journal article·2025-03

Multi-scale topology optimisation design and mechanical property analysis of porous interbody fusion cage

Huaiyue Zhang, Rongchang Fu, Xu Zhu

Publisher page

Abstract

Background Titanium (Ti) and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) interbody fusion cages cause postoperative stress shielding problems. The porous cage design is one of the solutions advanced to mitigate this problem. Objective Exploring the mitigation of stress shielding with a porous interbody fusion cage after surgery for idiopathic scoliosis. Methods The porous interbody fusion cage was constructed based on the multiscale topology optimisation method, and the postoperative lumbar spine models implanted with it. The porous Ti and PEEK fusion cages were evaluated under physiological conditions to investigate their mechanical properties. Results The volume of the porous fusion cage was reduced by 52.57%, and the stress was increased by 242.76% and 252.46% compared with the Ti and PEEK fusion cage; the modulus of elasticity of the porous fusion cage was reduced by 76.85%, and the strain was increased by 131.40%∼686.51% compared with the Ti cage; the porous fusion cage increased L3 cortical bone stress by 13.36% and 13.52% and cancellous bone by 82.93% and 76.72%, respectively, compared with the original interbody fusion cages. Conclusion The porous interbody fusion cage has a much more lightweight design which facilitates growth of bone tissue. However, a frame structure should be constructed to minimize issues with stress peaks and localised stress concentrations. It also has a significantly lower stiffness which helps alleviate vertebral stress shielding, further fostering bone growth. The porous fusion cage thus meets the clinical requirements for better fusion outcomes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology · Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China

The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830002, China

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/1363849031000163680810.1080/13638490310001636808 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11832-012-0457-410.1007/s11832-012-0457-4 ↗
3. 10.1097/01.brs.0000197664.02098.0910.1097/01.brs.0000197664.02098.09 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11832-012-0462-710.1007/s11832-012-0462-7 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00586-017-5421-z10.1007/s00586-017-5421-z ↗
6. Bin S. Design manufacture and biomechanical research of a 3D printed customized cervical intervertebral fusion cage[D]. Mphil Thesis. Chgo. Changchun: Jilin University 2023.
7. 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.02.00210.1016/j.spinee.2012.02.002 ↗
8. 10.1097/BRS.000000000000077810.1097/BRS.0000000000000778 ↗
9. 10.1097/BRS.000000000000167210.1097/BRS.0000000000001672 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00586-021-06748-w10.1007/s00586-021-06748-w ↗
11. 10.1007/s10856-016-5731-410.1007/s10856-016-5731-4 ↗
12. 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826851a410.1097/BSD.0b013e31826851a4 ↗
13. Dominik AA, Ichiro O, Lisa O, et al. Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage[J]. European Spine Journal 2021; 30: 1–8.
14. Bao R, Wenshan G, Jilong A, et al. Risk factors of cage nonunion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion[J]. Medicine 2020; 99: e19550.
15. 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.11.01810.1016/j.otsr.2017.11.018 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10398210.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103982 ↗
17. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.90099210.3389/fbioe.2022.900992 ↗
18. 10.31616/asj.2020.023110.31616/asj.2020.0231 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.01810.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.018 ↗
20. 10.1007/s42242-020-00102-710.1007/s42242-020-00102-7 ↗
21. 10.1080/1025584090320818910.1080/10255840903208189 ↗
22. 10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61500-810.1016/S1003-6326(11)61500-8 ↗
23. 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90290-H10.1016/0021-9290(92)90290-H ↗
24. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.02.02010.1016/j.medengphy.2014.02.020 ↗
25. Wentao Y, Gaiping Z, Xinguo F, et al. Construction and analysis of a finite element model of human L4∼5 lumbar segment[J]. Journal of Biomedical Engineering 2014; 31: 612–618.
26. 10.2106/00004623-197254030-0000510.2106/00004623-197254030-00005 ↗
27. Shahraki EN, EFatemi A, Goel KV, et al. On the use of biaxial properties in modeling annulus as a Holzapfel-Gasser-Ogden material[J]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2015; 3: 69–78.
28. Spilker RL, Simon BR. Computational methods in bioengineering[M]. England: ASME, 1988, pp.135–144.
29. 10.2106/00004623-197456040-0000310.2106/00004623-197456040-00003 ↗
30. 10.2106/00004623-195739050-0001410.2106/00004623-195739050-00014 ↗
31. Nan L, Yang Z, Qiaohong T, et al. Porous interbody fusion cage design via topology optimization and biomechanical performance analysis[J]. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 2022; 26: 11–10.
32. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.11210.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.112 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10409-023-23047-x10.1007/s10409-023-23047-x ↗
34. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.04.02410.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.04.024 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.inat.2020.10091810.1016/j.inat.2020.100918 ↗
36. 10.1142/S021951942350043410.1142/S0219519423500434 ↗
37. Bülent B, Akif MO, Erkan B, et al. Finite element analysis of lattice designed lumbar interbody cage based on the additive manufacturing[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H. Journal of Engineering in Medicine 2023; 237: 9544119231184379-9544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119231184379.
38. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.03.00510.1016/j.cmpb.2009.03.005 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.04.01010.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.04.010 ↗
40. 10.1007/s42242-021-00162-310.1007/s42242-021-00162-3 ↗
41. 10.1002/jor.2344510.1002/jor.23445 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0234010.1021/acsomega.2c02340 ↗
43. Sen Y, Zhentao Y, Jinlong N, et al. Research progress of surface/interface interaction between Titanium Alloy implants and human tissue[J]. Hot Working Technology 2017; 46: 18–22.
44. Liping W, Shanfang Z, Ruicheng L, et al. Bio-safety of 3D printed titanium and titanium alloys for medical application[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 2018; 22: 5559–5564.