journal article·2011-06-01

Effects of phosphate-buffered saline concentration and incubation time on the mechanical and structural properties of electrochemically aligned collagen threads

Jorge Alfredo Uquillas, Vipuil Kishore, Ozan Akkus

Biomedical Materials· Volume 6· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

A key step during the synthesis of collagen constructs is the incubation of monomeric collagen in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) to promote fibrillogenesis in the collagen network. Optimal PBS-treatment conditions for monomeric collagen solutions to induce gelation are well established in the literature. Recently, a report in the literature (Cheng et al 2008 Biomaterials 29 3278-88) showed a novel method to fabricate highly oriented electrochemically aligned collagen (ELAC) threads which have orders of magnitude greater packing density than collagen gels. The optimal PBS-treatment conditions for induction of D-banding pattern in such a dense and anisotropic collagen network are unknown. This study aimed to optimize PBS treatment of ELAC threads by investigating the effect of phosphate ion concentration (0.5×, 1×, 5× and 10×) and incubation time (3, 12 and 96 h) on the mechanical strength and ultrastructural organization by monotonic mechanical testing, small angle x-ray scattering and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). ELAC threads incubated in water (no PBS) served as the control. ELAC threads incubated in 1× PBS showed significantly higher extensibility compared to those in 0.5× or 10× PBS along with the presence of D-banded patterns with a periodicity of 63.83 nm. Incubation of ELAC threads in 1× PBS for 96 h resulted in significantly higher ultimate stress compared to 3 or 12 h. However, these threads lacked the D-banding pattern. TEM observations showed no significant differences in the microfibril diameter distribution of ELAC threads treated with or without PBS. This indicates that microfibrils lacked D-banding following electrochemical alignment and the subsequent PBS-treatment-induced D-banding by reorganization within microfibrils. It was concluded that incubation of aligned collagen in 1× PBS for 12 h results in mechanically competent, D-banded ELAC threads which can be used for the regeneration of load bearing tissues such as tendons and ligaments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Collagen: Extraction and Characterization · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.02810.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.028 ↗
2. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.040803.14024010.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.040803.140240 ↗
3. 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31816c5bc310.1203/PDR.0b013e31816c5bc3 ↗
4. 10.1159/00014720710.1159/000147207 ↗
5. 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.00308.x10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.00308.x ↗
6. 10.1016/S0968-4328(02)00033-110.1016/S0968-4328(02)00033-1 ↗
7. Gurkan U A · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2010 · 94 · 107010.1002/jbm.a.32783 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.07210.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.072 ↗
9. 10.1039/c0sm00260g10.1039/c0sm00260g ↗
10. 10.1073/pnas.73.11.402710.1073/pnas.73.11.4027 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.02.00610.1016/j.jsb.2006.02.006 ↗
12. Cooper A · Biochem. J. · 1970 · 118 · 35510.1042/bj1180355 ↗
13. 10.1002/bip.1966.36004090410.1002/bip.1966.360040904 ↗
14. 10.1038/nsb0395-20510.1038/nsb0395-205 ↗
15. Williams B R · J. Biol. Chem. · 1978 · 253 · 657810.1016/S0021-9258(19)46970-6 ↗
16. Liu M Y · Biomed. Mater. Eng. · 2005 · 15 · 413
17. 10.1016/j.micron.2006.07.02610.1016/j.micron.2006.07.026 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jsb.2004.07.00110.1016/j.jsb.2004.07.001 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.12.04710.1016/j.jmb.2007.12.047 ↗
20. Wood G C · Biochem. J. · 1960 · 75 · 58810.1042/bj0750588 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msec.2009.01.00110.1016/j.msec.2009.01.001 ↗
22. 10.1016/S1047-8477(02)00029-110.1016/S1047-8477(02)00029-1 ↗
23. 10.1080/0300820059093550110.1080/03008200590935501 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81329-810.1016/S0006-3495(93)81329-8 ↗
25. 10.1002/art.178018050310.1002/art.1780180503 ↗
26. 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19630327.x10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19630327.x ↗
27. 10.1679/aohc.63.12710.1679/aohc.63.127 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0021-5155(00)00156-810.1016/S0021-5155(00)00156-8 ↗
29. Veis A · Biochim. Biophys. Acta · 1979 · 576 · 8810.1016/0005-2795(79)90487-2 ↗
30. Kadler K E · Biochem. J. · 1996 · 316 · (Pt 1) 1-1110.1042/bj3160001 ↗
31. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.338410.1006/jmbi.1999.3384 ↗
32. 10.1073/pnas.89.20.985510.1073/pnas.89.20.9855 ↗
33. 10.1016/0142-9612(94)90016-710.1016/0142-9612(94)90016-7 ↗
34. 10.1002/jbm.a.2013610.1002/jbm.a.20136 ↗
35. 10.1002/jbm.a.3089310.1002/jbm.a.30893 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78247-X10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78247-X ↗
37. Caves J M · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2010 · 93 · 2410.1002/jbm.b.31555 ↗
38. 10.1021/bi048788b10.1021/bi048788b ↗
39. 10.1021/bi980089+10.1021/bi980089+ ↗
40. Hayashi T · J. Biochem. · 1973 · 74 · 253
41. 10.1006/abbi.1994.136510.1006/abbi.1994.1365 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80015-410.1016/S0022-2836(05)80015-4 ↗
43. 10.1098/rspb.1981.002610.1098/rspb.1981.0026 ↗