journal article·2019-03-25

Experimental analysis of the quality of an implant embedded in the bone based on its mechanical parameters

Marcin Zaczyk

Publisher page

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: We present a description of an experiment in which the parameters describing the quality of the mandrel embedding an implant into a bone were determined. A method was developed that allows, from outside a living organism, the strength of the mandrel of the implant in the bone tissue to be determined. Using the proposed technique, we investigated how the mechanical properties of the bone affect the quality of the implant mandrel embedding in the bone tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of the research work, we conducted 15 compression tests on previously prepared samples that reflected an uncemented endoprosthesis embedding in the proximal base of a femur bone. RESULTS: The results of the research showed that the load applied is dispersed between the mandrel and the bone tissue. The mechanical stability of the embedding affects the mechanical properties of the bone. The experiment revealed the nature of the mechanical stability of the embedding in relation to the increasing contact surface area. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a non-linear nature of dependences of bone density as the main parameter describing the properties of bone relative to the extent of loosening expressed in the form of the slip surface of the mandrel relative to the bone. The mechanical stability of the embedding is crucial in the initial phase of the implant healing because it eliminates the loosening of the mandrel embedding. It provides a guarantee that the specific geometry of the treated motion apparatus part will be preserved and lowers the risk of inflammatory conditions during the treatment process.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

, , , Warsaw University of Technology, , Poland

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. The Pain and Function of the Hip (PFH) scale a patient-based instrument for measuring outcome after total hip replacement10.3928/0147-7447-20001201-13 ↗
2. The incidence and mortality of hip fractures in two regions of southern Sweden 1992–199710.1054/cuor.2000.0047 ↗
3. In vivo RANK signaling blockade using the receptor activator of NK-kappa B Fc effectively prevents and ameliorates wear debris-inducted osteolysis via osteoclast depletion without inhibiting osteogenesis10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.2.192 ↗
4. Management of osteoporosis in patients with hip fractures10.1093/qjmed/93.8.501 ↗
5. Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty10.2106/JBJS.M.00780 ↗
6. Management of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty10.2106/JBJS.J.01197 ↗
7. Finite element analysis of stress extent at peri-implant bone surrounding external hexagon or Morse taper implants10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.011 ↗
8. The effect of stem geometry on stresses within the distal cement mantle in total hip replacement10.3233/THC-2000-8106 ↗
9. Importance of a distal centralizer in experimental malpositioning of cemented stems. A biomechanical study on human femora10.5114/aoms.2015.56361 ↗
10. Comparison of fixation of the femoral component without cement and fixation with use of a bone-vacuum cementing technique for the prevention of fat embolism during total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized clinical trial10.2106/00004623-199906000-00010 ↗
11. Remodeling and ingrowth of bone at two years in a canine cementless total hip-arthroplasty model10.2106/00004623-199274020-00010 ↗
12. Cementless acetabular reconstruction and structural bone-grafting in dysplastic hipssurgical technique
13. A biomechanical comparison of epiphyseal versus metaphyseal fixed bone-conserving hip arthroplasty10.2106/JBJS.J.01709 ↗
14. Total hip arthroplasty with use of second-generation cementing techniques. An eighteen year average follow up study10.2106/00004623-199811000-00010 ↗
15. Effect of bone cement implantation on haemodynamics in elderly patients and preventive measure in cemented hemiarthroplasty10.1155/2015/568019 ↗
16. Zaczyk · 2011 · 69110.1007/978-3-642-23244-2_83 ↗
17. The effect of PDE5 inhibitors on bone and oxidative damage in ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis10.1177/1535370217703352 ↗
18. A comparative study of strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite coating on implant’s osseointegration for osteopenic rats10.1007/s11517-016-1494-9 ↗
19. Prediction of local ultimate strain and toughness of trabecular bone tissue by Raman material composition analysis10.1155/2015/457371 ↗
20. Numerical model to predict the long-term mechanical stabilty of cementless orthopeaedic implants10.1007/BF02345207 ↗
21. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel apatite-wollastonite ceramic cage design for lumbar interbody fusion. A finite element model study10.1155/2018/4152543 ↗
22. Modular endoprostheses for nonneoplastic conditions: Midterm complications and survival10.1155/2016/2606521 ↗
23. Reattachment of the ununited greater trochanter following total hip artroplasty. The use of a trochanteric claw plate10.2106/00004623-200307000-00020 ↗
24. Fractures of the greater trochanter following total hip replacement10.5301/HIP.2013.10813 ↗
25. Total hip arthroplasty in young patients with post-traumatic arthritis of the hip10.5301/hipint.5000499 ↗
26. Bone regeneration from human mesenchymal stem cells on porous hydroxyapatite-PLGA-collagen bioactive polymer scaffolds10.3233/BME-171703 ↗