journal article·2026-03

Finite element analysis of six distinct fixation devices for vertically oriented femoral neck fractures

Yen-Nien Chen, Hsin-Chuan Chen, Chang-Han Chuang, Chih-Wei Chang, Yu-Hsuan Chung

Publisher page

Abstract

Background: Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures are a challenge for orthopedic surgeons, and the complication rates are also high. Recently, several innovative devices have been proposed, such as the proximal femoral bionic nail, InterTAN, and medial buttress plate combined with cannulated screws, to increase the stability of fixation. However, the differences among these innovative devices need to be addressed. Objective: This study aimed to compare the stability of the proximal femoral bionic nail, InterTAN, and medial buttress plate combined with cannulated screws for vertically oriented femoral neck fractures. Additionally, traditional fixation devices—including three parallel cannulated screws, a compression hip screw system, and a proximal femoral nail—were included for comparison, resulting in a total of six distinct devices evaluated in this study. Methods: A finite element model of a femoral neck fracture fixed with the six internal fixation devices was created. Furthermore, two different fracture conditions—with and without a 1-mm fracture gap—were considered. The maximum loading during level walking was applied to the model for comparison. Results: The results indicated that the InterTAN has the best ability to maintain the gap and prevent collapse. Under the fracture gap condition, the peak displacement of the femoral head was smaller in the innovative devices compared to the traditional ones. Specifically, the peak displacements were 1.98 mm for the medial buttress plate combined with cannulated screws, 2.12 mm for the proximal femoral bionic nail, and 1.16 mm for the InterTAN system. The von Mises stress in the medial buttress plate was also the highest among the devices, with values of 1000 MPa with the gap and 1477 MPa without the gap. Conclusion: Based on the present results, the medial buttress plate combined with cannulated screws, proximal femoral bionic nail, and InterTAN are recommended for cases without a fracture gap, while the InterTAN is recommended for cases with a fracture gap to prevent bone shortening.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hip and Femur Fractures · Bone fractures and treatments · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physical Therapy, Asia university, Taichung, Taiwan

Department of Orthopedics, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan

Department of Orthopedics, Kaohsiung Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Department of Orthopedics, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

Department of Orthopedics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

Translation Medicine, College of Life Sciences, National Chung-Hsing University, Tai-chung, Taiwan

Funding

Show Chwan Memorial Hospital

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0162318410.1007/BF01623184 ↗
2. 10.2106/00004623-197658050-0002010.2106/00004623-197658050-00020 ↗
3. 10.4103/0019-5413.3857410.4103/0019-5413.38574 ↗
4. 10.2106/00004623-198466060-0000310.2106/00004623-198466060-00003 ↗
5. 10.1016/0020-1383(82)90049-310.1016/0020-1383(82)90049-3 ↗
6. 10.2106/00004623-200408000-0001510.2106/00004623-200408000-00015 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41598-021-01959-z10.1038/s41598-021-01959-z ↗
8. 10.1007/s11517-007-0258-y10.1007/s11517-007-0258-y ↗
9. 10.1080/0309364000872653410.1080/03093640008726534 ↗
10. Karray M, et al. Predictive criterions of unrecognized articular effraction after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Tunis Med 2004; 82: 827–836.
11. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.10.00110.1016/j.medengphy.2015.10.001 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.10643810.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106438 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00068-018-1061-110.1007/s00068-018-1061-1 ↗
14. 10.1097/BOT.000000000000083610.1097/BOT.0000000000000836 ↗
15. 10.1007/s00264-023-05696-y10.1007/s00264-023-05696-y ↗
16. 10.1111/os.1434510.1111/os.14345 ↗
17. 10.1111/os.1285310.1111/os.12853 ↗
18. 10.1111/os.1324710.1111/os.13247 ↗
19. 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.0008810.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00088 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.injury.2022.10.01210.1016/j.injury.2022.10.012 ↗
21. Liu Y, et al. Comparison of effectiveness of three surgical methods in treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2024; 38: 412–421.
22. 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.01710.1016/j.injury.2017.08.017 ↗
23. 10.1186/s12891-022-05014-410.1186/s12891-022-05014-4 ↗
24. 10.1186/s13018-023-04441-w10.1186/s13018-023-04441-w ↗
25. 10.1186/s12891-023-06959-w10.1186/s12891-023-06959-w ↗
26. 10.1054/arth.2002.2767410.1054/arth.2002.27674 ↗
27. 10.1007/978-0-387-92897-5_52410.1007/978-0-387-92897-5_524 ↗
28. 10.1515/bmt-2012-001010.1515/bmt-2012-0010 ↗
29. 10.1007/978-3-030-24440-8_410.1007/978-3-030-24440-8_4 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10921-021-00754-010.1007/s10921-021-00754-0 ↗
31. 10.5405/jmbe.136610.5405/jmbe.1366 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10439-012-0598-010.1007/s10439-012-0598-0 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.05.00210.1016/j.medengphy.2004.05.002 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.00810.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.008 ↗
35. 10.1186/s13018-016-0498-310.1186/s13018-016-0498-3 ↗
36. 10.1111/os.1268310.1111/os.12683 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.injury.2015.06.01610.1016/j.injury.2015.06.016 ↗
38. 10.1007/978-981-15-3159-0_1210.1007/978-981-15-3159-0_12 ↗
39. 10.1007/s00590-024-04050-110.1007/s00590-024-04050-1 ↗
40. 10.1186/s12891-019-2474-710.1186/s12891-019-2474-7 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.injury.2021.11.04810.1016/j.injury.2021.11.048 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00264-022-05414-010.1007/s00264-022-05414-0 ↗
43. 10.1186/s12891-023-07113-210.1186/s12891-023-07113-2 ↗
44. 10.1007/s00590-023-03474-510.1007/s00590-023-03474-5 ↗