Cell migration of preosteoblast cells on a clinical gelatin sponge for 3D bone tissue engineering
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Using three-dimensional (3D) bone engineering to fabricate bone segments is a better choice for repairing bone defects than using autologous bone. However, biomaterials for bone engineering are burdened with some clinical safety concerns. In this study, we layered commonly found clinical materials, hemostatic gelatin sponges, in a novel manner to create a 3D scaffold for bone engineering purposes. We further examined the comparable benefits of our design with both closed- and open-bottom holders. Cells in stacked layer disc systems were examined after a week of growth and differentiation. Osteoblasts in the outer layers of both closed- and open-bottom holder systems displayed gradually increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity but decreased osteopontin (OPN) expression. Further, cell proliferation assays and LIVE/DEAD staining revealed decreased viable cell counts in the top layer with increased incubation time. However, while layered disc systems with closed-bottom holders underwent differentiation, they kept more differentiated cells alive within the gelatin sponge disc scaffold after 28 d of culturing. Whether cells were inoculated into the top, middle, or bottom portions of the layered disc stack, osteoblasts showed a preference for migrating to the top layer, in keeping with the oxygen and nutrients gradients. Regarding practical application, this study offers valuable information to promote the use of hemostatic gelatin sponges for bone engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice10.1007/s10856-014-5240-2 ↗
2. Autograft, allograft, and bone graft substitutes: clinical evidence and indications for use in the setting of orthopaedic trauma surgery10.1097/BOT.0000000000001420 ↗
3. 3D printed polymer-mineral composite biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: fabrication and characterization10.1002/jbm.b.34348 ↗
4. Mesoporous bioactive glass/ε-polycaprolactone scaffolds promote bone regeneration in osteoporotic sheep10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.019 ↗
5. Designed hybrid scaffolds consisting of polycaprolactone microstrands and electrospun collagen-nanofibers for bone tissue regeneration10.1002/jbm.b.31809 ↗
6. Cell-adhesive bioinspired and catechol-based multilayer freestanding membranes for bone tissue engineering10.3390/biomimetics2040019 ↗
7. Fiber diameters control osteoblastic cell migration and differentiation in electrospun gelatin10.1002/jbm.a.32756 ↗
8. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
9. Influence of acidic fibroblast growth factor on bone regeneration in experimental cranial defects using spongostan and Bio-Oss as protein carriers10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828f2469 ↗
10. Tissue reaction after implantation of Spongostan, as the carrier of xenogenic bone morphogenetic protein. Experimental study
11. Osteogenic differentiation of preosteoblasts on a hemostatic gelatin sponge10.1038/srep32884 ↗
12. Vascularization in tissue engineering10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.04.009 ↗
13. The influence of dispersant concentration on the pore morphology of hydroxyapatite ceramics for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.017 ↗
14. Cell sheet engineering: a unique nanotechnology for scaffold-free tissue reconstruction with clinical applications in regenerative medicine10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02185.x ↗
15. paper-supported 3D cell culture for tissue-based bioassays10.1073/pnas.0910666106 ↗
16. Multizone paper platform for 3D cell cultures10.1371/journal.pone.0018940 ↗
17. Variation in calvarial bone healing capacity: a clinical study on the effects of BMP-2-hydrogel or bone autograft treatments at different cranial locations10.1097/SCS.0b013e31827ff2b6 ↗
18. Phosphate is a specific signal for induction of osteopontin gene expression10.1073/pnas.140021997 ↗
19. Indications on suitable scaffold as carrier of stem cells in the alveoloplasty of cleft palate10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01594.x ↗
20. In vitro characterization of MG-63 osteoblast-like cells cultured on organic-inorganic lyophilized gelatin sponges for early bone healing10.1002/jbm.a.35733 ↗
21. Development of multilayer constructs for tissue engineering10.1002/term.1504 ↗
22. Engineering Pre-vascularized Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration10.1007/978-3-319-22345-2_5 ↗
23. Engineering principles of clinical cell-based tissue engineering10.2106/00004623-200407000-00029 ↗
24. Engineering vascularized tissue10.1038/nbt0705-821 ↗
25. Development and analysis of multi-layer scaffolds for tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.057 ↗
26. Biofabrication of bone tissue: approaches, challenges and translation for bone regeneration10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.024 ↗
27. Bioreactor systems for human bone tissue engineering10.3390/pr2020494 ↗
28. An axial distribution of seeding, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells and rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells across a 3D Thai silk fibroin/gelatin/hydroxyapatite scaffold in a perfusion bioreactor10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.034 ↗
29. Biofabrication of customized bone grafts by combination of additive manufacturing and bioreactor knowhow10.1088/1758-5082/6/3/035006 ↗
30. Osteoadherin is upregulated by mature osteoblasts and enhances their in vitro differentiation and mineralization10.1007/s00223-008-9138-1 ↗
31. Effects of different oxygen concentrations on the proliferation, survival, migration, and osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells10.1080/03008207.2018.1487413 ↗
32. 3D Printing nanoscale bioactive glass scaffolds enhance osteoblast migration and extramembranous osteogenesis through stimulating immunomodulation10.1002/adhm.201800361 ↗