughness of advanced materials10.1002/adma.200803322 ↗
27. Bulk metallic glasses for biomedical applications10.1007/s11837-009-0128-1 ↗
28. Bulk metallic glasses for implantable medical devices and surgical tools10.1002/adma.201505347 ↗
29. Mechanical behavior of amorphous alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.052 ↗
30. Quasi-static constitutive behavior of Zr41.25Ti13.75Ni10Cu12.5 Be22.5 bulk amorphous alloys10.1016/0956-716X(94)90598-3 ↗
31. Mean stress effects on flow localization and failure in a bulk metallic glass10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00125-2 ↗
32. Improved fracture toughness by microalloying of Fe in Ti-6Al-4V10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108251 ↗
33. Improvement of fatigue properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloy under four-point bending by low temperature nitriding10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.11.005 ↗