Membrane Fouling Mitigation in MBR via the Feast–Famine Strategy to Enhance PHA Production by Activated Sludge
Source abstract
Abstract
Fouling is considered one of the main drawbacks of membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology. Among the main fouling agents, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) are considered one of the most impactful since they cause the decrease of sludge filterability and decline of membrane flux in the long term. The present study investigated a biological strategy to reduce the membrane-fouling tendency in MBR systems. This consisted of seeding the reactor with activated sludge enriched in microorganisms with polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) storage ability and by imposing proper operating conditions to drive the carbon toward intracellular (PHA) rather than extracellular (EPS) accumulation. For that purpose, an MBR lab-scale plant was operated for 175 days, divided into four periods (1–4) according to different food to microorganisms’ ratios (F/M) (0.80 kg COD kg TSS−1 d−1 (Period 1), 0.13 kg COD kg TSS−1 d−1 (Period 2), 0.28 kg COD kg TSS−1 d−1 (Period 3), and 0.38 kg COD kg TSS−1 d−1 (Period 4)). The application of the feast/famine strategy favored the accumulation of intracellular polymers by bacteria. The increase of the PHA accumulation inside the cells corresponded to the decrease of EPS and an F/M of 0.40–0.50 kg COD kg TSS−1 d−1 was found as optimum to maximize the PHA production, while minimizing EPS. The lowest EPS content in the sludge (18% of total suspended solids) that corresponded to the maximum content of PHA (9.3%) was found in Period 4 and determined significant mitigation of the fouling rate, whose value was close to 0.10 × 1011 m−1 h−1. Thus, by imposing proper operating conditions, it was possible to drive the organic matter toward PHA accumulation. Moreover, a lower EPS content corresponded to a decrease in the irreversible fouling mechanism, which would imply a lower frequency of the extraordinary cleaning operations. This study highlighted the possibility of obtaining a double benefit by applying an MBR system in the frame of wastewater valorization: minimizing the fouling tendency of the membrane and recovery precursors of bioplastics from wastewater in line with the circular economy model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering, Università di Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy
Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Università di Enna, 94100 Enna, Italy
CRETUS Institute, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Funding
Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR, Italy)
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Membrane bioreactors for the production of value-added products: Recent developments, challenges and perspectives10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125793 ↗
2. Assessing the performance of an MBR operated at high biomass concentrations10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.10.006 ↗
3. Comparative life cycle environmental and economic assessment of anaerobic membrane bioreactor and disinfection for reclaimed water reuse in agricultural irrigation: A case study in Italy10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126201 ↗
4. The environmental footprint of a membrane bioreactor treatment process through Life Cycle Analysis10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.032 ↗
5. Enhancing polyhydroxyalkanoate productivity with cell-retention membrane bioreactors10.1016/j.bej.2020.107687 ↗
6. Production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) by fed-batch culture of recombinant escherichia coli with a highly concentrated whey solution10.1128/AEM.66.8.3624-3627.2000 ↗
7. Recent developments in Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) production—A review10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123132 ↗
8. High rate selection of PHA accumulating mixed cultures in sequencing batch reactors with uncoupled carbon and nitrogen feeding10.1016/j.nbt.2020.01.006 ↗
9. Integrated production of biopolymers with industrial wastewater treatment: Effects of OLR on process yields, biopolymers characteristics and mixed microbial community enrichment10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102772 ↗
10. Preliminary evaluation of biopolymers production by mixed microbial culture from citrus wastewater in a MBR system using respirometric techniques10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102003 ↗
11. The role of EPS in the foaming and fouling for a MBR operated in intermittent aeration conditions10.1016/j.bej.2016.11.012 ↗
12. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor10.1016/j.watres.2009.02.026 ↗
13. Fouling mechanism elucidation in membrane bioreactors by bespoke physical cleaning10.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.049 ↗
14. The role of extracellular polymeric substances on aerobic granulation with stepwise increase of salinity10.1016/j.seppur.2017.11.074 ↗
15. The role of EPS in fouling and foaming phenomena for a membrane bioreactor10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.026 ↗
16. Comparison of fouling behaviors between activated sludge suspension in MBR and EPS model solutions: A new combined model10.1016/j.memsci.2020.119020 ↗
17. Pilot scale experiment with MBR operated in intermittent aeration condition: Analysis of biological performance10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.075 ↗
18. Effects of molecular weight distribution of soluble microbial products (SMPs) on membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor (MBR): Novel mechanistic insights10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126013 ↗
19. Characteristics of extracellular polymeric substances from sludge and biofilm in a simultaneous nitrification and denitrification system under high salinity stress10.1007/s00449-016-1613-x ↗
20. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: Ecological function and impact on soil aggregation10.3389/fmicb.2018.01636 ↗
21. Critical review of EPS production, synthesis and composition for sludge flocculation10.1016/j.jes.2017.05.020 ↗
22. Producing microbial polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) biopolyesters in a sustainable manner10.1016/j.nbt.2016.05.001 ↗
23. Do biological-based strategies hold promise to biofouling control in MBRs?10.1016/j.watres.2013.06.033 ↗
24. Kourmentza, C., Plácido, J., Venetsaneas, N., Burniol-Figols, A., Varrone, C., Gavala, H.N., and Reis, M.A.M. (2017). Recent advances and challenges towards sustainable polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production. Bioengineering, 4.10.3390/bioengineering4020055 ↗
25. Integrated production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) with municipal wastewater and sludge treatment at pilot scale10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.046 ↗
26. APHA (2017). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association. [23rd ed.].
27. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment10.1016/j.memsci.2006.08.019 ↗
28. Protein measurement with the Folin-Phenol Reagent10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6 ↗
29. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances10.1021/ac60111a017 ↗
30. Bacterial adherence to hydrocarbons: A useful technique for studying cell surface hydrophobicity10.1111/j.1574-6968.1984.tb00743.x ↗
31. Recovery of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) from Cupriavidus necator biomass by solvent extraction with 1,2-propylene carbonate10.1002/elsc.200900034 ↗
32. Olive oil mill effluents as a feedstock for production of biodegradable polymers10.1016/j.watres.2005.03.011 ↗
33. High-Yield Synthesis of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) Copolymers in a Mixed Microbial Culture: Effect of Substrate Switching and F/M Ratio10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03514 ↗
34. Effect of the organic loading rate on the PHA-storing microbiome in sequencing batch reactors operated with uncoupled carbon and nitrogen feeding10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153995 ↗
35. Carbon recovery from wastewater through bioconversion into biodegradable polymers10.1016/j.nbt.2016.05.007 ↗
36. Simultaneous Biosynthesis of Polyhydroxyalkanoates and Extracellular Polymeric Substance (EPS) from Crude Glycerol from Biodiesel Production by Different Bacterial Strains10.1007/s12010-016-2155-z ↗
37. Licciardello, G., Catara, A.F., and Catara, V. (2019). Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates and extracellular products using Pseudomonas corrugata and P. mediterranea: A review. Bioengineering, 6.10.3390/bioengineering6040105 ↗
38. Salinity effect on production of PHA and EPS by: Haloferax mediterranei10.1039/C7RA09652F ↗
39. Treatment of high strength industrial wastewater with membrane bioreactors for water reuse: Effect of pre-treatment with aerobic granular sludge on system performance and fouling tendency10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100859 ↗
40. (2022, June 26). Regulation EU 2020/741 Regulation10.2307/j.ctv17f12nv.7 ↗
41. (EU) 2020/741, Minimum Requirements for Water Reuse. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R1009.
42. Application of membrane bioreactor technology in treating high strength industrial wastewater: A performance review10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.033 ↗
43. Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): Membrane fouling and membrane material10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.044 ↗
44. Banti, D., Mitrakas, M., Fytianos, G., Tsali, A., and Samaras, P. (2020). Combined effect of colloids and SMP on membrane fouling in MBRs. Membranes, 10.10.3390/membranes10060118 ↗
45. Ding, Y., Guo, Z., Liang, Z., Hou, X., Li, Z., Mu, D., Ge, C., Zhang, C., and Jin, C. (2020). Long-term investigation into the membrane fouling behavior in anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment operated at two different temperatures. Membranes, 10.10.3390/membranes10090231 ↗
46. The role of EPS concentration in MBR foaming: Analysis of a submerged pilot plant10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.028 ↗
47. Insights on fouling development and characteristics during different fouling stages between a novel vibrating MBR and an air-sparging MBR for domestic wastewater treatment10.1016/j.watres.2022.118098 ↗
48. Investigation and evaluation of membrane fouling in a microbial fuel cell-membrane bioreactor systems (MFC-MBR)10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152569 ↗
49. Membrane fouling suppression using intermittent electric current with low exposure time in a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor10.1016/j.jece.2020.104018 ↗
50. Comparison between a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.072 ↗