journal article·2015-08-14Open access

Predicting failures of suture anchors used for rotator cuff repair: A CT-based 3-dimensional finite element analysis

Hirotaka Sano, Kei Imagawa, Nobuyuki Yamamoto, Hiroshi Ozawa, A. Toshimitsu Yokobori, Eiji Itoi

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failure of inserted anchors has been recognized as one of the major pathomechanisms of re-tearing after rotator cuff repair. OBJECTIVE: To predict the inserted anchor failure using CT-based 3-dimensional finite element method (CT/3D-FEM). METHODS: Among twenty patients who underwent rotator cuff repair, 5 had anchor failure (failed anchor group) and 15 had no anchor failure (stable anchor group). A 3D model of proximal humerus was developed for each patient based on the CT data. A virtual pullout testing of TWINFIX™ anchors inserted into bone at 6 different sites was performed using FEM. Then, mean failure load of 6 anchors for each patient was compared between two groups. Moreover, an optimal cut-off value of the mean failure load was determined for predicting anchor failure. RESULTS: The mean failure load in the failed anchor group (70.3 N) was significantly lower than that in the stable anchor group (119.0 N; p<0.0001). In our method, the optimum cut-off value of the mean failure load was 75.4 N. CONCLUSIONS: Failure of the inserted TWINFIX™ anchor could be predicted using CT/3D-FEM. In this method, there seemed to be a high risk of anchor failure in shoulders with a mean failure load of <75.4 N.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shoulder Injury and Treatment · Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries · Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Orthopedics, Sendai City Hospital, Sendai, Japan

Division of Orthopedics, Saiseikai Matsuyama Hospital, Ehime, Japan

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan

Department of Nano Mechanics, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Cyclic loading biomechanical analysis of the pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2013 update10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.028 ↗
2. Suture anchor materials, eyelets, and designs: Update 200810.1016/j.arthro.2008.03.006 ↗
3. The incidence of early metallic suture anchor pullout after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair10.1016/j.arthro.2009.08.015 ↗
4. Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery10.1067/mse.2003.21 ↗
5. Complications of metallic suture anchors in shoulder surgery: A report of 8 cases10.1053/jars.2001.18246 ↗
6. Suture anchors and tacks for shoulder surgery, Part II: The prevention and treatment of complications10.1177/0363546505284240 ↗
7. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.08.003 ↗
8. Prediction of the strength and fracture location of the femoral neck by CT-based finite-element method: A preliminary study on patients with hip fracture10.1007/s00776-004-0824-1 ↗
9. Stress distribution inside bone after suture anchor insertion: Simulation using a three-dimensional finite element method10.1007/s00167-012-2060-0 ↗
10. Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone10.1016/0021-9290(94)90056-6 ↗
11. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00123-1 ↗
12. Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00257-4 ↗
13. Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure10.2106/00004623-199308000-00009 ↗
14. Anchor design and bone mineral density affect the pull-out strength of suture anchors in rotator cuff repair: Which anchors are best to use in patients with low bone quality?10.1177/0363546503262644 ↗
15. Does bone density of the greater tuberosity change in patients over 70?10.1016/j.otsr.2013.11.009 ↗
16. A rotator cuff rupture produces permanent osteoporosis in the affected extremity, but not in those with whom shoulder function has returned to normal10.1002/jbmr.5650100817 ↗
17. Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.006 ↗
18. Cyclic loading of rotator cuff repairs: A comparison of bioabsorbable tacks with metal suture anchors and transosseous sutures10.1053/jars.2001.21243 ↗
19. Suture anchor fixation strength in osteopenic versus non-osteopenic bone for rotator cuff repair10.1007/s00402-008-0689-4 ↗
20. Pullout strength of suture anchors in comparison with transosseous sutures for rotator cuff repair10.1007/s00167-007-0460-3 ↗
21. Pullout strength of suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair10.2106/00004623-200311000-00021 ↗
22. The effect of the trabecular microstructure on the pullout strength of suture anchors10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.013 ↗
23. Assessment of bone quality within the tuberosities of the osteoporotic humeral head: Relevance for anchor positioning in rotator cuff repair10.1177/0363546509354989 ↗
24. Measurement of volumetric bone mineral density in proximal humerus using quantitative computed tomography in patients with unilateral rotator cuff tear10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.024 ↗
25. [25]M. Serhan, L. Altinel, M. Eroglu, O. Verim, T. Demir and H. Atmaca, Suture anchor fixation strength with or without augmentation in osteopenic and severely osteoporotic bones in rotator cuff repair: A biomechanical study on polyurethane foam model, J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 9 (2014), 48.10.1186/1749-799X-9-48 ↗
26. Bioabsorbable tricalcium phosphate bone cement strengthens fixation of suture anchors10.1007/s11999-010-1412-7 ↗