journal article·2009-06

Surface characterization of the chitosan membrane after oxygen plasma treatment and its aging effect

Yingjun Wang, Shiheng Yin, Li Ren, Lianna Zhao

Biomedical Materials· Volume 4· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Chitosan has received considerable attention for biomedical applications in recent years because of its biocompatibility and biodegradability. In this paper, angle-resolved x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS) was carried out to investigate the chemical groups' spatial orientation on the chitosan membrane surface. Oxygen plasma treatment was also employed to improve the surface hydrophilicity of the chitosan membrane. The results of ARXPS revealed the distribution of surface polar groups, such as-OH and O=CNH(2) toward the membrane bulk, which was the origin of the chitosan membrane surface hydrophobicity. The contact angle measurements and XPS results indicated that oxygen plasma treatment can markedly improve the surface hydrophilicity and surface energy of the chitosan membrane by incorporating oxygen-containing polar groups. With the existence of the aging process, the influence of plasma treatment was not permanent, it faded with storage time. The ARXPS result discovered that the reorientation of polar functional groups generated by plasma treatment toward the membrane bulk was primarily responsible for the aging effect.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.01610.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.016 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00582-910.1016/S0142-9612(03)00582-9 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1381-5148(00)00038-910.1016/S1381-5148(00)00038-9 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00026-710.1016/S0142-9612(03)00026-7 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00126-510.1016/S0142-9612(00)00126-5 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-510.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-5 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00595-710.1016/S0142-9612(03)00595-7 ↗
8. 10.1002/pat.90610.1002/pat.906 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.04010.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.040 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01587-410.1016/S0039-6028(01)01587-4 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00403-310.1016/S0142-9612(01)00403-3 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00037-910.1016/S0142-9612(97)00037-9 ↗
13. 10.1089/10763270030000329710.1089/107632700300003297 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.004 ↗
15. 10.1002/app.1328510.1002/app.13285 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.12.00710.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.12.007 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0014-3057(99)00240-210.1016/S0014-3057(99)00240-2 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0014-3057(01)00130-610.1016/S0014-3057(01)00130-6 ↗
19. Wu S · J. Polym. Sci. Part · 1971 · 34 · 1910.1002/polc.5070340105 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.susc.2006.01.09010.1016/j.susc.2006.01.090 ↗
21. 10.1163/156856193X0060010.1163/156856193X00600 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.09.00210.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.09.002 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.03.00110.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.03.001 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.02.09910.1016/j.apsusc.2005.02.099 ↗
25. 10.1002/pen.1136510.1002/pen.11365 ↗
26. 10.1002/mame.20029002210.1002/mame.200290022 ↗