journal article·2018-09-17

Biomechanical evaluation of four surgical scenarios of lumbar fusion with hyperlordotic interbody cage: A finite element study

Zhenjun Zhang, Guy R. Fogel, Zhenhua Liao, Yitao Sun, Xuejun Sun, Weiqiang Liu

Publisher page

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal fusion in the interbody space is augmented with interbody fusion cages to provide structural support while arthrodesis occurs. Subsidence is a serious complication of interbody fusion. However, the biomechanical influence of anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) and pedicle screws on subsidence has not been fully understood. OBJECTIVE: To investigate biomechanical effects of the hyperlordotic cages in different surgical conditions using finite element analysis. METHODS: Four surgical finite element (FE) models were constructed by inserting 15 degree lordosis cage at the L3-L4 disc space. The four surgical conditions were ALL intact (M1), ALL resected (M2), ALL intact and bilateral pedicle screws (M3), and ALL resected and bilateral pedicle screws (M4). Follow loads were applied at the L2 vertebral body while the inferior surface of L5 was fixed. FEA was implemented to simulate the four motion modes and biomechanical properties of four fusion scenarios with hyperlordotic interbody cage were compared. RESULTS: The range of motion (ROM) and facet joint force (FJF) at L3-L4 decreased significantly after fusion during all the motion modes. The cage stress and endplate stress at L3-L4 increased significantly after fusion during all the motion modes. The cage stress and endplate stress at L3-L4 for M3 and M4 were smaller than that for M1 and M2 during all the motion modes. The FJF at L3-L4 for M3 and M4 were smaller than that for M1 and M2 during extension, bending, and rotation. CONCLUSIONS: ALL has little effect on the biomechanics after lumbar fusion with hyperlordotic interbody cage. The bilateral pedicle screws significantly decreased the stress in cage, stress in endplate at L3-L4, and lowered facet contact force except for flexion mode. The implication is that the supplemental bilateral pedicle screws are recommended whether or not the ALL is resected.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology · Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy · Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

, Tsinghua University, , China

, , , China

, , , USA

, , China

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis10.3171/2010.1.FOCUS09282 ↗
2. Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: early complication profile10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181679b8a ↗
3. Clinical and radiological outcomes of a new cage for direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion10.14245/kjs.2014.11.3.145 ↗
4. Lordosis restoration after anterior longitudinal ligament release and placement of lateral hyperlordotic interbody cages during the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach: A radiographic study in cadavers10.3171/2012.8.SPINE111121 ↗
5. Anterior longitudinal ligament release using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: a cadaveric feasibility study and report of 4 clinical cases10.3171/2012.8.SPINE12432 ↗
6. Management of sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity with minimally invasive anterolateral lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary radiographic study10.3171/2014.2.SPINE1347 ↗
7. Anterior column realignment (ACR) for focal kyphotic spinal deformity using a lateral transpsoas approach and ALL release10.1097/BSD.0b013e318287bdc1 ↗
8. Sagittal alignment correction and reconstruction of lumbar post-traumatic kyphosis via MIS lateral approach10.1007/s00586-012-2568-5 ↗
9. Finite element analysis of lordosis restoration with anterior longitudinal ligament release and lateral hyperlordotic cage placement10.1007/s00586-015-3872-7 ↗
10. Mechanical response of a lumbar motion segment in axial torque alone and combined with compression10.1097/00007632-198611000-00012 ↗
11. Finite element analysis of the lumbar spine with a new cage using a topology optimization method10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.03.007 ↗
12. Application of a calibration method provides more realistic results for a finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.11.008 ↗
13. Comparison of eight published static finite element models of the intact lumbar spine: Predictive power of models improves when combined together10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.04.002 ↗
14. Parametric convergence sensitivity and validation of a finite element model of the human lumbar spine10.1080/10255842.2010.493517 ↗
15. Biomechanical analysis of various footprints of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion devices10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182a11478 ↗
16. Biomechanical evaluation of three surgical scenarios of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis10.1186/1475-925X-11-31 ↗
17. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study10.1097/01.brs.0000250177.84168.ba ↗
18. Analysis of the effect of lumbar spine fusion on the superior adjacent intervertebral disk in the presence of disk degeneration, using the three-dimensional finite element method10.1097/00024720-200404000-00010 ↗
19. Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on spine kinematics and facet joint loads in flexion and extension: a finite element analysis10.1007/s00586-010-1382-1 ↗
20. Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments—Part II: responses in compression and shear; influence of gross morphology10.1115/1.3426225 ↗
21. Change of disc height, radial disc bulge, and intradiscal pressure from discectomy. An in vitro investigation on human lumbar discs10.1097/00007632-199106000-00008 ↗
22. Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine10.1097/00007632-200112150-00014 ↗
23. Biomechanical effects of the geometry of ball-and-socket artificial disc on lumbar spine: A finite element study10.1097/BRS.0000000000001789 ↗
24. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.003 ↗
25. In vitro, biomechanical comparison of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anteriorly placed, low-profile lumbar plate and posteriorly placed pedicle screws or translaminar screws10.1097/01.brs.0000174275.95104.12 ↗
26. Biomechanical analysis and review of lateral lumbar fusion constructs10.1097/BRS.0b013e318202308b ↗
27. Biomechanical analysis of fusion segment rigidity upon stress at both the fusion and adjacent segments: a comparison between unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation10.3349/ymj.2014.55.5.1386 ↗
28. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study10.1016/j.spinee.2014.06.015 ↗
29. Recent advances in finite element applications in artificial lumbar disc replacement10.4236/jbise.2016.910B001 ↗
30. Biomechanical changes of the lumbar segment after total disc replacement: charite(r), prodisc(r) and maverick(r) using finite element model study10.3340/jkns.2010.47.6.446 ↗
31. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination10.1016/j.spinee.2006.03.011 ↗