journal article·2018-03-01

Histopathological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluations of hydroxyapatite/bioactive glass and fluorapatite/bioactive glass nanocomposite foams as cell scaffolds in rat tibia: an in vivo study

Maryam Seyedmajidi, Sina Haghanifar, Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki, Seyedali Seyedmajidi

Biomedical Materials· Volume 13· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Bone defects are common and persistent problems in clinical orthopedics and dentistry. The development of synthetic reconstruction materials is essential owing to the restricted access to natural bone grafts, disease transmission risks, surgical costs, donor-site morbidity, infections, and immune response-related complications. The present study was done to evaluate the histopathological, histomorphometrical, and radiological characteristics of composite foams containing hydroxyapatite/bioactive glass (HA/BG) and fluorapatite/bioactive glass (FA/BG) as cell scaffolds in rat tibia reconstruction. A total of 60 rats were divided into four equal groups, of which three groups were implanted with HA/BG, FA/BG, and CenoBone ® biomaterials, and the fourth group served as the implant-free controls. Five rats from each group were sacrificed at 15, 30, or 60 days after implantation, and radiological, histopathological, and histomorphometrical assessments were carried out. Based on the findings, no foreign body reaction was present in the rats. Additionally, bone–biomaterial contact occurred directly without the involvement of connective tissues. The number of osteoblasts was reduced in the implant groups, whereas the trabecular thickness and rate of new bone formation were increased in all groups, where the increase in the FA/BG group was the most prominent. The mean percentage difference in bone density between the implant site and the host bone was greater in the FA/BG group at all three time points of the study. Based on the results of the present study and the positive characteristics of these nanocomposite foams, they can be suitable options for implantation in damaged tissues in tissue engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Babol University of Medical Sciences

Funding

Babol University of Medical Sciences

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00102-2 ↗
2. The ABJS Nicolas Andry Award: tissue engineering of bone and ligament: a 15 year perspective10.1097/01.blo.0000194677.02506.45 ↗
3. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
4. Fabrication and characterization of bioactive glass/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite foam by gelcasting method10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.03.002 ↗
5. Ceramics, glasses, and glass-ceramics: basic principles10.1016/B978-0-08-087780-8.00016-4 ↗
6. Hydroxyapatite–polymer biocomposites for bone regeneration: a review of current trends10.1002/jbm.b.33950 ↗
7. Regenerating bone with bioactive glass scaffolds: a review of in vivo studies in bone defect models10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.030 ↗
8. Dental applications of nanostructured bioactive glass and its composites10.1002/wnan.1224 ↗
9. Genetic design of bioactive glass10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.08.002 ↗
10. Biomaterials for bone regenerative engineering10.1002/adhm.201400760 ↗
11. Mechanochemical synthesis of fluorapatite–zinc oxide (FAp–ZnO) composite nanopowders10.5402/2012/754704 ↗
12. Fabrication and characterization of magnesium–fluorapatite nanocomposite for biomedical applications10.1016/j.matchar.2010.09.008 ↗
13. Preparation and bioactivity evaluation of bone-like hydroxyapatite nanopowder10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.004 ↗
14. Chemical analysis of silica doped hydroxyapatite biomaterials consolidated by a spark plasma sintering method10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2006.09.030 ↗
15. Silicate bioceramics induce angiogenesis during bone regeneration10.1016/j.actbio.2011.09.008 ↗
16. Effect of the composition of hydroxyapatite/bioactive glass nanocomposite foams on their bioactivity and mechanical properties10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.06.066 ↗
17. Hydroxyapatite bone substitutes developed via replication of natural marine sponges10.1007/s10856-009-3961-4 ↗
18. Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials10.1016/j.jot.2015.05.002 ↗
19. Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review10.22203/eCM.v013a01 ↗
20. Hollinger · 2011
21. Histopathological, histomorphometrical, and radiographical evaluation of injectable glass-ceramic-chitosan nanocomposite in bone reconstruction of rat10.1155/2015/719574 ↗
22. Utilization of autogenous bone, bioactive glasses, and calcium phosphate cement in surgical mandibular bone defects in Cebus apella monkeys
23. Comparison of bioactive glass to demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of intrabony defects around implants in the canine mandible10.1902/jop.1999.70.5.526 ↗
24. Implant placement enhanced by bioactive glass particles of narrow size range
25. Investigation of early bone formation using resorbable bioactive glass in the rat mandible
26. Effect of bioactive glass particle size on osseous regeneration of cancellous defects10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980915)41:4<527::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
27. Reaction of rat’s connective tissue to injectable glass-ceramic-chitosan nanocomposite
28. Kumar · 2009
29. Histological study of the effect of bioactive glass on tibial bone repair in rats10.11648/j.ijcda.20150102.11 ↗
30. Bone defect regeneration with bioactive glass implantation in rats10.1590/S1678-77572004000200011 ↗
31. Comparison of biomaterial implants in the dental socket: histological analysis in dogs10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00126.x ↗